The corridor crew guys have been playing with AI animations (using a few reference photos and mocap).
Results are rough for now, but give it 5 years and we'll see a deluge of poor quality animated films (think the shitty straight to video versions of famous Disney movies).
Good or bad for animation and cartoons?
I can see this being an android situation where the technology is so accessible and easy to use that there are literally thousands of shitty mobile games released a day. Only for cartoons.
?t=549
CRIME Shirt $21.68 |
You will never be a real artist. You have no skill, you have no knowledge of the essentials, you have no artstyle. You are a portfolio-less man twisted by laziness and software into a crude mockery of nature’s perfection.
All the (You)'s you get are two-faced and half-hearted. Behind your back anons mock you. Drawgays are disgusted and ashamed of you, your “fellow anons” laugh at your ghoulish multi-limbed generations behind 7 proxies
Artists are utterly repulsed by you. Thousands of years of artwork have allowed men to sniff out ai frauds with incredible efficiency. Even generated pics that “pass” look uncanny and unnatural to the viewer. The eyes and mangled appendages are a dead giveaway. And even if you manage to get a coomer to commission you, he’ll turn tail and bolt the second he gets a peak of the eldritch horror AI passes as a vegana.
You will never feel the satisfaction of drawing. You wrench out a fake smile with every soulless stolen picture you generate and tell yourself it’s your work, but deep inside you feel the truth creeping up like a deadline, ready to crush you under the unbearable weight.
Eventually it’ll be too much to bear - you’ll delete the software, deactivate your socials, delete all of "your work", and plunge into the cold abyss that is pestering artgays for weird fetish art. Your anons won't remember your name but will relieved that they no longer have to live with ai spam. They’ll make a throwback thread talking about the dark era of ai and every anon for the rest of Cinemaphile will know you were an imposter who couldn't draw. Your generations will 404 and go back to the archive, and all that will remain of your legacy is garbage that is unmistakably artificial.
This is your fate. This is what you chose. There is no turning back.
Why can you creatures never into irony?
Because it was irony that stuck us with Drumpf!
I kinda agree and all that, but there's an irony to this becoming a copypasta lmao
It's an edit of an existing copypasta, how is that ironic?
>Anyone can do it (so long as they have a dedicated studio and render farm) it's so accessible!
lol. lmao
... The corridor crew guys have 3 guys running apple macs.
They have three guys as the face of the team but but if you think they're the only people there you should rewatch that Batgirl video they did. They're a production studio. A small one, but a studio nonetheless.
Imagine being this much of an intentionally incorrect Black person
>Chat GPT wrote the OP
Don't the Corridor guys dickride a lot of z-list celebrities like influencers and streamers? Or am I thinking of some similar outfit? I ask because, if that's the case, whatever they achieve could just end up being a vehicle for some trashy wannabe who brings down the whole project.
Can somebody post a mega of the AI slop?
Looks lame.
Come back in 5 years, if it's any good then, I might give it a chance
> Looks lame.
> Come back in 5 years, if it's any good then, I might give it a chance
> Results are rough for now, but give it 5 years
Reading is tough, huh?
Not as tough as plowing your mom homosexual.
My mom's black, which would make you a Black person lover. Check mate.
And you're gonna call this Black person lover Daddy kiddo. Spread them cheeks, you seem like a willful little buck in need of some breakin'
Thankfully Spider-Verse already eased audiences into the "intentionally ugly incomprehensible jittery mess" look, phew studios were almost forced to go back to hand drawn 2D animation
this
I was astonished how ugly the new movie looked
they are literally prepping us for ai made mcontent
thank god you're blind
I hate the framerate in that fricking movie. It's insane how we are litterally going backwards.
Seethe more, man, your hate boner isn’t obvious in the slightest here.
It's all garbage. In fact the digital slop, 3D, and CGI of the last two decades prepped consoomers for the garbage that will be AI "art."
To see good stuff you have to go back to at least the 1990s, and the 30s-60s were the height of comics, animation, and illustration (aesthetically).
Please stop pushing the cancerous "everything is shit, why care" philosophy because you have to blatantly ignore everything good in the industry to keep it going.
Don't bother, anon. You can't really help people out of a mindset that not only conveniently cancels the worth of what they're incapable of understanding or achieving, but also grants itself superiority by the sheer delusion of myopia rationalized as "big picture" vision.
>everything good in the industry
What's good? Comic series in pic related are some of my faves, and most are at least a few decades old. I still come across the occasional good new comic. I don't even keep up with animation anymore, even the ads make me cringe.
The problem is digital production, coloring in most comics is shit, most animation looks like shit because of over-reliance on 3D, CGI, etc. Movies look like video games. There's no character in anything. AI will worsen the trend.
Okay that explains it, you're a "stylization is god" type and what you have to understand is that some styles can ONLY work in flat 2d media without becoming massive money sinks. Some artists' motifs simply don't gel with animation and much less with live-action and that's not the faults of those mediums.
I see. So you jerk off to gore.
Does AI really need to improve that much to just put blood in places?
>So you jerk off to gore.
