it's okay but that's saying a lot when it comes to vidya adaptations hence why it's praised. It also didn't tryhard on the muh science. I mean nukes somehow created unkillable zombies and it didn't give a frick.
The Shady Sands shit as already cleared by the director so New Vegas is still canon. Everything else is just autists not comprehending nuance and that things can change in a short period of time.
>NV is still canon even though it no longer fits properly! Just accept it and ignore the other lore breaks that I will not mention because I can’t see Ben attempt to explain those!
Frick off tourist.
nah there was already a thread with them having meltdowns over it, can't take him seriosuly anymore, this is prrof that he is a paid shill, always been controlled opposition and other pol schizo shit. imagine getting butthurt because some youtuber doesn't hate something, it's insane.
I mean you do realize all that is is people shitposting for (You)s right? Of the actual human posters making those posts which is maybe 5-10% of them being from actual humans it'd morons making obviously hyperbolic inflammatory posts to bait for as much attention as possible.
nah there was already a thread with them having meltdowns over it, can't take him seriosuly anymore, this is prrof that he is a paid shill, always been controlled opposition and other pol schizo shit. imagine getting butthurt because some youtuber doesn't hate something, it's insane.
Ah yes /tc/ the hub of pro drinker content because you guys totally don’t cry about him every day. That being said unlike you fools not everyone who watches him blindly agrees with every take he has and know he’s not always 100% core t on anything. It’s called healthy skepticism and we are capable of disagreeing on shit without purity spiraling like you lefty troons. I know that concept is improbably to you but it’s true.
why are his videos so poorly edited? i get that he's a writer first, but it's the same clips, the aspect ratio is wrong, it's the simplest stuff.
the trailer for his own film (short? series?) looks dreadful, and it has similar issues - audio cutting out etc. maybe the novels are fantastic, i don't know. is it a Roger Ebert/Red Letter Media situation?
He's not much of a writer either and I've only ever seen him analyze movies on the most basic, surface level stuff you'd see on an IMDB review.
Drinker liking this is like crawling in the desert hallucinating water. He hasn't seen something good in so long he thinks it's 10/10 because the female protagonist isn't a mary sue. That's just such a huge win for him. Poor guy.
Isn't this guy a chud who complains about woke stuff in media? Why care about his dumbass opinion.
This gay is being shilled so hard it's ridiculous. People talk about how good and spot on he is but don't they know we can just watch his absolute dogshit videos and opinions and see for ourselves?
Is he though? (Examples above) are the typical talk on Cinemaphile about him.
Drinker liking this is like crawling in the desert hallucinating water. He hasn't seen something good in so long he thinks it's 10/10 because the female protagonist isn't a mary sue. That's just such a huge win for him. Poor guy.
This gay is being shilled so hard it's ridiculous. People talk about how good and spot on he is but don't they know we can just watch his absolute dogshit videos and opinions and see for ourselves?
Literally who is shilling him? Every thread you gays post about him or EFAP is just to trash on them. The only thing being shilled here in Thai thread is fallout because god knows you need 10 more threads to talk about it.
I'm talking aboutother media. He's literally on TV now too thanks to that moron Piers Morgan and whenever I see clips from EFAP or any other reviewer on youtube, they constantly praise him and I'm pretty sure Mauler even openly refers to him as a conservative, which is pretty laughable
First off, Mayler is a Brit and so is drinker. Their concept of right wing is vastly different than America. Second all I hear is you spouting the same npc crap that every other Cinemaphile redditor says about them so..opinion discarded. I don’t engage with npc’s. If I wanted to do that I’ll go talk to a ChatGPT bot. They are far better are debate than you guys.
Drinker talks about shows like The Witcher and Fallout from a casual perspective. He doesn't have a deep understanding of the source-material and all his thoughts are very surface-level. Even Angry Joe had a more nuanced and thoughtful discussion on the show, especially about the tonal whiplash and lore implications. I was actually surprised.
Seething Pablo is extremely cringe but I respect that he usually doesn't defend garbage no matter where it comes from. Probably why he's managed to remain popular for this long.
>im feigning hating this show while still giving it an above average rating >based
Pissed Pablo proving he is still playing the manufactured resistance angle. Maybe he should go interview the director and get btfo on another conversation
Has the Critical Drinker even played the Fallout games?
Because if you haven't, or have only played 3 and 4, the show is fine. If you remember 1, 2 and NV, you'll notice so many plot holes, lore incosistencies and just dumb retcons it makes my brain hurt.
