Not him, and I don't know what they call it, but he's right. Before the puzzles, there's always a 'toss-up' puzzle where letters are revealed one at a time (not all the Ss at once) and you can buzz in whenever. The winner of those rounds is who goes first in the main round.
Are you serious? the real answer is some shit that's so ghetto florida I can't even believe is real I had to look that up. Anyone who ever ate that is not entering the middle class for 3 generations
I can't imagine going on this show with the hopes of turning your life around with the prize money, only to realize as the buzzer sounds that its right back to the wagie cage for you
Meatball means spaghetti and spaghetti is Italian and Rome is in Italy, ipso facto
the Roman Kitchen is a famous archeological marvel and thus priceless
t. moron that also would’ve gotten the first question wrong
1 month ago
Anonymous
existentialism was developed by philosophers and originated with civilization which was developed in Rome. The Self cannot be found in Paris. Camus proved that and Muslims confirm it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Congratulations, you just failed the $100 question and humiliated yourself just like the autist on the show did.
1 month ago
Anonymous
See [...]. The answer is Ikea.
Congrats you only know about consumerist trash and can't even conceive of thinking deeply about a potential trick question.
1 month ago
Anonymous
The first questions are never trick questions. They're always softballs to make you feel comfortable, ease you into things, and add runtime to the show.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Not sure why you phrase this as if it's comprehensive. They're for far more than that. They also make the game playable somewhat (in person and playing along athome) among many different knowledge levels (remember kids and morons exist). They also allow for surprising mistakes like those that are posted in this thread or funny interactions among groups of people playing along at home, if one person gets something 'obvious' wrong. But ofcourse you wouldn't know what it's like to know other people.
1 month ago
Anonymous
See
[...]
Autistic over-thinking. The Buzzfeed part is irrelevant.
. You’re autistically focusing on the wrong part. What really happened is that Millionaire often has one blatant joke answer and three normal answers as seen here
[...]
for the $100 opening question. But in this case
>Cinemaphile morons still try to defend this
they flipped it on him.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>what bird has the largest wingspan?
my rationale:. maybe albatross, but it can't be THAT big if they hang it from your neck.. >wrong. idiot. that's precisely why theyd hang it from your neck
I lost. 🙁
It’s blatantly Ikea. Any other answer requires autistic over-thinking and mental gymnastics which is why the moron fricked himself on the very first question.
at the time of this episode probably fewer than 1 in 5 americans lived within 30 miles of an ikea, ikea was known more for mail order shelving and tables >t. 31 year old boomer
i bought a kitchen recently and ikea is probably the cheapest you can get (although they suck in the uk because they are built with european houses in mind)
its not "a little oddly worded" its just fricking wrong, ikea is affordable and italy is known for its meatballs. its a bullshit ambiguous question made worse by answers that confuse you even more
1 month ago
Anonymous
Ikea is know for their Swedish meatballs, you absolute fricking tard. Are you seriously thinking like a kid and saying Italy = basghetii and meed balls. Embarrassing.
1 month ago
Anonymous
no, you're just autistic. ignore the "can't afford" part. how the frick are you going to take selfies in kitchens, plural, in... any country. and who would do so?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Airbnb allows you to rent expensive villas for $20
1 month ago
Anonymous
See
Congratulations, you just failed the $100 question and humiliated yourself just like the autist on the show did.
. The answer is Ikea.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I've stayed in airbnbs and I don't think that's true. usually the expensive places are expensive to rent, especially now. regardless, would someone really take a selfie in the kitchen of even a really nice airbnb?
1 month ago
Anonymous
that overthinking is why you'd lose on the first question
1 month ago
Anonymous
I've stayed in airbnbs and I don't think that's true. usually the expensive places are expensive to rent, especially now. regardless, would someone really take a selfie in the kitchen of even a really nice airbnb?
oh, also: if it's true that people snap selfies in expensive airbnb kitchens, wouldn't that be equally likely to happen in ANY tourist-destination country?
1 month ago
Anonymous
Nah it’s obviously IKEA, sorry moron.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>italy is known for its meatballs
not really, Ikea's meatballs are much more iconic (even if vastly overrated)
There are restaurants in Italy (can't remember what they're called) that are simply old ladies making a meal in their kitchen and you eat in their dining room.
This.
The question has nothing to do with truth, it is purely about what Buzzfeed has claimed at one point in the past.
If Buzzfeed had a running joke that the sky is green and the question was about that the correct answer would be green even though it's blue irl.
This.
The question has nothing to do with truth, it is purely about what Buzzfeed has claimed at one point in the past.
If Buzzfeed had a running joke that the sky is green and the question was about that the correct answer would be green even though it's blue irl.
Autistic over-thinking. The Buzzfeed part is irrelevant.
No it is clearly Ikea, but the Buzzfeed part is imperative.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Not really. That’s just the part that trips up Cinemaphile autismos.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Yes. Learn to read. The wording is clear that this question is about what Buzzfeed is claiming.
