>Woody, Rex, Ham, Lenny and the soldiers were present at the screening >yet they don't know who Buzz is when he arrives after the birthday party >Andy has the three eyed alien toys >when he only got them at the end of 2
For a movie that constantly wants to rewrite the canon for the series, it sure knows shit about it
Wait a frick. If they saw the movie, why were they so surprised when Buzz arrived?
>Autistic Kid brings his toys >Of course his parents leave him there alone while they yell each other about divorcing. >Kid not only hogs the chairs on his side for his toys, he also has the need to put some in the chairs in front. >On top of that, the sperg came with a cowboy hat that won’t let people from behind see the movie. >He also puts his dirty shoes in the chair.
>morons think this painting is indication that this actually happened
>Autistic Kid brings his toys >Of course his parents leave him there alone while they yell each other about divorcing. >Kid not only hogs the chairs on his side for his toys, he also has the need to put some in the chairs in front. >On top of that, the sperg came with a cowboy hat that won’t let people from behind see the movie. >He also puts his dirty shoes in the chair.
You just know that some 22yo came up with this concept.
Young people today are unable to comprehend the idea that toys could exist without being a small piece of a larger multimedia brand you can form a consumption identity around (star wars, marvel, etc.).
They see Toy Story 1 and their brains are unable to ingest the fact that Buzz was just a toy, and was advertised with a commercial for just the toy. So they introduced this retcon to fit Buzz into a larger multimedia brand like they're comfortable with and their cognitive dissonance can be resolved.
Watch Toy Story 1 again. The events of OP's pic are incompatible with the events of the film.
This is a blatant attempt to rewrite Buzz's origins to fit a modern Disney narrative for establishing brands.
>release a movie >buy merchandise based on the movie >watch the next movie >buy more merchandise >repeat forever
They don't want anyone thinking that characters and toys can exist outside of this pipeline of movies first and then products based on the movies, because that's how Disney operates.
It was already established that Buzz Lightyear was part of a greater franchise. The toy commercial in TS1 even stated "The world's greatest superhero is now the world's greatest toy"
Buzz is anything but a superhero in this, and the orginal creators intended him to be from an old action cartoon Andy watched on TV. Whether Star Command is the originalnor the reboot after the toylines success, Lightyear isn't what Buzz originates from. Frick what these hacks say over twenty years later.
>It was already established that Buzz Lightyear was part of a greater franchise
I'm not disputing that possibility. It was pretty standard for old toy franchises to work that way (GI Joe, Transformers, even making fun of it in Jingle All the Way). What I'm arguing is that this is retconing that franchise to be a MODERN DISNEY-SPECIFIC format to conform young minds into thinking that characters and toys originate from films and that all toys are subsequent follow-up products to a film you saw in a theater.
Did it say anywhere in the press that Buzz Lightyear couldn't have existed before the Lightyear movie came out in-universe? All I see them say is that Andy saw the movie and became obsessed, like a how a kid could've watched Batman in 1989 and became obsessed.
2 years ago
Anonymous
All I see is Disney trying to tie a new movie into an older film franchise for nostalgiabux, and doing a shit job at it. Don't make any excuses for Disney. >inb4 who's making excuses
You didn't, but you sound like you're about to. Spare us.
>It was already established that Buzz Lightyear was part of a greater franchise
I'm not disputing that possibility. It was pretty standard for old toy franchises to work that way (GI Joe, Transformers, even making fun of it in Jingle All the Way). What I'm arguing is that this is retconing that franchise to be a MODERN DISNEY-SPECIFIC format to conform young minds into thinking that characters and toys originate from films and that all toys are subsequent follow-up products to a film you saw in a theater.
Thats a basic commercial line. Are you stupid or something? Thats exactly how a 90s commercial would talk about Batman for example.
My hope was that everything in the movie was just the adventure he THOUGHT he experienced while he's gaining conciousness after getting built, or he actually went through at the toy factory however being "delusional" about the events. And in the end he's stepping through a light or some shit and ends up where he and Woody meet, in a scene that's a remake from the first, showing off how far CGI has come.
But noone gives a shit since I don't have Twitter fame, and I don't make movies even though they'd be superior. so... frick everything I guess.
Why are the three green aliens with him? He got them after getting Buzz for his birthday and the only reason he got Buzz was (supposedly) this movie, so...
This guy has the right idea. All of you are acting like the Lightyear movie was the first Buzz Lightyear thing that ever existed in-universe. Where's the proof of that?
Toy Story 1 was originally made with this alternate opening in mind so this unused reel is more canon for why Andy likes Buzz than this shitty movie no one would watch in either 1995 or 2022.
Toy Story 1 was originally made with this alternate opening in mind so this unused reel is more canon for why Andy likes Buzz than this shitty movie no one would watch in either 1995 or 2022.
>Andy can't be a fan of the movie and the cartoon of Buzz Lightyear at the same time
You must be real boring people.