>If you remember 1, 2 and NV, you'll notice so many plot holes, lore incosistencies and just dumb retcons it makes my brain hurt.
Even if you have you can just ignore them for the same reason you can ignore these issues when watching the Jackson Lord of the Rings trilogy or the Raimi Spider-Man trilogy.
You kinda can't, because Todd Howard deemed this show canon. So it would be like ignoring The Last Jedi in the SW canon. Now every Fallout game moving forward has to dance around this lore minefield.
The only major plot hole I came away with was the fact it's never explained why the cold fusion scientist woman was somehow still alive and appears unchanged 200 years after the great war.
Other than that I thought the biggest weakness was being too close to the games- If you knew the lore of the games you saw half the plot points coming up from the first episode. People who don't know the games and lore will think more highly of the show because they won't realise most of the strongest plot elements are just copied over from the games.
The fact alone that there are million unopened vaults in California makes the plot of Fallout 1 dumb. Also, somehow, all the people in California reverted back 200 years, just because Shady Sands was nuked via asspull. And Enclave is still around, even though NCR wiped them out 50 years ago. And the mcguffin plot is stupid once you realize what the GECK does and NCR has at least 3 GECK-powered cities in their territory.
The fact that such powerhouse as NCR disappeared overnight, I'm just going to ignore. But where are the other factions?
I liked that about the show. You could tell the scene with the overseer was a dialogue choice scene and he got mad when she asked the wrong question. The structure of the plot follows the quest structure of the games.
1 is my second favorite game of all time and I think the show's pretty good. The series has arguably been inconsistent at least in terms of tone since the very second game, there hasn't been any point in getting hung up on this kind of thing since before most of the series' fans were born at this stage. I don't think it's amazing or anything, but a disproportionate amount of the criticism it's gotten online is just New Vegas fans getting up in arms about its perceived slights against two games most of them haven't even played (and would probably hate if they did).
I dont hate him and listen to his stuff while doing chores sometimes, but man you cannot take this guy too seriously and his schtick gets old quickly
The funniest part to me was when he lists some older obscure movies as his favorite movies, because as "le serious mobie critic" he had to say that. Just say its die hard and terminator 2, nobody cares you pretentious butthole
Jesus this board is probably the most schizo after /misc/, what the frick. Even the vidya boards aren't this bad. What is going on here.
The most badass character in the show is a white straight male. Morally the message of the story was anti-corporatist, but distinctly and specifically not leftist (because the message was pro-liberal, and liberals are not leftists).
I really don't understand why you morons are having such a rage piss fit over this show as though you are going to get anything other than milquetoast tokenism from mainstream media. The show was entertaining.
This particular YouTubuer has always been a "muh feels" midwit. The stuff he gets angry about has always been based on gut reaction with no intelligent reasoning behind it. A stuck clock is right twice a day and all that.
Half you homosexual troon complaints are about muh racemixing muh israeli cuckolding /misc/ bullshit. Having a straight white guy as the clear "fan favourite" lead is the counterpoint to all that.
I don't like anything and I liked this show, so I know for 110% certain that you homosexuals are just being contrarian buttholes and the full depth of your reasoning not to like it is that it has a black guy in it.
>story written by rad lefty antiloberal culturalists to be extra sensitive to those sensibilities because anything less is not tolerated by the Hollywood socialists >show is pushed by anti-liberal corporate lefty media and corporate AAA studio known for abusing its own staff >leftygay on the Reddit tab of Cinemaphile: it’s clearly for liberals!
The name is just a lazy pun on "critical thinker" and his videos have always been a cringeworthy attempt at being a jaded cynic, without any of the charisma required to pull that off.
The thing I like most about the show is it makes fun of the Managerial State. It pokes fun at the fat short mulatto tard and the nerd for thinking they could become leader through an election. I noticed that they make fun of a lot of progressive stuff by shielding themselves behind an excess of Black folk and the troony in the first episode. They filled their quota up front and the show was free to do whatever
Look, I'm sure Amazon paid alot of rupees to get all these threads made, but I'm just not watching your pozzed slop, I'm sorry bro I really am bit I'm just not watching it
>Gary Stu's are good
What an unbelievable bad take from him. Him defending fricking Kirito of all characters was when I realized I had to stop watching
bros have we lost?? i have noticed that even the based have said they loved all the recent slop it started with Dune which i honestly expected people to go against the woke message and now the same people praise fricking fallout? What the hell is going on?
>wrong side of history
>I'm not a communist, Mr. Howard, that's just a dirty word they use to describe people who aren't insane
lol
Is this really in the show?
