What he wanted was a glorified toy commercial to help pay off his divorce, and midwits continue to eat his shit up because >”You're either with me or against me!” Y'know just like Bush said!
EVERYONE was taking shots at Bush and Post-9/11 America. I doubt Lucas could give any original thought when it comes to ancient Greek stories or anything about post 9/11 politics. He just makes really surface level references to it and morons lap it up because they're as unread and unintelligent as he is.
he did
also kurtz parted ways before/during jedi because he wanted a darker ending and lucas veto'd him on it
kurtz was an idiot anyway, if he had full control his star wars would be more akin to what we have now.
>if he had full control his star wars would be more akin to what we have now
In what regard?
5 months ago
Anonymous
>In what regard?
for starters, kurtz is a suit. that should tell you everything you need to know. but since the first film was a success it ran to kurtz's head and he became insistent on being more controlling since he convinced himself that he was a key reason the movie did so well. that's one of the few reasons empire had its significantly darker tone and that effect carried over into jedi. but as i said before, kurtz wanted a darker ending for return of the jedi since at that time a sequel trilogy and a sequel sequel trilogy were planned, and kasdan was also in on it, but lucas was more concerned with presenting the story as he wanted to in the first place, which was a fairy tale with lasers.
not only is he an npc but he's likely a boomer and a manchild that was salty about the movies being for kids
the "prequels are an extended toy commercial" take is an old one and is often made by people who grew up with star wars toys
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMYp8pek0zk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFcs9hIn_Qs
https://youtu.be/g81PoGKO0qA
Keep in mind, all of this is PRE-PLINKETT.
George won. He's not crying. I bet he actually feels vindicated watching Disney fail with the series after all of the shit he got for the prequels. Star Wars fans are autistic manchildren who will never be satisfied. I bet George is happy to be away from it now
i ain't watching any of those but naturally they're all wrong and some of them have reneged their views since the sequels came out
5 months ago
Anonymous
that wasn't him, that was me. i'm also
prequels were never bad to begin with though, just misunderstood. that's why people reneged their views, they realized what morons they were back then.
>muh politics
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it >muh cgi
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it >muh shit characters
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it
need i go further?
and you're also moronic and a Black person and probably gay too.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>you're also . . . a Black person and probably gay too
OF COURSE a prequel fan would also be a /misc/lack! Ironic, since George himself is a Hollywood Leftist.
prequels were never bad to begin with though, just misunderstood. that's why people reneged their views, they realized what morons they were back then.
>muh politics
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it >muh cgi
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it >muh shit characters
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it
>prequels were never bad to begin with though, just misunderstood
No, the prequels were bad for misunderstanding the language of cinema. Just because they have interesting ideas, doesn't automatically make them worth a damn if the acting, dialogue and visuals are ass. >>muh politics >sequels only doubled down on it
Star Wars has always been political as war itself is the continuation of politics in a different form. What they hated was the story being centered around trade disputes, just as Jurassic Park fans hated Dominion for being about bugs. And for the zillionth time, having female and non-white leads is NOT POLITICAL. >>muh cgi >sequels only doubled down on it
Uh, no. A lot of the shooting was in real sets and locations, and they still made heavy use of actual puppets and costumes. >>muh shit characters >sequels only doubled down on it
NONE of the sequels characters reached the "heights" of Jar Jar or Mannequin Skywalker.
5 months ago
Anonymous
bad bait but i'll reply anyway >No, the prequels were bad for misunderstanding the language of cinema
pretentious term that has no meaning and a nonce complaint >Star Wars has always been political as war itself is the continuation of politics in a different form. What they hated was the story being centered around trade disputes, just as Jurassic Park fans hated Dominion for being about bugs. And for the zillionth time, having female and non-white leads is NOT POLITICAL.
star wars has been political since the first film, both within the universe and george throwing takes at the audience. and true, having a female or minority lead would not be political if kennedy wasn't clearly politically motivated in doing so >Uh, no. A lot of the shooting was in real sets and locations, and they still made heavy use of actual puppets and costumes.