Why not? People accept the existence of bad adaptations of beloved franchises all the time
2 years ago
Anonymous
They didn't try tying the Mario Bros movie into the game canon, it was a standalone piece, like what Lightyear is. It's only after the fact that they attempt to shoehorn it into the Toy Story universe. Stop sucking Disney's balls.
2 years ago
Anonymous
So it's a part of the Toy Story universe. Big fricking deal. It's not like it changed anything, so stop whining like a b***h.
2 years ago
Anonymous
I'm not whining. I'm just pointing out how badly they fumbled making a Lightyear film and how poorly it fit into the canon of Toy Story, so frick them. Keep gargling that mouse cum, boyo.
Take a wild guess on who owns and controls the canon there
hint: it sure as frick isnt you
2 years ago
Anonymous
John Lasseter, that's why 4 and Lightyear aren't canon.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Disney also owns the Star Wars canon. Doesn't negate the previous canon existing. Frick who owns it. Frick listening to them. You can't tell me what to enjoy or acknowledge as legitimate.
2 years ago
Anonymous
Just wait till Disney remakes the original trilogy.
Amazon is going to do it to James Bond and Lord of the Rings
2 years ago
Anonymous
And I will be there saying frick them both respectively. Just because of some legal mumbo jumbo these corporations own the properties, they don't suddenly become the writers and artists who intially made the works. Just because some rich prick owns a painting doesn't mean thry get to retell the initial story and meaning behind it. Frick Hollywood.
If Woody saw the movie with Andy, why didn't he bring up its existence to Buzz when he thought he was a space ranger? Just show him a poster or play a VHS Andy would have laying somewhere to prove him once and for all that he is not even a toy, but a product of fiction.
1) Andy's mom would not allow this.
2) Andy would not do this.
3) Andy did not receive the green aliens until the end of Toy Story 2, AFTER he had Buzz.
4) Woody would not want to watch this movie.
True sigma male right there.
>hey it's a toy of that movie Andy took us to
>is it the robot cat?
>no
>phew
Why does Andy look like a teen here? And why does he have the green aliens already?
>property of star command
What kind of twink is he that he will wear a shirt in public asserting that his boipussy is owned by some dom?
He’s asserting dominance over those without a black shemale lover
>Woody, Rex, Ham, Lenny and the soldiers were present at the screening
>yet they don't know who Buzz is when he arrives after the birthday party
>Andy has the three eyed alien toys
>when he only got them at the end of 2
For a movie that constantly wants to rewrite the canon for the series, it sure knows shit about it
FRICK
YOUR
CHILDHOOD
>morons think this painting is indication that this actually happened
>pic made to shill the movie and temper fans criticism
>n-no it didn't happen like that!
>Toy are sentiently watching the movie among humans
I guess Andy knew they were alive all along then?
Nah hes just autistic, why else would the theater allow it
No theater in their right mind would let a kid take up 3 seats like that.
If they bought the tickets they wouldn't give a shit
Wait a frick. If they saw the movie, why were they so surprised when Buzz arrived?
Probably been sold out for months with Andy searching stores frantically, so maybe they where surprised his mom was able to even get one?
1:39
DON'T QUESTION IT
JUST CONSOOM AND CLAP
>t redlettertard
I hate this "chalky" drawing shit, makes everyone look like a shitty moe anime shit. Seems like a rushed drawing as the perspectives are off.
>Autistic Kid brings his toys
>Of course his parents leave him there alone while they yell each other about divorcing.
>Kid not only hogs the chairs on his side for his toys, he also has the need to put some in the chairs in front.
>On top of that, the sperg came with a cowboy hat that won’t let people from behind see the movie.
>He also puts his dirty shoes in the chair.
Did Andy get bullied a lot as a kid? This seems like the kind of shit kids would gang up on him for
We last saw him playing toys with a little kid before going off to art school. His favorite toy was a fricking cowboy. No shit he was a misfit.
>An openly homosexual scene in a movie watched by children in 1993
There would be absolute moral panic
95*
You just know that some 22yo came up with this concept.
Young people today are unable to comprehend the idea that toys could exist without being a small piece of a larger multimedia brand you can form a consumption identity around (star wars, marvel, etc.).
They see Toy Story 1 and their brains are unable to ingest the fact that Buzz was just a toy, and was advertised with a commercial for just the toy. So they introduced this retcon to fit Buzz into a larger multimedia brand like they're comfortable with and their cognitive dissonance can be resolved.
What retcon? The Buzz Lightyear of Star Command cartoon existed 20 years ago to do the same thing.
Watch Toy Story 1 again. The events of OP's pic are incompatible with the events of the film.
This is a blatant attempt to rewrite Buzz's origins to fit a modern Disney narrative for establishing brands.
>release a movie
>buy merchandise based on the movie
>watch the next movie
>buy more merchandise
>repeat forever
They don't want anyone thinking that characters and toys can exist outside of this pipeline of movies first and then products based on the movies, because that's how Disney operates.
It was already established that Buzz Lightyear was part of a greater franchise. The toy commercial in TS1 even stated "The world's greatest superhero is now the world's greatest toy"
Buzz is anything but a superhero in this, and the orginal creators intended him to be from an old action cartoon Andy watched on TV. Whether Star Command is the originalnor the reboot after the toylines success, Lightyear isn't what Buzz originates from. Frick what these hacks say over twenty years later.