1 month ago
Anonymous
1 month ago
Anonymous
If being able to read means I've autism then so be it.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Again, you’re over-thinking it. Ignore the Buzzfeed part altogether and the answer is still clearly Ikea.
1 month ago
Anonymous
see
No it is clearly Ikea, but the Buzzfeed part is imperative.
1 month ago
Anonymous
The Buzzfeed part doesn’t matter, but you can’t see it due to the ’tism.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Jesus fricking Christ, go back to school and learn sentence structure. The question is clearly asking what Buzzfeed says. You're essentially replying to each of my posts saying "nuh uh".
1 month ago
Anonymous
Because I’m right. You’re autistically focusing on it when it doesn’t matter. Your thought process is off.
1 month ago
Anonymous
No, your thought process is off. Words have meanings and this sentence has a clear meaning.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Yep, that’s the ’tism talking.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Namecalling will not magically make you right, moron.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Well, I am right.
1 month ago
Anonymous
How many posts do you have in this thread? I want you to try and think about the answer and what it may point to. Try to think about that much more than you thought about the ikea question. Otherwise you'll get nowhere.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I will never not correct people that are incorrect. You’re over-thinking it and the Buzzfeed element is completely irrelevant.
1 month ago
Anonymous
I miss the IP counter 🙁
1 month ago
Anonymous
one can very easily make the deduction what buzzfeed would claim without ever having read a buzzfeed article or even knowing what buzzfeed is, however
1 month ago
Anonymous
>If Buzzfeed had a running joke that the sky is green and the question was about that the correct answer would be green even though it's blue irl.
1 month ago
Anonymous
yes, in that case it would be a bullshit question and you could make an argument for why it is
with the question at hand, there is no ambiguity whatsoever though, and one can easily answer it without ever having heard of buzzfeed at all
1 month ago
Anonymous
Would it be? Question about fiction literature are not bullshit so why would a question about Buzzfeed's articles be?
1 month ago
Anonymous
because it would require you to know all buzzfeed articles released ever, as you rightly stated
1 month ago
Anonymous
Wrong.
1 month ago
Anonymous
not that anon but if the question omitted the buzzfeed part I'd still get it immediately.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>kitchens >MEATBALLS
No, it just requires having heard about ikea.
Recognizing the football gag from Charlie Brown does not require you to have read all of those comic strips.
See this is exactly the type of autistic line of thinking I’m talking about.
I think you misunderstood me here. I'm very much of the opinion that the Ikea question was valid, as you can easily omit the buzzfeed part and still come to the same conclusion of it being Ikea. The argument was why another question with a different wording ('what colour buzzfeed claimed the sky was?') would be bullshit and this one wasn't.
1 month ago
Anonymous
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this
because it would require you to know all buzzfeed articles released ever, as you rightly stated
is just a weird thing to think.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>kitchens >MEATBALLS
No, it just requires having heard about ikea.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Recognizing the football gag from Charlie Brown does not require you to have read all of those comic strips.
1 month ago
Anonymous
See this is exactly the type of autistic line of thinking I’m talking about.
>The Buzzfeed part is irrelevant.
How is the Bizzfeed part irrelevant when it's very much the functional core of the question? They didn't ask "Which place is popular for kitchens and meatballs (and Buzzfeed agrees, btw)?". They asked "What does Buzzfeed say about ...?"
1 month ago
Anonymous
Replace Buzzfeed with the New York Times or literally anything else. It’s completely irrelevant to getting the answer right. See
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this [...] is just a weird thing to think.
. You’re autistically zeroing in on the wrong thing.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Replace Buzzfeed with the New York Times or literally anything else.
No. It makes a massive difference whether something gets reported by the NYT or by BuzzFeed. You have reason to assume that a somewhat serious source like the NYT would base their reports on factual evidence.
BuzzFeed, on the other hand, is known for making up completely unfactual bullshit. How am I to know that they didn't release an article about kitchens and meatballs in Rome? It's quite credible that they would.
1 month ago
Anonymous
You are over-thinking like a literal minded autist. Refer back to
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this [...] is just a weird thing to think.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>You are over-thinking
Sorry, but no, it's not over-thinking. It's taking the question at face value. They do quite literally ask about BuzzFeed, first and foremost.
1 month ago
Anonymous
You're just an idiot
1 month ago
Anonymous
You absolutely are over-thinking it which is why you would’ve failed on the first question and answered Rome.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>you would’ve failed on the first question and answered Rome.
No, I would not have. You're apparently both too stupid to understand what the question asked for (as in, actually asked for rather than what might have been implied by the context) and what I'm arguing here. Not a single time did I advocate for the answer "Rome". I'm advocating that NONE of the answers seem more sensible than the others, given the thing the question asks for. Namely a Buzzfeed article.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Nope, autistic, literal minded over-thinking is your problem. I’m going to once again refer you back to
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this [...] is just a weird thing to think.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Okay, genius, tell me: What exactly DID the question ask for, in your opinion? Let's see what your basic literacy level is.
