Veganism is an ideology and contradictory.
Dietary concerns such as lactose intolerance have a real answer.
One vegan will tell you it's okay, because of consent. Another will tell you it's not, because it's just like milking a cow and they don't want to "normalise" it for their baby. Another will shrug her shoulders and just use grain milk until the baby starves and dies.
And then a bystander vegan will say you cannot ask for consent from the mother, for it is not her choice, it is the baby's choice to bed fed, and some days she will not want to breast feed but will still do so because she has to... and will pressure the mother into accepting this point of view... which works on the same logic of "I didn't consent to working for money to pay for food, someone else should just give me free food, a free Xbox, free weed and free anything else I want."
>give real examples of vegans disagreeing on a real topic and how they hurt babies and mothers in the process >"bro, vegans don't agree on everything"
Vegans have low energy levels, leading to a lack of reading comprehension. Are you a vegan?
>"Vegans disagree on [topic]" >anon, vegans don't agree on every topic >"That's what I said" >how does this disprove anything I said?!?!?!
Yea, same for cum. If it's given willingly the vegan may partake.
[...]
Wow its almost like veganism is a philosophy where people thinking for themselves come to different conclusions, instead of a religion where they're all told the same thing.
t. Vegan
>veganism is a philosophy where people think for themselves >instead of a religion where they're all told the same thing. >t. Vegan
>makes it up >uhhhhhh this is a real example
No vegan on earth would refuse their own breastmilk for their baby unless they also insane, in which case you're blaming vegans for the antics of insane people. Even then they could still use one of the dozens of FDA-approved vegan baby formulas available on Amazon for $12
>no true scotsman
These responses feel like something you get after insulting someone's favorite FOTM game or anime... or if you said pedophilia is wrong.
Vegans sure do have lowered IQs from poor vit B intake.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
>jokes on you, I never had a point to begin with
Another fruitful discussion on Cinemaphile
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
You said veganism was contradictory because some vegans disagree on some things. I said that people disagree on things and that the whole movement isn't contradictory just because of it. According to that logic most political ideologies are contradictory.
3 weeks ago
Anonymous
Also, it's funny how you didnt even try to defend the "real examples" claim
>makes it up >uhhhhhh this is a real example
No vegan on earth would refuse their own breastmilk for their baby unless they also insane, in which case you're blaming vegans for the antics of insane people. Even then they could still use one of the dozens of FDA-approved vegan baby formulas available on Amazon for $12
Yea, same for cum. If it's given willingly the vegan may partake.
Veganism is an ideology and contradictory.
Dietary concerns such as lactose intolerance have a real answer.
One vegan will tell you it's okay, because of consent. Another will tell you it's not, because it's just like milking a cow and they don't want to "normalise" it for their baby. Another will shrug her shoulders and just use grain milk until the baby starves and dies.
And then a bystander vegan will say you cannot ask for consent from the mother, for it is not her choice, it is the baby's choice to bed fed, and some days she will not want to breast feed but will still do so because she has to... and will pressure the mother into accepting this point of view... which works on the same logic of "I didn't consent to working for money to pay for food, someone else should just give me free food, a free Xbox, free weed and free anything else I want."
Wow its almost like veganism is a philosophy where people thinking for themselves come to different conclusions, instead of a religion where they're all told the same thing.
t. Vegan
Only the 2nd and last one actually. You inference something is wrong by her crying and also notice her large breasts. Then the last panel shows he's dead in a casket, the shirt implies he died due to her breasts, leaving the how to the viewer.
This is almost a good joke. The pieces are there, but need to be consolidated. It doubles down on explaining the joke and ends with a weaker punchline than if it just stopped at the 2nd panel. This artist should trust his audience more. Or maybe they know exactly the intelligence level of their audience and this actually is necessary. Not that that’s better, but I understand the temptation to pander.
You could remove the two bottom panels and the joke is the same. You could even reverse both panels and it would still work. Why do redditors think that adding more and more jokes and references makes a joke funnier?