the sequels did do a fair bit of location filming and costumes but there were no puppets used lmao they didn't even use miniatures like the ot and pt did. there was so much cgi used they literally used a blue screen in the midday while filming so they could get more sunlight in. why else do you think the budgets of these films cost twice what the prequels did? it wasn't just for reshoots. >NONE of the sequels characters reached the "heights" of Jar Jar or Mannequin Skywalker.
rose tico is jar-jar with a vegana.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>pretentious term that has no meaning and a nonce complaint
Prequel fan doesn't care about the current state of Hollywood blockbusters being cg diarrhea with lousy scripts. No surprise there. >having a female or minority lead would not be political if kennedy wasn't clearly politically motivated in doing so
That was George's idea actually. >b-but whaman with brown hair!
I'm struggling to think of a female lead in any Star War that is not: >brunette hair >some kind of leadership role or not afraid to take charge of a situation if others aren't >smaller build >more sass than books >exasperated sarcastic quips when things go badly >kinda autistic vibes >poor taste in men
Even Bastilla from KOTOR fits the bill. >there were no puppets used lmao
Babu Frick, Klaud, several Porgs, half of Maz's patrons, even Canto Bite had a couple. >rose tico is jar-jar with a vegana
Rose can be fixed with some tweaking here and there. The only way to fix Jar Jar is to completely dismantle and rebuild him from the ground up.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>something about scripts and cgi
thank you for proving "language of cinema" is a pretentious hack term made by redditors like you >muh brown haired woman
nice that you went on a rant that nobody else brought up. i know george's idea was to have a female lead, but because the films were produced under kennedy and she went ape with THE FORCE IS FEMALE it was inherently politicized >puppets
literally all of those were cgi you moron >rose
rose is the one in need of a serious do-over. frankly if you tone down jar jar's comedy bit he's a better character, most phantom menace edits do this and it works out better. every scene rose is in is cringe because all her dialogue is cringe and she contributes nothing significant whatsoever. jar jar at least has plot relevance.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>literally all of those were cgi
Also, "The Force is Female" was a NIKE campaign. It had NOTHING to do with Star Wars. Look, here's the article:
https://damchic.orangemedianetwork.com/1207/uncategorized/the-force-is-female-nikes-newest-campaign/ >jar jar at least has plot relevance.
That's the worst part.
5 months ago
Anonymous
>Also, "The Force is Female" was a NIKE campaign. It had NOTHING to do with Star Wars.
sure it may have started as a campaign for shoes but picrel still invalidates your pathetic attempt at an argument. do you seriously think they're promoting shoes in this picture? fricking idiot.
5 months ago
Anonymous
Are the Whills female? Aren't they just unicellular lifeforms?
5 months ago
Anonymous
if you ask someone at the company now they'd likely tell you yes.
5 months ago
Anonymous
I thought they were an ancient order that chronicled galactic history. That's what I heard from at least one interview with George.
5 months ago
Anonymous
You got it wrong.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MawInstallation/comments/13ex38a/everything_george_lucas_has_ever_said_about_the/
read this, it's everything collected in one place
5 months ago
Anonymous
>actively linking to reddit
kys
5 months ago
Anonymous
>t. memebrain
5 months ago
Anonymous
>KK wore one of their shirts, so it MUST be about Star Wars!
it's true anon, both shows made people re-evaluate the prequels. also anakin was a knight when he took on ahsoka as his padawan, the cgi show doesn't cover the entire conflict like the 2d series does, it starts six months into the war and at that point anakin was recently knighted.
This picture is moronic and this idea is moronic. It's a well-established phenomenon that people who long for something new and refreshing, like a job or relationship, will grow more fond of their old thing once they realize how good they actually had it. Y'know that saying "The grass isn't always greener" ?
The same applies to consumable media. You can play a sequel to a game or movie, find out it sucks ass, and realize that the original wasn't actually all that bad after all.