1 month ago
Anonymous
See
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this [...] is just a weird thing to think.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Travel to a place that serve meatballs and has a large selection of kitchens in the wild >Uuuhhh... Rome?
1 month ago
Anonymous
So if the NYT was quoted in the question, you would believe the answer?
But since the question quoted BuzzFeed, instead of a reputable source, you think the answer is wrong.
That’s amazing.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>So if the NYT was quoted in the question, you would believe the answer?
If the NYT was quoted, the question wouldn't be worded so poorly to begin with (sounding indeed like a buzzfeed article).
But, yes, I'd argue that if a question did quote the NYT, one could trust that such a publication would try sticking to the facts and not make quite as ridiculous claims. Therefore, the idea that the article quoted might be bullshit might not come up at all, or at least could be argued against based on a general appeal to journalistic integrity.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Question: "What did the New York Times say ..."
Thought process: >1) Well, anything other than IKEA sounds ridiculous. >2) The New York Times wouldn't want to publish ridiculous statements. >3) Therefore, the New York Times almost certainly said this about IKEA rather than the other options.
>Question: "What did BuzzFeed say ..."
Thought process: >1) Well, anything other than IKEA sounds ridiculous. >2) BuzzFeed publishes ridiculous statements all the time. >3) Shit, I don't know. It could basically be anything.
Yeah, but going by that logic, any of the answers could have been correct. In fact, "IKEA", as the least moronic of those four answers, would be the least likely correct answer.
It doesn't matter if they do, the point is to turn an otherwise debatable question into a verifiable yes/no. A lot of gameshows and trivia do it, usually with better things than buzzfeed like dictionaries or newspapers but this is also the silly first question.
>usually with better things than buzzfeed like dictionaries or newspapers
Yes. That's the point. BuzzFeed should not be used as a point of reference (or worse: source) for independently knowable facts.
That alone makes this question problematic.
What makes it even worse though is that they didn't just use BuzzFeed as a reference, they used it as an inspiration for that question. If you ask yourself how they'd have come up with it, it's pretty clear that they didn't write the question and then did research to confirm it. Instead, someone read a fricking buzzfeed article, thought "hey, that'll make a great question" and took over the exact wording. Basically making the question about a buzzfeed article, not any potential factual foundation behind it.
This deserves to be called out.
>Amerifats are so fat, they need cafeterias in their furniture stores >The furniture stores get to be know FOR their cafeteria items rather than the actual fricking furniture >They feel the need to take selfies in a furniture shop for some reason >Ikea is too expensive for them, despite the fact that Ikea is supposed to be the affordable option >D is usually the joke answer at the beginning, and this is set up like that
I'll never understand the spergy autism over this one. It was blatant. And if you wouldn't have guessed it, you don't know anything about IKEA. And if you think that's not fair, it's a quiz show. That's how it is. And for the non-Americans who b***h about it, this version of the show is for Americans, so why should a foreigner be upset when they don't get something a regular American either would know, or one with trivia knowledge would know? Suck it up. I probably wouldn't know jack shit about TESCO or whatever store your people go to, but it being on a quiz show in your own country wouldn't upset me.
It's one of those early questions where usually the answer can be logically deduced from the question so you don't actually have to know anything about the topic, and there is one ridiculous answer that is different from all the others that cancels itself out.
This one has everything flipped, where the question is an insane mess of buzzwords talking about nothing, and the correct answer is the crazy one that is unlike the rest, so you do have to know about the topic to figure it out.
>so you do have to know about the topic to figure it out.
Nope. See
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this [...] is just a weird thing to think.
Nope. >3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs
That's knowing about the topic.
If you don't know that then the Ikea answer remains insane. Why would anyone take a "trip" to a furniture store to eat meatballs? That makes no sense.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Probably because you’re not from the United States and therefore the U.S. version of the show isn’t directed at you. Any other questions?
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Any other questions?
Just one.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Mmhmm. Frick off, foreigner.
1 month ago
Anonymous
Frick off back to Ikea for another meatball you fat Buzzfeed reading gay.
1 month ago
Anonymous
You definitely pretend to be American on Cinemaphile. Eat shit.
1 month ago
Anonymous
>Eat shit
That would require pretending to be American in real life
>Early phase joke questions >How many thousands are there in a million? A: One B: Ten C: Hundred D: Thousand
Spent her fifty-fifty on it while her friend was cringing to death in the audience >"Math totally isn't one of my strong suits"
TBF that shit is over priced for what it is. I’d rather get something lightly used off FB marketplace or Craigslist that’s 10x the quality for 1/10 the price.
