He earned the right to make all that high octane slop, and its good slop too, better than all the geezers making way shittier action movies. He's pushing 60 and he's trying to find a way to go to outer space to do a movie there for real.
>I need to drive the race car >OK Tom >I need to drive the fighter jet >OK Tom >I need to freedive for a long time for the underwater scene >sure Tom >I need to climb the Burj Khalifa in real life >sounds cool Tom >I need to fly a motorcycle off a cliff and parachute to the ground >Yeah sure Tom....you good buddy? >Yeah yeah anyway I need to be strapped to a C17 for takeoff >Uh, Tom are you- >after that I'm going to go to outer space
He might be a legit psychopath but he's awesome, also I genuinely believe he wants to die doing something insane to solidfy his legacy.
None of the Mission Impossibles are generic, anyone who's watched them can recall the different crazy shit he did. Everything he makes is just a step above, which is why he's the only one to deserve to be called an actual action star in the first place. He's the only true movie star left.
No, even as a leading man of that era Clooney is much more consistent. Pitt has loads of better movies even if he isn't lead in them. Cruise could have been an all time great but the transition from drama to the same generic action shit ruined him.
Yep.
5 feature films. 3 of them won Best Picture. The other 2 were nominees. I find it hard that anyone will have that level of consistency ever again.
I do wonder how his career would've gone if he didn't die so soon.
>dude asteroid comes to earth explosions wow and naked politicians get eaten by alien dinosaurs lmao >WAOW this is important for the adults im glad i didnt watch some comic book film °O°
Ok maybe that is a stupid movie but what about the rest? You can't deny he has a lot of important movies. Tell me someone of his age that has a better filmography.
judged by what? sales, audience draw, awards?
kino
yes
Yes
All 3
he's the only actual movie star left on the planet, the rest are just actors
TPBP
No. He doesn't have many kino.
Arnold has more kino, but then again Arnold hasn't been in anything good since 94
1st movie is Legend
Legend is kino
Pretty sure he was in TAPS before Legend as a supporting actor. Maybe I'm wrong but I just like to talk about TAPS.
He's in more slops than kinos
>The Mummy
>Jack Reacher 2
Name the other slops
Mission Impossible 3 is slop but yeah those are his only 3 bad movies
Action films are an artform and Cruise is very good at making them
Harrison Ford?
Gene hackman?
Rock of Ages
>Harrison Ford?
He had a great filmography until 2008 when he started doing awful belated sequels to all his iconic roles that everybody hated
He earned the right to make all that high octane slop, and its good slop too, better than all the geezers making way shittier action movies. He's pushing 60 and he's trying to find a way to go to outer space to do a movie there for real.
>I need to drive the race car
>OK Tom
>I need to drive the fighter jet
>OK Tom
>I need to freedive for a long time for the underwater scene
>sure Tom
>I need to climb the Burj Khalifa in real life
>sounds cool Tom
>I need to fly a motorcycle off a cliff and parachute to the ground
>Yeah sure Tom....you good buddy?
>Yeah yeah anyway I need to be strapped to a C17 for takeoff
>Uh, Tom are you-
>after that I'm going to go to outer space
He might be a legit psychopath but he's awesome, also I genuinely believe he wants to die doing something insane to solidfy his legacy.
He had a good streak in the 90s of kino but since then it's been generic action movies mostly (mission impossible #5003224)
None of the Mission Impossibles are generic, anyone who's watched them can recall the different crazy shit he did. Everything he makes is just a step above, which is why he's the only one to deserve to be called an actual action star in the first place. He's the only true movie star left.
No, even as a leading man of that era Clooney is much more consistent. Pitt has loads of better movies even if he isn't lead in them. Cruise could have been an all time great but the transition from drama to the same generic action shit ruined him.
Clooney has like, 2, maybe 3 good movies
Clooney has consistently made 6/10 or better movies for the past 25 years. Cruise has made 3/10 to 6/10 movies for the past 10 years
Tomorrowland and The Monuments Men are legit 2/10 garbage slop
Yeah probably, I haven't seen them. Hail Caesar was also a turd, but it's still a solid list of films
You people actually watch George Clooney movies past Ocean's 11?
I can agree on Clooney. But any movie where Brad is a leading man, would've been better with someone else.
wienertail is his best
It should go to Nicholson but if Tom did something other than shitty Mission Impossible sequels it could have been him
I cannot forgive him for the Mummy. It was true slop, Universal's desperate attempt to make their cinematic universe. Tom should've known better.
Crowe is consistently good, bar a few
(Cloud Atlas)
Crowe has never made a great film and I won't hear any nonsense about Gladiator
>Crowe has never made a great fil-ACK!
Its so laughably bad it became popular on Cinemaphile. That's not a good thing.
it's great
>crowe has never made a great film
hmmm excuse me?
>(Cloud Atlas)
>(Cloud Atlas)
that movie is good and he's not in it
When I think movie star, I think "Tom Cruise". Need I say more?
Jack Nicholson filmography is unbeatable.
a lot of it is worthless boomerslop
I really do hope he dies shooting one of his flicks. Not because I hate him (even though he's a weirdo cultist) but because it'd be unironic kino
Only if they've finished shooting his other scenes and he dies shooting the stunt. I don't want cgi deepfakes ruining his final movie
To me Christian Slater is #1 in best filmography
Paul Newman
real answer is John Cazale
https://www.imdb.com/name/nm0001030/?ref_=tt_ov_st
Yep.
5 feature films. 3 of them won Best Picture. The other 2 were nominees. I find it hard that anyone will have that level of consistency ever again.
I do wonder how his career would've gone if he didn't die so soon.
Tom Hanks
Christian Bale
Arnold got him cucked and bucked
Of the new actors DiCaprio has the best filmography.
>All his movies are important movies with some content and not comicshit or other shit.
>>All his movies are important movies with some content and not comicshit or other shit.
I don't know much about that movie but it's still about something and not just comicshit.
You can't deny all the important movies he has. He is the new DeNiro in terms of important movies.
>dude asteroid comes to earth explosions wow and naked politicians get eaten by alien dinosaurs lmao
>WAOW this is important for the adults im glad i didnt watch some comic book film °O°
Ok maybe that is a stupid movie but what about the rest? You can't deny he has a lot of important movies. Tell me someone of his age that has a better filmography.
I will never be angry with getting jak', it's hilarious and sometimes it's an honor to be jak' thoughever.
>proving him right
l
no
Dont think its even a question
Vanilla Sky is kino and I'm tired of pretending its not.
Id be surprised to find anyone here that dislikes vanilla sky that movie is one of my favorites
That's Arnold Schwarzenegger or James Stewart