The two key parts unlock the container on the sunken submarine.
Inside the container is some sort of computer with an artificial intelligence that spreads misinformation/disinformation on the internet.
This is the big bad threat they came up with for the new mission impossible fellas.
Because instead of sold snake a badass operator in his prime we got adrenochrome grandpa doing stunts he is clearly 20 years too old to do while being told I have to care about a bunch of random who's I've never seen or cared about for two and a half hours.
I saw (and loved) every single M:I movie at the theater and would have gone to see this one until I saw that it was a 2 parter. I completely lost interest and I'm in no hurry to watch it. Completely boneheaded move by Paramount. Just because that shit worked for Harry Potter and Twilight doesn't mean that it would work for all franchises.
this. people hate the idea of parts, even normies aren't stupid enough to support this. this is why end game fooled them and forced them to show up for infinity war
I actually personally love when a movie is just called "Part II." It gives me the feeling that it's an epic saga. When they change a "Part II" to something else it actually kills my excitement.
They're already printing the DVDs and Blu-rays and cases that say "Dead Reckoning Part One"
Wouldn't it be kinda weird for that movie to always exist, with that title, and never get a Part Two?
The first film wasn't great.
You know it's a problem when the Gal Gadot generic netflix film that rips off Mission Impossible and James Bond is better than an actual Mission Impossible film.
So if that's why they changed this movie title, then why did Marvel Chnage Infinity War Part II to Endgame, when Infinity War Pt 1 was the best movie they ever made?
The first film wasn't great.
You know it's a problem when the Gal Gadot generic netflix film that rips off Mission Impossible and James Bond is better than an actual Mission Impossible film.
why change the title now?
either way, part1 only suffered from the spontaneous barbenheimer collab that nobody saw coming
part2 will have 0 competition
easy win for cruise
they're dropping "part 2" because "i didn't see part 1" would be a big turn-off. and "part 1" was a big turnoff.
and Black person they knew years in advance what movies would be premiering a certain week. part 1's poor performance is ENTIRELY due to it being called "part 1." If anything spiderverse ending on a cliffhanger is what automatically put people off watching anything called 'part 1'
Why did he stop being a "serious" actor to become a Jackie Chan wannabe only doing crazy stunts in action flicks? He was great in Interview with the Vampire and Magnolia but for the last 15 years it's just action slop after action slop.
Why did he stop being a "serious" actor to become a Jackie Chan wannabe only doing crazy stunts in action flicks? He was great in Interview with the Vampire and Magnolia but for the last 15 years it's just action slop after action slop.
the firm was the closest thing to tom cruise being "a serious actor." Also "a few good men," kinda.
I wonder if this means they'll hire a writer who isn't fricking moronic and rewrite/reshoot large amounts of expository scenes to make them less fricking stupid?
key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key
A pickpocket scene and a car chase. Wow, how original. Fake masks and knockout gas. Internet gone rogue. And a promised sequel killing all the stakes of the 1st entry.
Seems to suggest huge plot changes coming. The only reason they would have been called "dead reckoning" is because that was going to be the only navigational means of finding the sub with no tech.
Can someone tell me how part 1 ends? Is it some cliff hanger shit? I haven’t heard frick all about it, meanwhile I heard tons of people talking about spider verses cliffhanger
I watched the new spider verse and almost shut it off because of how bad it was, I only kept going because I heard all this hype about a cliffhanger, which turned out to be fricking nothing. You are actually moronic and a esl poster
the movie is only worse off because it ends halfway through
no twist or anything just stops as a set up for more in a point were cruise has an advantage but is also in the dark
this really shouldve been a sole film
then again, part 2 will likely be kino like 5 and 6
let me laugh at you including a prequel there for a second. okay
Movies with the number 2 in them usually earn less than fhe original. This is why sequels almost necer get numbers in the titles anymore
the exceptions are lower budget movies that got popular in home viewership. the fact paramount is considering dropping "part 2," combined with the fact most paramount+ subscriptions were given away with walmart+ memberships, means people didn't even want to watch "part 1" for free.
there's enough examples of the opposite that it isn't the "2" in the title that causes the movies to underperform, its the fact they're god-awful shit like jaws 2.
Because woke films are all flopping, crossdressing freaks from Reddit have decided to start campaigning against all normal movies, especially if they star action heroes beloved by normies like Tom Cruise
unironically just re release part 1 next year right before part 2
can even do it at a lower cost
then everyone will go see both and make it a double feature
Yeah I even noticed it in the trailers for the last movie. He finally looks too old to believably be doing action movies anymore. But I can't really see Tom Cruise being the mentor type character. I really wonder what his later career is going to look like.
never understood this whole action stint he has done when he can act circles around most people. Interview with the Vampire and Eyes Wide Shut being just a few examples. Unless he just really, really liked doing action movies I don't understand why he didn't try more dramatic roles after the late 90s. I feel like everything he's done since has just been action-oriented.