This guy is me, I would've guessed Hollywood Squares because that's the only one I've never heard of. When I think of Hangman I think of drawing the noose, and when I think of Wheel of Fortune I think of spinning the wheel. You'd need to give me a few minutes to realize the letter guessing mechanisms are similar...
You wouldn't have made it, if it's any consolation. My cousins tried out for it once and it's kind of indescribable, the kind of person that they pick. Like they don't feel like real people.
Every single time we have this thread without fail, you have so many "hurrr durrr, how should I know what buzzfeed said?" posts. That is NOT the part that matters. Get it through your thick fricking skulls.
> how would you feel if you hadn't had fresh tropical fruit this morning? > but i did have fresh tropical fruit this morning. why are you saying i didn't?
This is the kind of brown girl that will look like a goblin with her hair up. The stylist did all the heavy lifting framing her face and hiding her skull shape to make her presentable.
There was an episode of Jeopardy! once when a contestant was a technical manual writer for NASA.
She won several games in a row.
In one of her games one of the categories was "Aerospace Slang".
She did not get to ring in a single time on the category. Prick next to her kept beating her to it.
Can I get uhhhhh...G?
WHAT?
T
O
hearty lel
TIO
Doesn't work cuz Ts already there you fricking moron don't you even know the rules
so is S in
sometimes they throw you a freebie.
is it tins? or a parody show
booba
Big tips
Anyone who has never been to IKEA would choose Rome.
Big breasts get Big Tips
>I'd like to solve, Pat.
>Big Phat Motorboatin breasts!
Why’d she do it, bros?
I hope she was comforted by an army of simps. She's so cute.
Such as OP.
N
>person who annoys you
uhhh clam nagger?
Is this a real clip? Would love to see the whole thing with audio.
>and then the object of the game is to find parking
I appreciate that, anon
Oh. Then me like better.
>clue: person
how is it anything other than calm Black person?
calm digger
calm gigger
calm jigger
calm pigger
calm rigger
calm sigger
calm tigger
calm wigger
calm zigger
A clam digger is a person who digs for clams. Clams live and grow under the sand. They made a video game about it and everything.
How is the 45th president of the United States of America related to clam digging?
>No Clam-digger
clam digger.
one who fishes for CLAMs, calm or erratic
plus calm Black person is an oxymoron
>how is it anything other than calm Black person?
well to begin with it starts with clam you dumbass moron
i NEED qt brown gf, society owes me that much
had one. she was insane. miss her dearly.
Grilled Gash Tampon?
>Tampon
you're close. fish tacos
>s
moron
no u.
>freebie
Not him, and I don't know what they call it, but he's right. Before the puzzles, there's always a 'toss-up' puzzle where letters are revealed one at a time (not all the Ss at once) and you can buzz in whenever. The winner of those rounds is who goes first in the main round.
GRULLE BOSH TAZOM
You can take the redneck out the trailer park...
Are you serious? the real answer is some shit that's so ghetto florida I can't even believe is real I had to look that up. Anyone who ever ate that is not entering the middle class for 3 generations
>You can take the redneck out the trailer park...
Fish tacos are the shit
"S" is already there anon
I never heard of fish tacos.
Do you know what fish and tacos are as individual things?
No.
it's called ceviche. Mexican street vendors are hit or miss, delicious or deadly. so it's not super popular.
it's also a euphemism for pussy
>it's called ceviche.
that's an entirely different dish you moron
i love fish tacos and i love eating pussy
coincidence?
>I never heard of fish tacos.
this is why California will always be a flyover state
It was a good guess, to be honest.
you're a moron
>he's never had a heaping helping of grilled taters
Fricking city slickers.
This took me a while. Maybe 'cause I've only had fish tacos from Del Taco, and contain battered and fried fish sticks.
To be fair, that's a toss up round and she clearly was not confident in her answer.
MYTHICAL HERO AY-KALEES
>Uhhhh ayo alex lemme uhh guess furreshuh trobical fruit.
OH N
that was the FIRST question, mind you.
>Cinemaphile morons still try to defend this
I can't imagine going on this show with the hopes of turning your life around with the prize money, only to realize as the buzzer sounds that its right back to the wagie cage for you
What a moronic question
Yes, but the answer is still blatantly Ikea. The guy talked himself out of it with his own autism.
Meatball means spaghetti and spaghetti is Italian and Rome is in Italy, ipso facto
the Roman Kitchen is a famous archeological marvel and thus priceless
t. moron that also would’ve gotten the first question wrong
existentialism was developed by philosophers and originated with civilization which was developed in Rome. The Self cannot be found in Paris. Camus proved that and Muslims confirm it.
Congratulations, you just failed the $100 question and humiliated yourself just like the autist on the show did.
Congrats you only know about consumerist trash and can't even conceive of thinking deeply about a potential trick question.
The first questions are never trick questions. They're always softballs to make you feel comfortable, ease you into things, and add runtime to the show.