George won. He's not crying. I bet he actually feels vindicated watching Disney fail with the series after all of the shit he got for the prequels. Star Wars fans are autistic manchildren who will never be satisfied. I bet George is happy to be away from it now
he's definitely happy to see disney fail since he knew it would be the case. he's not happy to have let it go but it was only a matter of time and he bailed while he still had a relatively good spotlight. also i find it funny that he was actually a producer on dilate of destiny but it never gets mentioned, like marketing him being involved might have actually helped the box office. supposedly he had no involvement with the story but i guarantee you he showed up in post to edit the film into a salvable mess.
he should have. look at the jobs they’ve done since then. absolute shit. bulldozing the entire ranch and erecting an In n Out Burger for them to manage would have been a better move.
The only hatred anyone could have at old Georgie boy at this point are RLM fanboys who INSIST Disney Wars is better.
He's a weird man who struck gold and sold it all so he can frick around on his ranch all day. The prequels were stupid and boring but at least they didn't pretend to be some social justice movement.
>at least they didn't pretend to be some social justice movement
Kek. If anyone thinks George wouldn't be injecting SW with “wokeness” they aren't very smart. George was just as woke as Disney, if not more so.
The Empire is literally Nazi Germany/Imperialist Britain/Expansive America in space and is defeated by a *diverse* rebel group. The Prequels were heavily influenced by controversies around the Iraq War and have a very overt anti-Conservative message. George even admitted that Palpatine was based on Richard Nixon.
Also, the hero monks who are obsessed with nature, shun possession, and talk endlessly about connecting to and sharing power with all living things vs the evil monks who are obsessed with militarism, gaining personal power and a belief that power gives them the right to subjugate the weak. Basically, throw a black cloak on Ayn Rand and you have a Sith Lord.
I swear if George Lucas made the prequels in the modern day it would be filled with orange traitor drumpf and his dark army of miga qanon traitors are the root of all evil in modern america shit.
Yet you act like Disney Wars is this huge political pandering bit of leftist sjw propaganda . . . just for having women and PoCs in more prominent roles?
>The Prequels were heavily influenced by controversies around the Iraq War
2/3 of the prequel trilogy came out before we even invaded iraq you imbecile
>Spielberg's mystery box protege stabs you in the back >Spielberg's koffee girl stabs you in the back >Iger stabs you in the back and laughs about it in his memoir no one read >Spielberg nepo-inserts his daughter's boy toy to play Han Solo instead of Ingruber who actually starred alongside Ford in Age of Adeline >And to top it all off, the Yes Man weasel wop you groomed for running LucasFilm stabbed you in the back and made his character the Luke Skywalker replacement
The Tragedy of George The Boomer: he was nice keep his employees job, too nice to keep his creative legacy.
>pissed off two generations of fans by making what he wants
>sold it to white slavers
>pocketed the money and retired
Yeah he’s pretty based tbh
This is true, he's not a victim, therefore there's NOTHING to apologize to him for.
What he wanted was a glorified toy commercial to help pay off his divorce, and midwits continue to eat his shit up because
>”You're either with me or against me!” Y'know just like Bush said!
EVERYONE was taking shots at Bush and Post-9/11 America. I doubt Lucas could give any original thought when it comes to ancient Greek stories or anything about post 9/11 politics. He just makes really surface level references to it and morons lap it up because they're as unread and unintelligent as he is.
he paid off the divorce back in the 80s you midwit
Then he should've just retired after RotJ to focus on being a family man while trusting Kurtz with the future of the franchise.
he did
also kurtz parted ways before/during jedi because he wanted a darker ending and lucas veto'd him on it
kurtz was an idiot anyway, if he had full control his star wars would be more akin to what we have now.
>if he had full control his star wars would be more akin to what we have now
In what regard?