Ah, the gorefest that was...Jimmy Corrigan? Let me guess, you only read Planetary and Watchmen.
The other guy is a shithead but you're embarrassing, like half of them don't even feature gore.
>The walking dead
>Spawn (lmao you genuinly have brainrot if you enjoy this)
>WE3
>The Immortal iron fist
>Dinotopia
>Doom patrol
>Prison pit
These should all not be here. There are a few other that I have not read here that I can't comment but this list is fricking shit. 1/3 deserve to be on a list like this.
Arcane is good
it will be the greatest time for writers
AI will always produce derivative scripts since it's not capable of creating its own thoughts
we idea guys are about to be rolling in it
Is there an AI that asks you for worldbuilding information information to and it spits out a script or something?
I had a homebrew that required me to come up with a fictional fast food chain recently. I figured I'd ask GPT to come up with some fictional burger chain ideas.
It's top two suggestions? Shake Shack and SmashBurger.
Yeah if they want to make AI entertainment mainstream we're gonna need a federal level legalization of cannabis.
Drag AIBlack folk into the street and lynch them
homies cryin lmao
Do you have anything else going on in your life or are you always this miserable?
GOOD MORNING SIR
How is a filter slapped on live-action "animation"?
Snow white was rotoscoped and you loved that.
Damn, did people look like this in 1937? The GD sure took a toll
yeah, rotoscope over hand drawn animation
Huh?
Some characters were (the humans mostly, SW included but not the dwarfs for example obviously
), because the artists were fricking dying on their feet while trying to pull off the monumental task of doing a feature-length film for the first time and upgrading their ability to depict really believable human characters at the same time. So despite the protests of a sizable part of the team, they were asked to stop analyzing the reference footage and actually trace over it. Some did, some partially did, some didn't.
The irony is that this argument is often brought up to "prove" that rotoscoping is the same thing as animation, but what it proves it that rotoscoping is what you have to do when you simply fall short of the required skill to do animation. Of course, the following 3/4 of a century of reference material actually used as reference material is conveniently ignored.
People who want to acknowledge the value of rotoscoping and actually know what they're talking about (or simply, don't just intent to use rotoscoping as a self-serving endall argument to compare the op slop with what animation actually is as a creative medium) bring up better examples like "When the Day Breaks".
>but what it proves it that rotoscoping is what you have to do when you simply fall short of the required skill to do animation
Yes? It's a time saver.
Kinda, in the way that fapping is a "time saver" compared to sex and definitely cuts back the required buildup of skill and dedication to make it happen. They may of course overlap in what you may be interested in getting off it (pun intended) and that's fine, while definitely missing what others value but you don't (or can't), a fact that shouldn't be ignored. And granted, many, MANY people may never find out the difference, in some bizarre cases out of a delusion of personal choice built on the notion that a limited perspective grants a different point of view, rather than a lack of one.
2D>Live Action
Anyway rotoscope will never be real animation just like tracing will never be real drawing so frick off AI pajeets!
>recycling this old topic
Slow day, huh?
>Disney will now be able to pump out slop at 20x speed
>Indie shit will be clogged with twelve years olds making a thousand fan animations of the latest schlog horror vidya or analog crap
>Porn will be filled with even more AI c**ts in generic poses
Yeah no only great stuff I see
will now be able to pump out slop at 20x speed
Good, that will hasten their inevitable collapse
shit will be clogged with twelve years olds making a thousand fan animations of the latest schlog horror vidya or analog crap
Will hasten the inevitable collapse of youtube
>>Porn will be filled with even more AI c**ts in generic poses
Thats the most annoying part, pixiv and r34 are totally flooded with AI slop, the catalogue was repetitive already now its 10x worse. Entire pages are now just blurry waifu bullshit
at least the furries at e6 had the brains to ban AI to protect their site
>at least the furries at e6 had the brains to ban AI to protect their site
They banned AIslop on furaffinity too, it's kinda funny how weebs are worse than furries.
>but give it 5 years
>two more weeks!
Uh huh
>our original "we changed everything" narrative was blasted to fricking oblivion so now turns out we were doing something entirely new all along
LM actual AO
Gotta hand it to them, when they miss the point the do it at peak fricking high capacity
kys third world shills
Didn't A Scanner Darkly do this shit almost 20 years ago?
It didn't change everything as much and and thoroughly as this is literally doing
It also looked like shit
I hope AI becomes fricking illegal
We have enough generic slop already
>homies cryin lmao
Use the version relevant by this point of the "debate" anon
Boring
It'll be mostly Youtube content, only the stuff made by people with an actual creative spark will hit anything resembling retail. Honestly, I'm not against the idea of AI being a supplementary tool for things like in-betweens or quick and dirty storyboarding but the problem is that the conversation's been hijacked by people who aren't artists. The loudest voices are people who are absurdly bitter at artists and want to make this about replacing people which is really petty and shows that all they care about is the output and not the work that got it there.
he did not addressed the legal issues with using Vampire Hunter D Bloodlust footage to train their algorythm
Unions BTFO