Not sure why you phrase this as if it's comprehensive. They're for far more than that. They also make the game playable somewhat (in person and playing along athome) among many different knowledge levels (remember kids and morons exist). They also allow for surprising mistakes like those that are posted in this thread or funny interactions among groups of people playing along at home, if one person gets something 'obvious' wrong. But ofcourse you wouldn't know what it's like to know other people.
See
. You’re autistically focusing on the wrong part. What really happened is that Millionaire often has one blatant joke answer and three normal answers as seen here
for the $100 opening question. But in this case
they flipped it on him.
>what bird has the largest wingspan?
my rationale:. maybe albatross, but it can't be THAT big if they hang it from your neck..
>wrong. idiot. that's precisely why theyd hang it from your neck
I lost. 🙁
How?ikea literally sells the cheapest shit kitchens .
It’s blatantly Ikea. Any other answer requires autistic over-thinking and mental gymnastics which is why the moron fricked himself on the very first question.
at the time of this episode probably fewer than 1 in 5 americans lived within 30 miles of an ikea, ikea was known more for mail order shelving and tables
>t. 31 year old boomer
I think Ikea even has meatballs but I DONT think it's Ikea.. haha you can't trick ME
It was 2015, the era of goofy ikea commercials was already like 10 years prior, ikea was not an obscure company in 2015.
The crazy part of this is the taking selfies in kitchens you "can't afford" part. I mean it's not like Ikea is known for being expensive.
i bought a kitchen recently and ikea is probably the cheapest you can get (although they suck in the uk because they are built with european houses in mind)
The question is a little oddly worded but they just mean those staged kitchen sets you’ll find at large Ikea locations.
its not "a little oddly worded" its just fricking wrong, ikea is affordable and italy is known for its meatballs. its a bullshit ambiguous question made worse by answers that confuse you even more
Ikea is know for their Swedish meatballs, you absolute fricking tard. Are you seriously thinking like a kid and saying Italy = basghetii and meed balls. Embarrassing.
no, you're just autistic. ignore the "can't afford" part. how the frick are you going to take selfies in kitchens, plural, in... any country. and who would do so?
Airbnb allows you to rent expensive villas for $20
See
. The answer is Ikea.
I've stayed in airbnbs and I don't think that's true. usually the expensive places are expensive to rent, especially now. regardless, would someone really take a selfie in the kitchen of even a really nice airbnb?
that overthinking is why you'd lose on the first question
oh, also: if it's true that people snap selfies in expensive airbnb kitchens, wouldn't that be equally likely to happen in ANY tourist-destination country?
Nah it’s obviously IKEA, sorry moron.
>italy is known for its meatballs
not really, Ikea's meatballs are much more iconic (even if vastly overrated)
most twenty-somethings can't afford a kitchen, period
this question is fricking insane
It really isn’t. The answer is clearly Ikea.
It's obviously IKEA and I don't know how you morons get it wrong.
There are restaurants in Italy (can't remember what they're called) that are simply old ladies making a meal in their kitchen and you eat in their dining room.
Can see where his mind was going.
Yeah the mind of a complete autist. Jesus fricking Christ.
>Can see where his mind is going
Its cool to be smart. I just graduated medical school. wear a mask. trust the science
>mfw I don't have any $AUTSM to react to this post
it's obvious to you because you read buzzfeed articles but most people don't
This.
The question has nothing to do with truth, it is purely about what Buzzfeed has claimed at one point in the past.
If Buzzfeed had a running joke that the sky is green and the question was about that the correct answer would be green even though it's blue irl.
Autistic over-thinking. The Buzzfeed part is irrelevant.
No it is clearly Ikea, but the Buzzfeed part is imperative.
Not really. That’s just the part that trips up Cinemaphile autismos.
Yes. Learn to read. The wording is clear that this question is about what Buzzfeed is claiming.
If being able to read means I've autism then so be it.
Again, you’re over-thinking it. Ignore the Buzzfeed part altogether and the answer is still clearly Ikea.
see
The Buzzfeed part doesn’t matter, but you can’t see it due to the ’tism.
Jesus fricking Christ, go back to school and learn sentence structure. The question is clearly asking what Buzzfeed says. You're essentially replying to each of my posts saying "nuh uh".
Because I’m right. You’re autistically focusing on it when it doesn’t matter. Your thought process is off.
No, your thought process is off. Words have meanings and this sentence has a clear meaning.
Yep, that’s the ’tism talking.
Namecalling will not magically make you right, moron.
Well, I am right.
How many posts do you have in this thread? I want you to try and think about the answer and what it may point to. Try to think about that much more than you thought about the ikea question. Otherwise you'll get nowhere.
I will never not correct people that are incorrect. You’re over-thinking it and the Buzzfeed element is completely irrelevant.