>In what regard?
for starters, kurtz is a suit. that should tell you everything you need to know. but since the first film was a success it ran to kurtz's head and he became insistent on being more controlling since he convinced himself that he was a key reason the movie did so well. that's one of the few reasons empire had its significantly darker tone and that effect carried over into jedi. but as i said before, kurtz wanted a darker ending for return of the jedi since at that time a sequel trilogy and a sequel sequel trilogy were planned, and kasdan was also in on it, but lucas was more concerned with presenting the story as he wanted to in the first place, which was a fairy tale with lasers.
nigguh you're a npc fr
copyright is a thing innit
not only is he an npc but he's likely a boomer and a manchild that was salty about the movies being for kids
the "prequels are an extended toy commercial" take is an old one and is often made by people who grew up with star wars toys
>Yidsney
>White
spaceshit/starshit, get it right
reminder lucas sold star wars because of plinkett reviews
Kathleen Kennedy confirmed it
Source(s)?
https://www.chefelf.com/starwars/ep1.php
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SMYp8pek0zk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LFcs9hIn_Qs
https://youtu.be/g81PoGKO0qA
Keep in mind, all of this is PRE-PLINKETT.
i ain't watching any of those but naturally they're all wrong and some of them have reneged their views since the sequels came out
Never said that, meme homosexual
>Never said that
that wasn't him, that was me. i'm also
and you're also moronic and a Black person and probably gay too.
>you're also . . . a Black person and probably gay too
OF COURSE a prequel fan would also be a /misc/lack! Ironic, since George himself is a Hollywood Leftist.
prequels were never bad to begin with though, just misunderstood. that's why people reneged their views, they realized what morons they were back then.
>muh politics
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it
>muh cgi
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it
>muh shit characters
it was always there and sequels only doubled down on it
need i go further?
>prequels were never bad to begin with though, just misunderstood
No, the prequels were bad for misunderstanding the language of cinema. Just because they have interesting ideas, doesn't automatically make them worth a damn if the acting, dialogue and visuals are ass.
>>muh politics
>sequels only doubled down on it
Star Wars has always been political as war itself is the continuation of politics in a different form. What they hated was the story being centered around trade disputes, just as Jurassic Park fans hated Dominion for being about bugs. And for the zillionth time, having female and non-white leads is NOT POLITICAL.
>>muh cgi
>sequels only doubled down on it
Uh, no. A lot of the shooting was in real sets and locations, and they still made heavy use of actual puppets and costumes.
>>muh shit characters
>sequels only doubled down on it
NONE of the sequels characters reached the "heights" of Jar Jar or Mannequin Skywalker.
bad bait but i'll reply anyway
>No, the prequels were bad for misunderstanding the language of cinema
pretentious term that has no meaning and a nonce complaint
>Star Wars has always been political as war itself is the continuation of politics in a different form. What they hated was the story being centered around trade disputes, just as Jurassic Park fans hated Dominion for being about bugs. And for the zillionth time, having female and non-white leads is NOT POLITICAL.
star wars has been political since the first film, both within the universe and george throwing takes at the audience. and true, having a female or minority lead would not be political if kennedy wasn't clearly politically motivated in doing so
>Uh, no. A lot of the shooting was in real sets and locations, and they still made heavy use of actual puppets and costumes.
the sequels did do a fair bit of location filming and costumes but there were no puppets used lmao they didn't even use miniatures like the ot and pt did. there was so much cgi used they literally used a blue screen in the midday while filming so they could get more sunlight in. why else do you think the budgets of these films cost twice what the prequels did? it wasn't just for reshoots.
>NONE of the sequels characters reached the "heights" of Jar Jar or Mannequin Skywalker.
rose tico is jar-jar with a vegana.
>pretentious term that has no meaning and a nonce complaint
Prequel fan doesn't care about the current state of Hollywood blockbusters being cg diarrhea with lousy scripts. No surprise there.
>having a female or minority lead would not be political if kennedy wasn't clearly politically motivated in doing so
That was George's idea actually.
>b-but whaman with brown hair!
I'm struggling to think of a female lead in any Star War that is not:
>brunette hair
>some kind of leadership role or not afraid to take charge of a situation if others aren't
>smaller build
>more sass than books
>exasperated sarcastic quips when things go badly
>kinda autistic vibes
>poor taste in men
Even Bastilla from KOTOR fits the bill.
>there were no puppets used lmao
Babu Frick, Klaud, several Porgs, half of Maz's patrons, even Canto Bite had a couple.
