Is Teen Titans Go the only instance in recent time where the reboot was more successful than the original?
 Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
 Ape Out Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Is Teen Titans Go the only instance in recent time where the reboot was more successful than the original?
In general reboots aren’t as successful because they revive only the best-performing IPs for new content and have to compete against said original’s success, if they rebooted middling success shows or absolute failures you’d see more TTG or Horse Show successes
Lion King live action made far, far more then Lion King at the box office
Little Mermaid 2023 made more then Little Mermaid at the box office
>Lion King live action made far, far more then Lion King at the box office
>Little Mermaid 2023 made more then Little Mermaid at the box office
I think comparing moderns movie box office with the classic is always one important factor forgotten. No, not inflation, but that the market is simply bigger. Not only has the population increased, but also the amount of people being able to buy tickets and of course the globalization, which enables studios to sell their movie to far more cinemas around the world than before.
Money isn't worth now what it was back in the early 90's, Anon.
Yes, and? That's the point of inflation. The number is bigger, but it's not worth more. But inflation is always brought up in these discussions, but not the other points.
Outside of a count of butts in seats it's the best metric you can get.
The original post was implying that the remakes were more succesful(and possibly that they were better) than the originals. The original post wasn't making the points you are presumably referring to. I was replying to
not
The original Lion King and Little Mermaid were met with universal praise and remain legendary peices of animated cinema to this day. Live Action Lion King will be forgotten soon if it has not all ready and the Little Mermaid Live Action Remake has been panned and is the subject of much derision.
>I was replying to
odd, since you quoted my post and not the other anons post
you because one doesn't have exact numbers, doesn't mean the points should be ignored.
>odd, since you quoted my post and not the other anons pos
My bad, excuse my homosexualry.
It's okay, we all accidentally suck dick sometimes, I know I have
I'm pretty sure every top grossing list worth its salt is adjusted for inflation.
With inflation Lion King 91 made 2,161m Vs Lion King 19 at 1,663m
Probably the same with Little Mermiad
>Lion King live action made far, far more then Lion King at the box office
>Little Mermaid 2023 made more then Little Mermaid at the box office
Because companies started leveraging the international box office more and have basically no competition. Bluth was releasing movies the same day Disney released theirs to spite them.
>what's inflation?
Disney movies made more money in merchandise than they did in ticket sales and by now those moves have been selling merch for 30 years
Don't kid yourself they didn't make as much money as the originals
We want to Make Life action Lion King a Franchise in the Scope of Star Wars
Is Disney Serious?
The original Lion King's continuity already has two Direct to Video sequels that by a miracle are good by Dsney direct to video standards, an animated show and a succesfull Broadway show.
But that table implies TTGO aired before the original.
Can't find viewership numbers for the original series, but TTGO seems to had the same numbers as everything else airing at that time. Including right now with a pathetic 0.1M average, same as the Hailey trash.
So I guess we could argue that it doesn't do better than anything else currently airing, but it also doesn't do worse, however sine it has been running for a longer time than the original and lacking the numbers for that one, then, yes it's more successful?
>But that table implies TTGO aired before the original.
Whatever it takes to shit on the original show. Even lying.
Cope and seethe classicgay.
lmao you think reboots actually fail and are rightfully called out by audiences instead of being consumed by instinct?
i bet the fricking star wars sequels made back cash despite killing backlash and more than the originals or prequels, and don't make me start with the DCEU
Teen Titans Go! was targeted at a much younger demographic and cost way less to produce. It was the next Johnny Test, a show so cheap, fast and easy to make that they woul;d profit even if it only had modest views.
Guess that explains why Capcom keeps making Monster hunter and Resident evil titles even though everyone wants more Mega Man titles and micro soft penis keeps making gaylo titles even though everyone wants microsoft penis to die. They keep making the same games over and over again.
However, Johnny Test and Teen Titans Go are not fitting example because Johnny Test and Teen Titans Go are actually good unlike Resedent evil, Monster hunter and gaylo.
This depends on which metric you are using to define success. Rather than looking at financials, I'd rather consider reboots that have displaced the original in the pop culture zeitgeist.
MLP:FiM is the most obvious one. I mean, it has its own board.
Voltron Legendary Defender, love it or hate it, is probably what most people picture when they hear Voltron.
Super Mario Bros Movie is arguably a reboot, as there were two movies prior to it.
Its kinda weird how they just shit on the original, could have also jabbed how GO! aired 24/7 to the point of brain rot.
Because the original actually is shit.