I miss the IP counter 🙁
one can very easily make the deduction what buzzfeed would claim without ever having read a buzzfeed article or even knowing what buzzfeed is, however
>If Buzzfeed had a running joke that the sky is green and the question was about that the correct answer would be green even though it's blue irl.
yes, in that case it would be a bullshit question and you could make an argument for why it is
with the question at hand, there is no ambiguity whatsoever though, and one can easily answer it without ever having heard of buzzfeed at all
Would it be? Question about fiction literature are not bullshit so why would a question about Buzzfeed's articles be?
because it would require you to know all buzzfeed articles released ever, as you rightly stated
Wrong.
not that anon but if the question omitted the buzzfeed part I'd still get it immediately.
I think you misunderstood me here. I'm very much of the opinion that the Ikea question was valid, as you can easily omit the buzzfeed part and still come to the same conclusion of it being Ikea. The argument was why another question with a different wording ('what colour buzzfeed claimed the sky was?') would be bullshit and this one wasn't.
1. This is the toss-up easy $100 question
2. Ikea is clearly the odd man out answer
3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs and none of the other answers make much sense when you think about it for more than a second
4. I correctly identify that this is just meant to be a breezy pop culture question
That’s how a normal brain should process it and identify the correct answer. Stuff like this
is just a weird thing to think.
>kitchens
>MEATBALLS
No, it just requires having heard about ikea.
Recognizing the football gag from Charlie Brown does not require you to have read all of those comic strips.
See this is exactly the type of autistic line of thinking I’m talking about.
>The Buzzfeed part is irrelevant.
How is the Bizzfeed part irrelevant when it's very much the functional core of the question? They didn't ask "Which place is popular for kitchens and meatballs (and Buzzfeed agrees, btw)?". They asked "What does Buzzfeed say about ...?"
Replace Buzzfeed with the New York Times or literally anything else. It’s completely irrelevant to getting the answer right. See
. You’re autistically zeroing in on the wrong thing.
>Replace Buzzfeed with the New York Times or literally anything else.
No. It makes a massive difference whether something gets reported by the NYT or by BuzzFeed. You have reason to assume that a somewhat serious source like the NYT would base their reports on factual evidence.
BuzzFeed, on the other hand, is known for making up completely unfactual bullshit. How am I to know that they didn't release an article about kitchens and meatballs in Rome? It's quite credible that they would.
You are over-thinking like a literal minded autist. Refer back to
>You are over-thinking
Sorry, but no, it's not over-thinking. It's taking the question at face value. They do quite literally ask about BuzzFeed, first and foremost.
You're just an idiot
You absolutely are over-thinking it which is why you would’ve failed on the first question and answered Rome.
>you would’ve failed on the first question and answered Rome.
No, I would not have. You're apparently both too stupid to understand what the question asked for (as in, actually asked for rather than what might have been implied by the context) and what I'm arguing here. Not a single time did I advocate for the answer "Rome". I'm advocating that NONE of the answers seem more sensible than the others, given the thing the question asks for. Namely a Buzzfeed article.
Nope, autistic, literal minded over-thinking is your problem. I’m going to once again refer you back to
Okay, genius, tell me: What exactly DID the question ask for, in your opinion? Let's see what your basic literacy level is.
See
>Travel to a place that serve meatballs and has a large selection of kitchens in the wild
>Uuuhhh... Rome?
So if the NYT was quoted in the question, you would believe the answer?
But since the question quoted BuzzFeed, instead of a reputable source, you think the answer is wrong.
That’s amazing.
>So if the NYT was quoted in the question, you would believe the answer?
If the NYT was quoted, the question wouldn't be worded so poorly to begin with (sounding indeed like a buzzfeed article).
But, yes, I'd argue that if a question did quote the NYT, one could trust that such a publication would try sticking to the facts and not make quite as ridiculous claims. Therefore, the idea that the article quoted might be bullshit might not come up at all, or at least could be argued against based on a general appeal to journalistic integrity.
>Question: "What did the New York Times say ..."
Thought process:
>1) Well, anything other than IKEA sounds ridiculous.
>2) The New York Times wouldn't want to publish ridiculous statements.
>3) Therefore, the New York Times almost certainly said this about IKEA rather than the other options.
>Question: "What did BuzzFeed say ..."
Thought process:
>1) Well, anything other than IKEA sounds ridiculous.
>2) BuzzFeed publishes ridiculous statements all the time.
>3) Shit, I don't know. It could basically be anything.
Autistic mental gymnastics and overthinking it.
What the hell is a meatball break then? Can you buy hot meatballs at Ikea?
famously. even he knew that
people literally go to ikea JUST for the meatballs, it's like its most famous thing
They sell them at a loss to get people to come in. Like Costco with its food court and rotisserie chickens.
yea
they're pretty decent too
Was anyone even watching Millionaire by this point? It wasn’t even the same show by that point. How did it stay on the air for so long?
habit watching is a hell of a thing
His evil clone in the background was feeding him the wrong answers
It's a bullshit question but he was such a ponce that I don't feel bad for him.