Yep. It's almost obligatory at this point. They did the same thing the last of us show. "It's a commune! We're communists!"
the most egregious was in the ant man movie where michael douglas starts going on about how we could learn from communist ants
Ants get shit done though.
go back to china you commie scum
Didnt like it because Im not a gaymer who cares about the lore. Too silly and too long for the story it was trying to say
This. Watched 3 episodes and it feels like standard overlong streaming genre fare.
it's okay but that's saying a lot when it comes to vidya adaptations hence why it's praised. It also didn't tryhard on the muh science. I mean nukes somehow created unkillable zombies and it didn't give a frick.
Its not okay, its a bad show
>someone who doesn’t know the lore likes it so that’s proof it’s good!
Lol
>He doesn’t know the lore, that’s why he loved ugly mutts, shit jokes, racemixing and commie propaganda
lol
He’s been desensitized by rings of power and fell for a weaker version of the same crap. That’s why hatewatching should not be tolerated.
The Shady Sands shit as already cleared by the director so New Vegas is still canon. Everything else is just autists not comprehending nuance and that things can change in a short period of time.
>NV is still canon even though it no longer fits properly! Just accept it and ignore the other lore breaks that I will not mention because I can’t see Ben attempt to explain those!
Frick off tourist.
He just has a fetish for the uncanny valley b***h.
all the chuds will flock now since their master said its good
nah there was already a thread with them having meltdowns over it, can't take him seriosuly anymore, this is prrof that he is a paid shill, always been controlled opposition and other pol schizo shit. imagine getting butthurt because some youtuber doesn't hate something, it's insane.
I mean you do realize all that is is people shitposting for (You)s right? Of the actual human posters making those posts which is maybe 5-10% of them being from actual humans it'd morons making obviously hyperbolic inflammatory posts to bait for as much attention as possible.
But you knew all that, right?
Ah yes /tc/ the hub of pro drinker content because you guys totally don’t cry about him every day. That being said unlike you fools not everyone who watches him blindly agrees with every take he has and know he’s not always 100% core t on anything. It’s called healthy skepticism and we are capable of disagreeing on shit without purity spiraling like you lefty troons. I know that concept is improbably to you but it’s true.
>redditor can't believe the rest of the world isn't a hivemind like they are
Sad, many such cases.
>it's a blast
dd2bros we won
With thy love, go into thine isolation, my chud, and with thy chudding; and late only will justice limp after thee.
>The drinker
Who? Someone you say is my "hero?"
>first he goes on daily wire
>now he's shilling for mainstream schlock
Damn is he getting desperate for a job? I bet he'll say acolyte is god tier.
Forgot he went on the daily israelite. Now it all makes sense.
all youtubers get sick of making videos, they want an easier life. This guy has made the same video for the last 4 years and somehow gets away with it
Reddit show
I'm glad Cinemaphile will finally stop pretending he isn't a grifter.
>I’m glad these lefty’s have been making the same takes ever since he got on their radar
Nice attempt to gaslight though
>just turn your brain off bro and have a blast
>did a full 180
why are his videos so poorly edited? i get that he's a writer first, but it's the same clips, the aspect ratio is wrong, it's the simplest stuff.
the trailer for his own film (short? series?) looks dreadful, and it has similar issues - audio cutting out etc. maybe the novels are fantastic, i don't know. is it a Roger Ebert/Red Letter Media situation?
He's not much of a writer either and I've only ever seen him analyze movies on the most basic, surface level stuff you'd see on an IMDB review.
Is he though? (Examples above) are the typical talk on Cinemaphile about him.
why should he bother, nerd will slop it all up hahahaha
Drinker liking this is like crawling in the desert hallucinating water. He hasn't seen something good in so long he thinks it's 10/10 because the female protagonist isn't a mary sue. That's just such a huge win for him. Poor guy.
it's bad ok?
This gay is being shilled so hard it's ridiculous. People talk about how good and spot on he is but don't they know we can just watch his absolute dogshit videos and opinions and see for ourselves?
Literally who is shilling him? Every thread you gays post about him or EFAP is just to trash on them. The only thing being shilled here in Thai thread is fallout because god knows you need 10 more threads to talk about it.
I'm talking aboutother media. He's literally on TV now too thanks to that moron Piers Morgan and whenever I see clips from EFAP or any other reviewer on youtube, they constantly praise him and I'm pretty sure Mauler even openly refers to him as a conservative, which is pretty laughable
First off, Mayler is a Brit and so is drinker. Their concept of right wing is vastly different than America. Second all I hear is you spouting the same npc crap that every other Cinemaphile redditor says about them so..opinion discarded. I don’t engage with npc’s. If I wanted to do that I’ll go talk to a ChatGPT bot. They are far better are debate than you guys.
homie was literally on Piers Morgan with his stupid sunglasses
>Guy as on tv with someone who hates his guts!