I respect that. Not like he has to prove himself, just always wondered if it was as simple as "cool stuns = fun". he could just really enjoy that type of movie.
The Mission Impossible movies are fricking kino and no one will ever convince me otherwise. Just watched Dead Reckoning Part 1 with my mom yesterday and it was a lot of fun.
mission: impossible - dead re-reckoning
>Mission Impossible: Men can be Women.
Bit too late for that
No refunds!
How about Mission Impossible: Secret Wars. Beat Marvel to the punch.
The two key parts unlock the container on the sunken submarine.
Inside the container is some sort of computer with an artificial intelligence that spreads misinformation/disinformation on the internet.
This is the big bad threat they came up with for the new mission impossible fellas.
Now quickly throw in some women that we can CGI makeup onto
>vault is opened
>AI in view
>on the side is the name "4shan" written in green letters
Oh so it's Metal Gear Solid 2? That's actually really cool, why do you make it sound bad?
>vidya gay
>thinks something that's utter shit is actually good
all adds up
Because instead of sold snake a badass operator in his prime we got adrenochrome grandpa doing stunts he is clearly 20 years too old to do while being told I have to care about a bunch of random who's I've never seen or cared about for two and a half hours.
I can't imagine how much money they lost with "Part 1" prominently advertised. People don't go to these for the gripping writing.
I saw (and loved) every single M:I movie at the theater and would have gone to see this one until I saw that it was a 2 parter. I completely lost interest and I'm in no hurry to watch it. Completely boneheaded move by Paramount. Just because that shit worked for Harry Potter and Twilight doesn't mean that it would work for all franchises.
this. people hate the idea of parts, even normies aren't stupid enough to support this. this is why end game fooled them and forced them to show up for infinity war
I actually personally love when a movie is just called "Part II." It gives me the feeling that it's an epic saga. When they change a "Part II" to something else it actually kills my excitement.
I agree, but in this case seeing part 1 made me want to skip it and just pirate it before 2 comes out.
They're already printing the DVDs and Blu-rays and cases that say "Dead Reckoning Part One"
Wouldn't it be kinda weird for that movie to always exist, with that title, and never get a Part Two?
Part 2 is also delayed until 2025
why
Cuz the first part technically did poorly
So if that's why they changed this movie title, then why did Marvel Chnage Infinity War Part II to Endgame, when Infinity War Pt 1 was the best movie they ever made?
Because they dropped "part 1" from "infinity war"
The first film wasn't great.
You know it's a problem when the Gal Gadot generic netflix film that rips off Mission Impossible and James Bond is better than an actual Mission Impossible film.
>he knows about some israeliteflix garbage of literally who
kys imbecile
>malding over literally nothing
Do you ever just look at your life and wonder when you became such a dick? You should
shut up womanly moron
>is better
You watched neither.
why change the title now?
either way, part1 only suffered from the spontaneous barbenheimer collab that nobody saw coming
part2 will have 0 competition
easy win for cruise
they're dropping "part 2" because "i didn't see part 1" would be a big turn-off. and "part 1" was a big turnoff.
and Black person they knew years in advance what movies would be premiering a certain week. part 1's poor performance is ENTIRELY due to it being called "part 1." If anything spiderverse ending on a cliffhanger is what automatically put people off watching anything called 'part 1'
His thetan levels only grow! hah hah hah hah hah!
Why did he stop being a "serious" actor to become a Jackie Chan wannabe only doing crazy stunts in action flicks? He was great in Interview with the Vampire and Magnolia but for the last 15 years it's just action slop after action slop.
If anon wants i can beat him up to teach him a valuable lesson about playing dress up and make believe.
He's an adrenaline junkie who gets paid lots of money to be a movie star.
What more is there to understand?
the last time i remember cruise giving a good performance as a "serious" actor was probably war of the worlds, last time in the MI series was MI3
tom cruise was never a serious actor in anything
I liked him when he played the typical israelite hollywood sexual abuser in Tropic Thunder.
How did he get away with it?
the firm was the closest thing to tom cruise being "a serious actor." Also "a few good men," kinda.
>what is collateral
his best "acting"(like magnolia) is when he's playing an obnoxious, self-obsessed egomaniac, i.e. himself.
>no a A Few Good Men
pls
he was hammy as frick in a few good men.
What?
Cruise doesn't want to end the franchise so the intially agreed upon ending being the next movie is now being re-worked
Guess blowing up that historic bridge wasn't worth it after all
I wonder if this means they'll hire a writer who isn't fricking moronic and rewrite/reshoot large amounts of expository scenes to make them less fricking stupid?