>things BuzzFeed says
How the hell is anyone supposed to know what kind of moronic shit BuzzFeed says?
>moronic shit
you just answered your own question
Yeah, but going by that logic, any of the answers could have been correct. In fact, "IKEA", as the least moronic of those four answers, would be the least likely correct answer.
no, IKEA is the least interesting (most moronic) thing to write about, therefore it's probably what BuzzFeed wrote about.
It doesn't matter if they do, the point is to turn an otherwise debatable question into a verifiable yes/no. A lot of gameshows and trivia do it, usually with better things than buzzfeed like dictionaries or newspapers but this is also the silly first question.
>usually with better things than buzzfeed like dictionaries or newspapers
Yes. That's the point. BuzzFeed should not be used as a point of reference (or worse: source) for independently knowable facts.
That alone makes this question problematic.
What makes it even worse though is that they didn't just use BuzzFeed as a reference, they used it as an inspiration for that question. If you ask yourself how they'd have come up with it, it's pretty clear that they didn't write the question and then did research to confirm it. Instead, someone read a fricking buzzfeed article, thought "hey, that'll make a great question" and took over the exact wording. Basically making the question about a buzzfeed article, not any potential factual foundation behind it.
This deserves to be called out.
dude. take your mother fricking autism pills
Keep reading BuzzFeed then, imbecile.
I have never read a buzzfeed article but the answer is obvious
>I have never read a buzzfeed article
It shows. You have no idea how unhinged they can be.
Doesn't matter
This was absolute fricking bullshit
>Amerifats are so fat, they need cafeterias in their furniture stores
>The furniture stores get to be know FOR their cafeteria items rather than the actual fricking furniture
>They feel the need to take selfies in a furniture shop for some reason
>Ikea is too expensive for them, despite the fact that Ikea is supposed to be the affordable option
>D is usually the joke answer at the beginning, and this is set up like that
Looks like we’ve got another $100 failure autismo.
>Amerifats
it's a swedish store with swedish meatballs and swedish product names
IKEA in general is impenetrable to actual Swedes.
?si=f_oSTQZ1QNO8m_dj&t=1410
america derangement syndrome
I bought a tv from ikea.
Piece of shitt never worked.
At least it was light and easy to bright upstairs.
i raped a girl in an Ikea bathroom during the moderate summer of '94. years later i found out she actually had my kid.
KWAB
I'll never understand the spergy autism over this one. It was blatant. And if you wouldn't have guessed it, you don't know anything about IKEA. And if you think that's not fair, it's a quiz show. That's how it is. And for the non-Americans who b***h about it, this version of the show is for Americans, so why should a foreigner be upset when they don't get something a regular American either would know, or one with trivia knowledge would know? Suck it up. I probably wouldn't know jack shit about TESCO or whatever store your people go to, but it being on a quiz show in your own country wouldn't upset me.
It's one of those early questions where usually the answer can be logically deduced from the question so you don't actually have to know anything about the topic, and there is one ridiculous answer that is different from all the others that cancels itself out.
This one has everything flipped, where the question is an insane mess of buzzwords talking about nothing, and the correct answer is the crazy one that is unlike the rest, so you do have to know about the topic to figure it out.
>so you do have to know about the topic to figure it out.
Nope. See
Nope.
>3. I know Ikea is known for their meatballs
That's knowing about the topic.
If you don't know that then the Ikea answer remains insane. Why would anyone take a "trip" to a furniture store to eat meatballs? That makes no sense.
Probably because you’re not from the United States and therefore the U.S. version of the show isn’t directed at you. Any other questions?
>Any other questions?
Just one.
Mmhmm. Frick off, foreigner.
Frick off back to Ikea for another meatball you fat Buzzfeed reading gay.
You definitely pretend to be American on Cinemaphile. Eat shit.
>Eat shit
That would require pretending to be American in real life
>surges of water flow
I can accept him fricking that up more than the IKEA guy.
>he doesn't know
kek what.
I miss trolling like this. Nowadays it's just
>Durrr troony!
Ah yes, I hate when you are walking in the forest and get inked by an owl
>implying you'd know hoo hit you
>tfw ywn get INKED by Paris Hilton
Gay
Go plug your phone in homosexual
>Early phase joke questions
>How many thousands are there in a million? A: One B: Ten C: Hundred D: Thousand
Spent her fifty-fifty on it while her friend was cringing to death in the audience
>"Math totally isn't one of my strong suits"
to be fair she had to try it in some weird fake language
>barko
>dingup
>zxhirtp
>kymmenenen
>kymmenenen
I think that's a "monster of the week" from one of the earlier Sailor Moon episodes.
i would have gotten this wrong
Who Wants to be Richer than a Fifth Grader
What comes after one hundred thousand, anon
one hundred thousand and one
two hundred thousand
this would be hard for me as i don't speak this language
For me it's Tuhat.