Ah yes shilling is when your enemies invite you on their show to debate you and make money off you…
>debate
He's on a panel with 4 other people who agree with him, including that literal moron Nerdrotic
Npc bots, don’t bother engaging with them
Blind moron
Media illiterate homosexual thinks being popular is shilling
blind moron
Isn't this guy a chud who complains about woke stuff in media? Why care about his dumbass opinion.
Jokes on you, I'm from the future and you're not on the right side of history
His digitation to cuckgay is done. I always knew it would happen.
Drinker talks about shows like The Witcher and Fallout from a casual perspective. He doesn't have a deep understanding of the source-material and all his thoughts are very surface-level. Even Angry Joe had a more nuanced and thoughtful discussion on the show, especially about the tonal whiplash and lore implications. I was actually surprised.
Huh, Angry Joe of all people realizes how much the show's retcons frick up the lore.
Seething Pablo is extremely cringe but I respect that he usually doesn't defend garbage no matter where it comes from. Probably why he's managed to remain popular for this long.
based
>im feigning hating this show while still giving it an above average rating
>based
Pissed Pablo proving he is still playing the manufactured resistance angle. Maybe he should go interview the director and get btfo on another conversation
Has the Critical Drinker even played the Fallout games?
Because if you haven't, or have only played 3 and 4, the show is fine. If you remember 1, 2 and NV, you'll notice so many plot holes, lore incosistencies and just dumb retcons it makes my brain hurt.
fricking stupid wrongo. Fallout 1 & 2 fanatic here, the show is the best homage to the originals than any other piece of Fallout media.
Frick off moron they missed the tone completely
>If you remember 1, 2 and NV, you'll notice so many plot holes, lore incosistencies and just dumb retcons it makes my brain hurt.
Even if you have you can just ignore them for the same reason you can ignore these issues when watching the Jackson Lord of the Rings trilogy or the Raimi Spider-Man trilogy.
You kinda can't, because Todd Howard deemed this show canon. So it would be like ignoring The Last Jedi in the SW canon. Now every Fallout game moving forward has to dance around this lore minefield.
The only major plot hole I came away with was the fact it's never explained why the cold fusion scientist woman was somehow still alive and appears unchanged 200 years after the great war.
Other than that I thought the biggest weakness was being too close to the games- If you knew the lore of the games you saw half the plot points coming up from the first episode. People who don't know the games and lore will think more highly of the show because they won't realise most of the strongest plot elements are just copied over from the games.
The fact alone that there are million unopened vaults in California makes the plot of Fallout 1 dumb. Also, somehow, all the people in California reverted back 200 years, just because Shady Sands was nuked via asspull. And Enclave is still around, even though NCR wiped them out 50 years ago. And the mcguffin plot is stupid once you realize what the GECK does and NCR has at least 3 GECK-powered cities in their territory.
The fact that such powerhouse as NCR disappeared overnight, I'm just going to ignore. But where are the other factions?
I liked that about the show. You could tell the scene with the overseer was a dialogue choice scene and he got mad when she asked the wrong question. The structure of the plot follows the quest structure of the games.
1 is my second favorite game of all time and I think the show's pretty good. The series has arguably been inconsistent at least in terms of tone since the very second game, there hasn't been any point in getting hung up on this kind of thing since before most of the series' fans were born at this stage. I don't think it's amazing or anything, but a disproportionate amount of the criticism it's gotten online is just New Vegas fans getting up in arms about its perceived slights against two games most of them haven't even played (and would probably hate if they did).
>even israelite worshipping grifter #352 liked the newest DEI slop so you HAVE to watch it
No.
I dont hate him and listen to his stuff while doing chores sometimes, but man you cannot take this guy too seriously and his schtick gets old quickly
The funniest part to me was when he lists some older obscure movies as his favorite movies, because as "le serious mobie critic" he had to say that. Just say its die hard and terminator 2, nobody cares you pretentious butthole
>he lists some older obscure movies as his favorite movies, because as "le serious mobie critic" he had to say that.
What movies did he list?
>Even the drinker loved it
dude is after a job at the daily wire
Ben needs a new Shabbos goy to replace Candace.