>rose tico is jar-jar with a vegana
Rose can be fixed with some tweaking here and there. The only way to fix Jar Jar is to completely dismantle and rebuild him from the ground up.
>something about scripts and cgi
thank you for proving "language of cinema" is a pretentious hack term made by redditors like you
>muh brown haired woman
nice that you went on a rant that nobody else brought up. i know george's idea was to have a female lead, but because the films were produced under kennedy and she went ape with THE FORCE IS FEMALE it was inherently politicized
>puppets
literally all of those were cgi you moron
>rose
rose is the one in need of a serious do-over. frankly if you tone down jar jar's comedy bit he's a better character, most phantom menace edits do this and it works out better. every scene rose is in is cringe because all her dialogue is cringe and she contributes nothing significant whatsoever. jar jar at least has plot relevance.
>literally all of those were cgi
Also, "The Force is Female" was a NIKE campaign. It had NOTHING to do with Star Wars. Look, here's the article:
https://damchic.orangemedianetwork.com/1207/uncategorized/the-force-is-female-nikes-newest-campaign/
>jar jar at least has plot relevance.
That's the worst part.
>Also, "The Force is Female" was a NIKE campaign. It had NOTHING to do with Star Wars.
sure it may have started as a campaign for shoes but picrel still invalidates your pathetic attempt at an argument. do you seriously think they're promoting shoes in this picture? fricking idiot.
Are the Whills female? Aren't they just unicellular lifeforms?
if you ask someone at the company now they'd likely tell you yes.
I thought they were an ancient order that chronicled galactic history. That's what I heard from at least one interview with George.
You got it wrong.
https://www.reddit.com/r/MawInstallation/comments/13ex38a/everything_george_lucas_has_ever_said_about_the/
read this, it's everything collected in one place
>actively linking to reddit
kys
>t. memebrain
>KK wore one of their shirts, so it MUST be about Star Wars!
>his views and tastes cannot mature beyond jumping on hate trains
Both Clone Wars cartoons were responsible for the shift in how the Prequels were perceived, not the Sequel Trilogy shitting the bed alone.
BOTH Clone Wars cartoons?
it's true anon, both shows made people re-evaluate the prequels. also anakin was a knight when he took on ahsoka as his padawan, the cgi show doesn't cover the entire conflict like the 2d series does, it starts six months into the war and at that point anakin was recently knighted.
This picture is moronic and this idea is moronic. It's a well-established phenomenon that people who long for something new and refreshing, like a job or relationship, will grow more fond of their old thing once they realize how good they actually had it. Y'know that saying "The grass isn't always greener" ?
The same applies to consumable media. You can play a sequel to a game or movie, find out it sucks ass, and realize that the original wasn't actually all that bad after all.
>>I sord my capeshit franchise for birrions of dorrars! Oh, roe is me!
What did Lucas Kojima mean by this?
>Midichlorians are nanomachines, son.
He didn’t say that
He needs to buy it back and make an actual sequel trilogy
Good thing he already pre-wrote the outline
Noooooo daddy Lucas betrayed me, the EU was supposed to be canon!
Why? Ford wouldn't do it. Fisher is gone.
Hell, it was Ford who wanted Han to get axed.
Posted without comment
Star Wars is for Kids - Chad Lucas
George won. He's not crying. I bet he actually feels vindicated watching Disney fail with the series after all of the shit he got for the prequels. Star Wars fans are autistic manchildren who will never be satisfied. I bet George is happy to be away from it now
he's definitely happy to see disney fail since he knew it would be the case. he's not happy to have let it go but it was only a matter of time and he bailed while he still had a relatively good spotlight. also i find it funny that he was actually a producer on dilate of destiny but it never gets mentioned, like marketing him being involved might have actually helped the box office. supposedly he had no involvement with the story but i guarantee you he showed up in post to edit the film into a salvable mess.
george has moved on, you should too OP
Tell
that.
star wars is reddit now
>reddit
.