I've often wondered if breast milk is ok for vegans. Since technically you can get it with consent.
A baby has no idea or understands the concept of consent.
>you need expressed verbal consent before you can feed your baby
homie the frick is wrong with you
Ok, you belong in jail.
Veganism is an ideology and contradictory.
Dietary concerns such as lactose intolerance have a real answer.
One vegan will tell you it's okay, because of consent. Another will tell you it's not, because it's just like milking a cow and they don't want to "normalise" it for their baby. Another will shrug her shoulders and just use grain milk until the baby starves and dies.
And then a bystander vegan will say you cannot ask for consent from the mother, for it is not her choice, it is the baby's choice to bed fed, and some days she will not want to breast feed but will still do so because she has to... and will pressure the mother into accepting this point of view... which works on the same logic of "I didn't consent to working for money to pay for food, someone else should just give me free food, a free Xbox, free weed and free anything else I want."
Have you thought that maybe different people have different views on things? Why do you expect every single vegan to completely agree on everything?
>give real examples of vegans disagreeing on a real topic and how they hurt babies and mothers in the process
>"bro, vegans don't agree on everything"
Vegans have low energy levels, leading to a lack of reading comprehension. Are you a vegan?
>give real examples of vegans disagreeing on a real topic
What real examples did you give? Also how does this disprove anything I said?
>"Vegans disagree on [topic]"
>anon, vegans don't agree on every topic
>"That's what I said"
>how does this disprove anything I said?!?!?!
>veganism is a philosophy where people think for themselves
>instead of a religion where they're all told the same thing.
>t. Vegan
>no true scotsman
These responses feel like something you get after insulting someone's favorite FOTM game or anime... or if you said pedophilia is wrong.
Vegans sure do have lowered IQs from poor vit B intake.
>jokes on you, I never had a point to begin with
Another fruitful discussion on Cinemaphile
You said veganism was contradictory because some vegans disagree on some things. I said that people disagree on things and that the whole movement isn't contradictory just because of it. According to that logic most political ideologies are contradictory.
Also, it's funny how you didnt even try to defend the "real examples" claim
>makes it up
>uhhhhhh this is a real example
No vegan on earth would refuse their own breastmilk for their baby unless they also insane, in which case you're blaming vegans for the antics of insane people. Even then they could still use one of the dozens of FDA-approved vegan baby formulas available on Amazon for $12
>unless they also insane
Isn't that a prerequisite for being vegan? What sane person would willingly ruin their own longevity just to own the chuds?
>Have you thought that maybe different people have different views on things?
Yes this leads to many problems
Yea, same for cum. If it's given willingly the vegan may partake.
Wow its almost like veganism is a philosophy where people thinking for themselves come to different conclusions, instead of a religion where they're all told the same thing.
t. Vegan
It needs either just the first and second one or the first and last one
Only the 2nd and last one actually. You inference something is wrong by her crying and also notice her large breasts. Then the last panel shows he's dead in a casket, the shirt implies he died due to her breasts, leaving the how to the viewer.
But then you miss out on getting an eyeful of breasts
Zoomer """humor""" is the fricking worst
>he said, posting an example of zoomer humor
Well, round 2 today I guess.
There just something about poorly drawn breasts that turn me on
This is almost a good joke. The pieces are there, but need to be consolidated. It doubles down on explaining the joke and ends with a weaker punchline than if it just stopped at the 2nd panel. This artist should trust his audience more. Or maybe they know exactly the intelligence level of their audience and this actually is necessary. Not that that’s better, but I understand the temptation to pander.
the dead guy's hands make it look like the angry guy in the last panel has a skeleton mouth
It's not often you see the punchline three times in a four panel comic.
Needs more panels explaining the joke.
You could remove the two bottom panels and the joke is the same. You could even reverse both panels and it would still work. Why do redditors think that adding more and more jokes and references makes a joke funnier?