Did it say anywhere in the press that Buzz Lightyear couldn't have existed before the Lightyear movie came out in-universe? All I see them say is that Andy saw the movie and became obsessed, like a how a kid could've watched Batman in 1989 and became obsessed.
All I see is Disney trying to tie a new movie into an older film franchise for nostalgiabux, and doing a shit job at it. Don't make any excuses for Disney.
>inb4 who's making excuses
You didn't, but you sound like you're about to. Spare us.
>It was already established that Buzz Lightyear was part of a greater franchise
I'm not disputing that possibility. It was pretty standard for old toy franchises to work that way (GI Joe, Transformers, even making fun of it in Jingle All the Way). What I'm arguing is that this is retconing that franchise to be a MODERN DISNEY-SPECIFIC format to conform young minds into thinking that characters and toys originate from films and that all toys are subsequent follow-up products to a film you saw in a theater.
Thats a basic commercial line. Are you stupid or something? Thats exactly how a 90s commercial would talk about Batman for example.
My hope was that everything in the movie was just the adventure he THOUGHT he experienced while he's gaining conciousness after getting built, or he actually went through at the toy factory however being "delusional" about the events. And in the end he's stepping through a light or some shit and ends up where he and Woody meet, in a scene that's a remake from the first, showing off how far CGI has come.
But noone gives a shit since I don't have Twitter fame, and I don't make movies even though they'd be superior. so... frick everything I guess.
>Thats exactly how a 90s commercial would talk about Batman for example.
Yes, Batman, a character from a pre-exisitng franchise
Why are the three green aliens with him? He got them after getting Buzz for his birthday and the only reason he got Buzz was (supposedly) this movie, so...
Maybe its like the Toxic Avenger, they took a movie not at all meant for kids and turned it into a toy line and television show
Then they should've contacted Lloyd Kaufman about making a Buzz Lightyear movie.
I always saw Buzz Lightyear as being like Ninja Turtles, the Toy came first then they crafted the show and video game around it.
With Ninja Turtles the comics came first in 84, then the cartoon in 87, the toy line in 88, and the movie in 1990.
This guy has the right idea. All of you are acting like the Lightyear movie was the first Buzz Lightyear thing that ever existed in-universe. Where's the proof of that?
How does he have the aliens? He didn't get them until the end of 2
He didn't actually bring his toys to the movies, like so many of these morons want to think.
The art in OP is official promotional art
He didn't go to the movies Buzz was meant to be a cartoon toy.
This.
Toy Story 1 was originally made with this alternate opening in mind so this unused reel is more canon for why Andy likes Buzz than this shitty movie no one would watch in either 1995 or 2022.
Pixar had an understandable reason to replace that intro, but that was some great action. Shame it was never animated.
>Andy can't be a fan of the movie and the cartoon of Buzz Lightyear at the same time
You must be real boring people.
Anyone who likes the cartoon would probably hate the movie. You'd have to be a real boring person to think the movie is any good.
>canon must adhere to this shlock NuDisney sharted out
How about no.
Anon is currently sucking Disney's dick, especially considering canon shat out by stoned boomer Disney executives as a joke.
Why not? People accept the existence of bad adaptations of beloved franchises all the time
They didn't try tying the Mario Bros movie into the game canon, it was a standalone piece, like what Lightyear is. It's only after the fact that they attempt to shoehorn it into the Toy Story universe. Stop sucking Disney's balls.
So it's a part of the Toy Story universe. Big fricking deal. It's not like it changed anything, so stop whining like a b***h.
I'm not whining. I'm just pointing out how badly they fumbled making a Lightyear film and how poorly it fit into the canon of Toy Story, so frick them. Keep gargling that mouse cum, boyo.
Take a wild guess on who owns and controls the canon there
hint: it sure as frick isnt you
John Lasseter, that's why 4 and Lightyear aren't canon.
Disney also owns the Star Wars canon. Doesn't negate the previous canon existing. Frick who owns it. Frick listening to them. You can't tell me what to enjoy or acknowledge as legitimate.
Just wait till Disney remakes the original trilogy.
Amazon is going to do it to James Bond and Lord of the Rings
And I will be there saying frick them both respectively. Just because of some legal mumbo jumbo these corporations own the properties, they don't suddenly become the writers and artists who intially made the works. Just because some rich prick owns a painting doesn't mean thry get to retell the initial story and meaning behind it. Frick Hollywood.
If Woody saw the movie with Andy, why didn't he bring up its existence to Buzz when he thought he was a space ranger? Just show him a poster or play a VHS Andy would have laying somewhere to prove him once and for all that he is not even a toy, but a product of fiction.
>Property of Star Command
Subtle.
1) Andy's mom would not allow this.
2) Andy would not do this.
3) Andy did not receive the green aliens until the end of Toy Story 2, AFTER he had Buzz.
4) Woody would not want to watch this movie.
5) Woody got wood.