Let's shit on each other once again.
Return of the Jedi is shit.
 It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
 Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Let's shit on each other once again. Return of the Jedi is shit.
Let's shit on each other once again.
Return of the Jedi is shit.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Came here to complain about Two Towers.
frick 'em, my right fellas? xD
Absolutely shit-tier taste, this must be a troll image. Go get turned to stone, b***h.
1 - full bar
2 - same as pictured
3 - same as 2
Jurassic park is like a perfect movie. completely discredited
absolutely
godfather 3 was a big fall off but it wasnt unwatchable dogshit.
Saved by cousin fricking.
Not a single sequel mentioned there is better than the original.
Terminator 2 > 1
Not even close.
Ok
Terminator 2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1
More like Terminator 2 = Terminator but shittier
T1 is alright, but it aged poorly.
T2 is eternal.
t2 aged like shit with the smartass kid and non diagetic soundtrack
This is an obvious troll, they aren’t even the same movie besides the most bare bones premise. Let me guess that you also think alien and aliens are the same exact movie too.
bump
Correct.
T1 > T2
Alien > Aliens
etc
The Godfather II >> The Godfather
The 2 Towers is a little better than The Fellowship.
In what world is thunderdome better than the first mad max?
>First mad max
>"Oi wanka, that bloody bloke is speeding the damn 'roos! I'm gonna go CUHHRAZEEE!"
>Thunderdome
>complex worldbuilding and lore, nothing way over the top. Redemption story.
Why would anyone consider the first mad max as anything but a big shitpost?
Because it was first, i guess?
Also Tina Turner is pretty believable as a psycho chimptress!
>Mad Max 3 that high
>all Jurassic Parks that low
Incredibly dumb opinions
mad max 3 was much better than first slop
in retrospect what was it even about?
Its not a story based movie.
Its just some cops vs some gangsters in the twilight of the world.
alien was significantly better than aliens, which was (fun) slop
Jurassic Park is indeed a perfect blockbuster
Fellowship is the best LOTR
If that is referring to the classic planet of the apes movies, 3 should be way above 2.
Spider-Man 3 really wasn't that bad.
Where's the kino?
The Human Condition trilogy
Three Colours trilogy
Before trilogy
Tetsuo trilogy
Vengeance trilogy
Dollars trilogy
> Where's the le homosexualry?
in the trash where it deserves to be
I promise you those trilogies wipe the floor with the slop op posted. Learn media literacy
>Dollars trilogy
This would count as one of the very few examples of the successive films getting better, no? Though guess it's a bit of a cheat as it's anthology.
I haven't seen Bullet Man, but Tetsuo: Body Hammer was basically unwatchable.
>asks for Kino
>lists cinema and film
>star wars that high
manchild thread, stopped reading
Is there a hidden rules stipulating the third one is always the worst (exception being LOTR) ?
Even true for Kitano's Outrage thinking of it, which I'll rate as Blade on OP's graphics.
Writers who don’t plan for an ending always fated to end it in shitty ways
I think it’s just that at that point oftentimes the filmmakers are just out of ideas and don’t have the same creative spark that led to the first film become a hit in the first place. Notice how many third entries in famous trilogies are essentially a remake of the first movie in a lot of ways
This is so fricking stupid.
>Jurassic Park being that low
>Die Hard 2 better than 3
Die Hard 3 is a great film untill they find out Simon's riddles are bullshit. After that it turns into a pile of shit. And the ending is anti-climactic as frick. At least Die Hard 2 is consistent the whole way through.
>star wars
first one slightly lower, third one same
>indiana jones
second one is lower than third and first
>jurassic park
first one should be a full bar
>spiderman
first one should be higher, second full bar, third half way
>LOTR
first one full bar, and then very gradually descending into the second and third
>mad max
there is no way thunderdome is better than the first that is just moronic
>alien
3 really isnt that bad honestly
>there is no way thunderdome is better than the first that is just moronic
Most people don't know Mad Max from the first movie. It's not surprising that their opinion is stupid.
can we admit that shitting on matrix 2 and 3 is just to sound cool at this point, of course the first is better, but they're not bad
I agree. Same with Spiderman 3. Way too overhated.
I’ll agree with you on matrix reloaded but the dance shit and a bunch of the goofy shit in 3 really hurt the movie also the blatant Jesus stuff was too on the nose
>Blade 2 is better than Blade
what the frick are you smoking freedrick?
Exactly. Frick Gordo Del Taco.
Is it bad that I've never seen any of these complete trilogies? I mean I think I've seen one of the old jurrassic park movies. I remember the raptors but I couldn't tell you a single plot point. I fell asleep during godfather so I never finished it. I think I've seen all of star wars via osmosis. Hell, I didn't even know there were 3 superman movies unless we are counting justice league.
Yes and you should feel bad as well
no Bourne
first one is sorta watchable, the rest are capeshit slop disguised as muh grim cloak and dagger
you are not totally wrong.
Whatever: it's a trilogy.
it has to be rated as such.
No Arcane
This chart is shit.
>Beyond Thunderdome better than Mad Max
>LotRs rated worse overall than the original Matrix and Die Hard
>Aliens over Alien
>Jurassic Park not topped out and rated lower than fricking any science fiction film on this list
Redd*t is responsible for this, I'm fricking certain.
Thunderdome better than Mad Max
You serious? That was too Hollywood.
homosexual opinions. The original Mad Max is a grindhouse classic with one of the best revenge climaxes in the genre. The movie's end is flawless and only morons could argue otherwise. Thunderdome is okay, but it's a bad Mad Max film and tonally dissonant with the franchise - especially after the brutality of the first two films.
cool
the first mad max is ass
>mogs all of them
White is the only good one. Blue is pretty mid and Red is nauseatingly bad.
>LotR movies lower rated than star wars
How was Dark Knight that bad?
Godfather III and Alien 3 are kino. gtfo
Fellowship is the only cozy LOTR. I usually watch it without the sequels.
Last Crusade is the best Indiana Jones movie.
>Raiders is 8/10
>Temple is 6/10
>Crusade is 9/10
>Crystal Skull is 4/10
>Won't watch the new one, thanks.
lotr 1 is so much better than 2 and 3
>batman returns that low
Yet still mogs ever other movie after it.
Blade 3 is kino. It embraced the early 2000s cringe in a way that is endearing and entertaining.
Terminator 3 and Aliens 3 are nowhere near as bad as that image implies, either.
Unironically praising a movie with a 3 minute ad for iPod in the middle of it
wow
are you actually serious with this shit?
great bait, goddamn
I've never much liked Die Hard 2. I thought 3 was miles better.
>The Last Crusade being equal to the far inferior Temple of Doom
>Jurassic Park not being at the high top
>Back to the Future Pt. II not being higher than Pt. III
>Rambo: First Blood Part II and III not being at the bottom
>Aliens being higher than Alien
>LOTR stay being the retention king
LOTR chads, we stay eating good eternally. Every LOTR movie is just as good as the last. Contrarians need not reply.
Incorrect. The first film was truly great, the second and third were good but just a porridge of CGI.
Blade 2 is nowhere near as good as the first and I'm tired of people pretending like it is.
This graph is fricking moronic, some of these are not even trilogies, let alone being the actual concept of a trilogy.