Drinker loved the gay romance episode of TLOU too so
Jesus this board is probably the most schizo after /misc/, what the frick. Even the vidya boards aren't this bad. What is going on here.
The most badass character in the show is a white straight male. Morally the message of the story was anti-corporatist, but distinctly and specifically not leftist (because the message was pro-liberal, and liberals are not leftists).
I really don't understand why you morons are having such a rage piss fit over this show as though you are going to get anything other than milquetoast tokenism from mainstream media. The show was entertaining.
This particular YouTubuer has always been a "muh feels" midwit. The stuff he gets angry about has always been based on gut reaction with no intelligent reasoning behind it. A stuck clock is right twice a day and all that.
No one cares shill
go back
imagine watching a show just because the main good guy is straight white male
Half you homosexual troon complaints are about muh racemixing muh israeli cuckolding /misc/ bullshit. Having a straight white guy as the clear "fan favourite" lead is the counterpoint to all that.
I don't like anything and I liked this show, so I know for 110% certain that you homosexuals are just being contrarian buttholes and the full depth of your reasoning not to like it is that it has a black guy in it.
Shut the frick up you dishonest troon homosexual.
Nobody is raging rapejeet, the show is just badly written
Not the worst in the world but gets hardcarried by gore, the setting and existing lore
>story written by rad lefty antiloberal culturalists to be extra sensitive to those sensibilities because anything less is not tolerated by the Hollywood socialists
>show is pushed by anti-liberal corporate lefty media and corporate AAA studio known for abusing its own staff
>leftygay on the Reddit tab of Cinemaphile: it’s clearly for liberals!
You need more gas for this lighting.
>(because the message was pro-liberal, and liberals are not leftists).
LOL
I won't watch a single media with pronoun shit in it. It will never be normal.
>Drinker
He has an extremely unattractive speaking voice and mannerisms. I don't understand how you can watch his videos.
This gay is buddies with Nolan's brother, that why he is defending this shit.
His opinions is not to be trusted.
No-one here worships drinker like you worship Bezos’ 4 inch wiener, shill. Frick off and die
Is this guy actually a scottish drunk or just larping as one?
The name is just a lazy pun on "critical thinker" and his videos have always been a cringeworthy attempt at being a jaded cynic, without any of the charisma required to pull that off.
he is actually scottish but that's not what he sounds like, he puts on a moronic character voice to appeal to youtube americans.
The thing I like most about the show is it makes fun of the Managerial State. It pokes fun at the fat short mulatto tard and the nerd for thinking they could become leader through an election. I noticed that they make fun of a lot of progressive stuff by shielding themselves behind an excess of Black folk and the troony in the first episode. They filled their quota up front and the show was free to do whatever
Chud media analysis is wild. Do you have a little notepad with tally marks keeping score if the whites or the blacks won an Fallout?
Youtubers are all child molesters. No exception.
It was ok but hardly the masterpiece that some people say it is. I'm not upset that the 2nd season isn't out until 2026
Look, I'm sure Amazon paid alot of rupees to get all these threads made, but I'm just not watching your pozzed slop, I'm sorry bro I really am bit I'm just not watching it
ER is the only reviewer homosexual I tolerate
that's still one too many, homosexual
>Gary Stu's are good
What an unbelievable bad take from him. Him defending fricking Kirito of all characters was when I realized I had to stop watching
how anyone can watch this youtube slop I do not get
>lmao dude check out episode 867 of this guy doing the same shit drunk impression
the show is still a 3/10 even if you haven't played the games, just admit the drinker isn't very smart and can fall for slop
>How does it feel to be on the wrong side of history?
Well, normalgay masses also like Bethesda Fallouts too. Doesn't mean they are "right".
Dude is also a gay that's desperately trying to get in the entertainment industry
the aye lmao girl is not 2/2 in game adaptations. At this point she'd play tifa in the inevitable FF adaptation.
Nobody post her boobs.
Feels good man.
bros have we lost?? i have noticed that even the based have said they loved all the recent slop it started with Dune which i honestly expected people to go against the woke message and now the same people praise fricking fallout? What the hell is going on?
our chud powers are waning
Even dumbass Despot called Dune 2 a masterpiece
should i be concerned about my bf watching this show? he rated the main girl a 6/10 but i feel like hes lying and its higher ;;_;;
she's a 6/10 but she has Bug-eyed and Meme Frog perks that make her prettier
ugh sickening
it feels nice to unsubscribe from him and never respect anything he ever says anything again, even if its correct.
There have been a few times where The Drinker has shown is absolutely terrible taste in media, and this is one of them