>troony movie with troony meme
Ok troony, here’s your selfie btw
Christ, all I did was point out how "reddit" and "troony" have been tossed around so much on here that they've lost all meaning by this point.
I'm OK with him leaving Star Wars.
But it's disappointing that he hasn't done anything since then.
He sold Lucasfilm to keep his employees working. If he just cashed out and folded the company as he retired he'd be leaving hundreds without jobs.
This. This is also a big part of why he decided to retire when he did. Lucasfilm was not thriving in 2010-2011.
he should have. look at the jobs they’ve done since then. absolute shit. bulldozing the entire ranch and erecting an In n Out Burger for them to manage would have been a better move.
When did he complain?
Is Lucas no longer interested in making movies?
hasn't been for 40 years
literally what does he do with all that money
Have to admit, it's amusing as hell that someone is so fundamentally stupid as to think Star Wars is "capeshit."
Seriously, kiddo, what was your first language? Clearly not English.
Or wait, is OP just a ChatBot?
>is OP just a ChatBot
I wish, then I wouldn't be so tired by the collective lukewarm intelligence of this board.
>makes star slop gays shit themselves and seethe about how he ruined their childhoods
>makes bank doing so
>does this multiple times
He's a based god.
>WHAT IF DARTH VADER USED TO BE A HUGE CRYBABY homosexual
wow so engaging thanks George.
rots zoomers all need to dilate
we were all huge crybaby homosexuals at some point anon, you're still one today. and quit pretending you're old, you're not even 25 yet.
stop pretending to be a woman.
prequels and those gay cartoons have always been shit and no garbage from disney changes this.
funny you calling me a woman when you're losing your mind over a children's series while i'm comfortably enjoying them.
>funny you calling me a woman when you're losing your mind over a children's series while i'm comfortably enjoying them.
The only hatred anyone could have at old Georgie boy at this point are RLM fanboys who INSIST Disney Wars is better.
He's a weird man who struck gold and sold it all so he can frick around on his ranch all day. The prequels were stupid and boring but at least they didn't pretend to be some social justice movement.
Captcha:THXg4
>at least they didn't pretend to be some social justice movement
Kek. If anyone thinks George wouldn't be injecting SW with “wokeness” they aren't very smart. George was just as woke as Disney, if not more so.
The Empire is literally Nazi Germany/Imperialist Britain/Expansive America in space and is defeated by a *diverse* rebel group. The Prequels were heavily influenced by controversies around the Iraq War and have a very overt anti-Conservative message. George even admitted that Palpatine was based on Richard Nixon.
Also, the hero monks who are obsessed with nature, shun possession, and talk endlessly about connecting to and sharing power with all living things vs the evil monks who are obsessed with militarism, gaining personal power and a belief that power gives them the right to subjugate the weak. Basically, throw a black cloak on Ayn Rand and you have a Sith Lord.
I swear if George Lucas made the prequels in the modern day it would be filled with orange traitor drumpf and his dark army of miga qanon traitors are the root of all evil in modern america shit.
Yet you act like Disney Wars is this huge political pandering bit of leftist sjw propaganda . . . just for having women and PoCs in more prominent roles?
>PoC
Nice bait, we call them "Black folk" here.
I think you're lost.
I think you're lost.
>The Prequels were heavily influenced by controversies around the Iraq War
2/3 of the prequel trilogy came out before we even invaded iraq you imbecile
He's a spiteful little c**t, I bet he spends every night regretting what he did just to own nerds that attacked him.
Is he the only person who ever sold out and gained respect?
>Spielberg's mystery box protege stabs you in the back
>Spielberg's koffee girl stabs you in the back
>Iger stabs you in the back and laughs about it in his memoir no one read
>Spielberg nepo-inserts his daughter's boy toy to play Han Solo instead of Ingruber who actually starred alongside Ford in Age of Adeline
>And to top it all off, the Yes Man weasel wop you groomed for running LucasFilm stabbed you in the back and made his character the Luke Skywalker replacement
The Tragedy of George The Boomer: he was nice keep his employees job, too nice to keep his creative legacy.