>daily scientology shill thread
key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key key key the key key key what about the key the key? key
I liked the movie. For a two parter it felt like you got your money’s worth in spectacle.
Only a handful of people even do realistic action anymore.
A pickpocket scene and a car chase. Wow, how original. Fake masks and knockout gas. Internet gone rogue. And a promised sequel killing all the stakes of the 1st entry.
I watched it for free and I want my money back!
Seems to suggest huge plot changes coming. The only reason they would have been called "dead reckoning" is because that was going to be the only navigational means of finding the sub with no tech.
tbh "Dead Recoking" title sounds so fricking moronic. We should get AI to write a better title and fire all the israelite writers
It'll be something stupid like Mission Impossible: Revengence
A Hideo Kojima Production
just gonna get out of this moving train car and get on the roof of the train for no reason at all bros
the movie was shit, so many characters and scenes tacked on just to give females a role.
Can someone tell me how part 1 ends? Is it some cliff hanger shit? I haven’t heard frick all about it, meanwhile I heard tons of people talking about spider verses cliffhanger
only Black folk and hispanics like Spiderman now.
That doesn't answer my question
You watch Spiderman, lower your tone.
I watched the new spider verse and almost shut it off because of how bad it was, I only kept going because I heard all this hype about a cliffhanger, which turned out to be fricking nothing. You are actually moronic and a esl poster
I said, lower your tone.
Cruise manages to get both pieces of the key that can unlock the AI's core, but has no clue what to do with them.
the movie is only worse off because it ends halfway through
no twist or anything just stops as a set up for more in a point were cruise has an advantage but is also in the dark
this really shouldve been a sole film
then again, part 2 will likely be kino like 5 and 6
Tom Cruise finds the wizard's key and unlocks the sorcerers chest
Mission Impossible: We must save Israel and Ukraine
What's the appeal of these movies? They're all the same
cool action
It's a guy thing. You wouldn't understand.
All hype and momentum fell off a cliff after the big advertised stunt was Tom riding off a cliff. Like, seriously? THAT'S your movie's big pull?
Movies with the number 2 in them usually earn less than fhe original. This is why sequels almost necer get numbers in the titles anymore
>Terminator 2, Aliens, Revenge of the Sith....
let me laugh at you including a prequel there for a second. okay
the exceptions are lower budget movies that got popular in home viewership. the fact paramount is considering dropping "part 2," combined with the fact most paramount+ subscriptions were given away with walmart+ memberships, means people didn't even want to watch "part 1" for free.
He meant specifically with the number 2 in the title; and James Cameron is an outlier to everything. MCU has had the most luck bucking that trend.
there isn't a single "part 2" in the entire mcu. its the "part 2" that is specifically a huge turnoff, for everyone.
No one in the comment chain you are replying to said "Part II." They are talking about movies with a "2" in the title.
there's enough examples of the opposite that it isn't the "2" in the title that causes the movies to underperform, its the fact they're god-awful shit like jaws 2.
oh yeah, im moronic.. then again he aske d aloaded question. typical israelite lies
why are you guys so negative and toxic? it's honestly unhealthy
Because woke films are all flopping, crossdressing freaks from Reddit have decided to start campaigning against all normal movies, especially if they star action heroes beloved by normies like Tom Cruise
are they in the room with you right now?
I'm replying to one of their posts, yeah
YWNBAW btw
you could've just said yes
I liked this movie a lot it's a shame people seem to hate it. I guess it's hard to top Fallout, that movie was way too good
unironically just re release part 1 next year right before part 2
can even do it at a lower cost
then everyone will go see both and make it a double feature
Part 1 is like 3 hours long. Nobody is going to spend 6 hours watching Mission Impossible at a theater.
i thought it was great
i love christopher macquarie
i dont care what anybody says the sleight of hand on top of the train was classic
good morning sir
he had a good run
Yeah I even noticed it in the trailers for the last movie. He finally looks too old to believably be doing action movies anymore. But I can't really see Tom Cruise being the mentor type character. I really wonder what his later career is going to look like.
never understood this whole action stint he has done when he can act circles around most people. Interview with the Vampire and Eyes Wide Shut being just a few examples. Unless he just really, really liked doing action movies I don't understand why he didn't try more dramatic roles after the late 90s. I feel like everything he's done since has just been action-oriented.
He just loves doing cool stunts.
I respect that. Not like he has to prove himself, just always wondered if it was as simple as "cool stuns = fun". he could just really enjoy that type of movie.
Was it autism?
The Mission Impossible movies are fricking kino and no one will ever convince me otherwise. Just watched Dead Reckoning Part 1 with my mom yesterday and it was a lot of fun.
There is nothing more pretentious than naming your movie Part 1, 2, or 3. Even calling it a book is less homosexual.
I only watched it to ogle Atwell and her plump body
they told me you can't bruise the cruise