>Darmok and Jalad at Tanagra?
Name of the friend? She cute.
What is Aerosmith Lyrics?
HITLER DOOD WAT NAO
>lifeless black eyes, like a doll's eyes
a troop of well-wishers?
A CREEP IN BULL-BASHERS
I CRAMP AT BALL-BASHERS
a group of pill-pushers
His answer was actually funny though, even if a home run swing on a 3 ball count.
A group of pill pushers?
ball washers
She was 16 btw. Probably why she’s so cute.
>Thailand is known for what?
Girlwiener
BANGbreasts, STEVE
meet and—HUH?!
I miss Mika Tan
bump
If you can’t afford an ikea kitchen I’d be seriously worried.
TBF that shit is over priced for what it is. I’d rather get something lightly used off FB marketplace or Craigslist that’s 10x the quality for 1/10 the price.
Oh I agree with you . The stuff is cheap shit, which was my point
It's the fixtures that get you. Häfele are absolute bandits. 40 quid for an LED strip and driver? Häfeling a fricking laugh more like
Can I...... have....... a............. U
There's two U's.....would you like to spin again or solve the puzzle.
Right.
Anus shitstain
Minus situation
PENIS SITUATION
>Name a Man’s name that starts with the letter K
>Kentucky Fried Chicken
?feature=shared
dey bof got watahmelon
KFC, watermelon.
>name a city known for it's museums
England
blacks in a meme is cheating.
>>name a city known for it's museums
>England
Why are they so frickin stupid?
>doesn’t even know what hangman is
?feature=shared
How old are you? Also what's the answer.
T.32
This guy is me, I would've guessed Hollywood Squares because that's the only one I've never heard of. When I think of Hangman I think of drawing the noose, and when I think of Wheel of Fortune I think of spinning the wheel. You'd need to give me a few minutes to realize the letter guessing mechanisms are similar...
>name a part of the body that gets bigger as adults get older
?t=41
survey saaaaaaayyyyyssss
?feature=shared
gun slash occupant was one answer? wtf else is there? a dog
>but we won't cook and clean
>you stupid b***hes
he said get ready to steal and then they did. I wonder what her stupid answer was
>don’t know how to spell mosquitos
?t=19
why did they do it bros
>can you use it in a sentence
Do they have a fruit called fregh in India?
Also is Shunshi better than sushi?
>Wins the trip to London
>Hits on the 1 Million
>Solves the puzzle to completion
>Still lost
>we can't accept that
racism
I’m still mad that Regis screwed Norm out of the million.
%3D
only man in history to call them on their shit about 50/50
Preelection Retool?
Retaliation Retail??
what's that hoes IG. she looks like my cousin who is a puerto rican.
I want to frick Kushi's pushi
Long time no see
She looks the way non-leftists make black women look in video games.
Freeh tropical fruit?
She actually guessed FREGH
is she a black or some kinda Poo ??
Why does she look like a white chick fell into brown paint?
She's Indian
actual hot indian. rare and b***hiest of pokemon
There's no way that they can be worse than hot Vietnamese-American girls.
The pussy purple
My life's biggest regret was missing the auditions for this show in Bongland by a couple of weeks. My one goal in life is to be on Wheel of Fortune.
You wouldn't have made it, if it's any consolation. My cousins tried out for it once and it's kind of indescribable, the kind of person that they pick. Like they don't feel like real people.
I'm gonna be sad when these two go
Sajak is a megaChud so he can't go soon enough.
I'd like to see her Kushi
I made the mistake of googling her. I have no idea how they made her look so attractive on the show.
Every single time we have this thread without fail, you have so many "hurrr durrr, how should I know what buzzfeed said?" posts. That is NOT the part that matters. Get it through your thick fricking skulls.
> how would you feel if you hadn't had fresh tropical fruit this morning?
> but i did have fresh tropical fruit this morning. why are you saying i didn't?
everyone itt:
You should be able to solve this
The metropolitan museum of arf
Duh it's the world's most famous dog museum
French?
I wish I had a cute pajeeta gf
What was his endgame?
Wheel of Fortune > Jeopardy
i dont get it
He spun the wheel to almost exactly the same spot three times in a row.
The letters he called out, pay attention to them.
'ing' are very smart letters to start with
>Lose a turn
Damn it.
I'd love to tap Khushi's tushi, if you know what I mean?
NEKKID GRANDMAW
>NEKKID GRANDMAW PENIS STEVE
This is the kind of brown girl that will look like a goblin with her hair up. The stylist did all the heavy lifting framing her face and hiding her skull shape to make her presentable.
There was an episode of Jeopardy! once when a contestant was a technical manual writer for NASA.
She won several games in a row.
In one of her games one of the categories was "Aerospace Slang".
She did not get to ring in a single time on the category. Prick next to her kept beating her to it.