ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
lemme guess: restore the snyder verse? sell it to disney? shrieking about wokeness? whining that there's too much batman?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Not a bad thing. My problem is if you're going to put all this effort in, and you already nuked batgirl. Why not just reboot the whole thing with new actors and a new trilogy of movies?
Hell. Why not just let reeves do his Batman trilogy and then use that as the jumping off pad for a new DC universe?
shut the frick up about Batgirl already you moron
Nobody gives a frick about batgirl, do you really think an imminent flop movies calls for a full reboot of all their franchises lmao
90% of the whole DC movie universe was an imminent flop that called for a full reboot. It's that 10% that actually made money (Shazam, Aquman, Wonder Woman, Black Adam) that's keeping them from just saying 'frick it' and pressing the reboot button with a new cast and 'frick you zack snyder with your killer superman' tone.
It's because 90% of DC movies aren't flops like you morons insist. So now you're surprised that this supposedly flopping universe isn't being killed off. Maybe stop living your life on hyperbole mode 24/7 and shit will make sense.
The first ever live action Justice League movie in human history wasn't the biggest Superhero movie bomb in the history of film?
Are you illiterate or did your worthless dad beat your head with a bat as a baby?
Reeves doesn't want his movies connected. He wants to keep them very grounded and gritty for some stupid reason.
Yeah idk why Reeves wants to make movies that people actually like and make money at the box office. What a mad man.
What purpose would Batman existing in some big, dumb goofy ass universe serve? Shared universes do nothing but stifle story telling. If Matt Reeves wants Superman to show up to Gotham, I don't know why it has to be same Superman as Henry Cavill. I've never seen a good argument for why we need a shared universe. We just do because.... we just do, okay????
>for some stupid reason
He wants to make Batman movies where Batman and Gotham are actual, living breathing characters and not just set dressing for a generic NYC action thriller or a big dumb alien apocalypse fight. He actually loves Batman unlike you.
>. He actually loves Batman unlike you.
Then why did he make gotham a generic NYC? If thats loving Batman, I'd rather have a Tim Burton type who doesn't care about Batman but makes an amazing, otherworldly city.
I see you're confused. He's talking about Matt Reeves, not Christopher Nolan. Christopher Nolan is an Br*t so he had no chance of ever truly appreciating Batman so that's why his Gotham is literally just NYC helicopter shots.
Tim Burton's Gotham was great and literally the only memorable part of his movies. Sadly the rest of his movies, like the writing and acting, fricking sucked.
>literally the only memorable part
You can say you didn't like them, but they weren't the only memorable thing.
They both looked like a generic city. Begins at least had the narrows, which was dull, but at least something.
The Batman Gotham is a perfect depiction of a modern Gotham. You're just a man child that has the same moronic boomer brain was AVGN. If you like Tim Burton that's your own problem, he'll be dead soon so go suck him off before that happens.
That just looks like NYC
Yeah Gotham looks like NYC because it was based on NYC. I'm always glad to help out new Batman fans with the history of the series.
its chicago you false fan
It's actually probably Jersey City.
Burton's Batman literally transformed Batman into DC's biggest property that it is today.
Okay. Now Tim Burton is 90 years old and about to die. Move on and learn to enjoy new things, you autist.
He doesn't give a shit about Batman. He just like Nolan's Batman or like the Batman from Year One and is just copying those. Batman as 80+ years of other stories that Reeves has no interest in. He's trying to tell gritty and grounded stories but at the end of the day it is still a man running around in a silly Batman costume.
>He doesn't give a shit about Batman
The Batman is still the only Batman movie I've seen where Batman is an actual character having to come to terms with what it means to be a hero.
Yeah he fricking hates Batman bro.
It was just a shitty TDK ripoff. Just wait until he introduces the Joker with scars on his face again just like in TDK.
The Batman was actually so impressive that I have a feeling that's clearly not the Joker, Matt Reeves strikes me as the type of Batman fan that hates Joker wank. If it was just a shitty Hack Snyder movie then yeah no doubt it's the joker, that's the go-to hack move.
>Matt Reeves strikes me as the type of Batman fan that hates Joker wank
Sounds like you didn’t watch the scene with Joker and Riddler at Arkham bear the end of the movie.
Yes, my point is that that's not Joker. It could be Hush or Clayface. It's called a bait and switch, dumb dumb. Matt Reeves knows Joker is popular and wants to frick with normies who want more Joker.
>Yes, my point is that [headcanon]
It’s gonna be the fricking Joker all over again bro
Yeah he loves Batman which is why he’ll completely change characters or outright not use them just to fight his shitty aesthetic.
>completely change characteristics
From what? Batman doesn't have established characteristics. Fricking dumbass. You can't even elaborate on your point because it would make no sense. Every version of Batman, Gotham, and the characters are different. That's how writing works. Lmao.
Let him finish the trilogy and then bribe pattinson with a bag of cash to cameo at the end of the Superman reboot.
I enjoy Matt Reeves, but he's really clinging hard to that edgy 90's edgelord visual aesthetic for the baddies. A good compromise would be let the Reeves Batman rogues gallery exist in the edgy 90's-verse, and just insert Battinson as needed like a side dish or seasoning. It would be goofy to exclude a main character, but these are strange times.
Reeves Batman is way less succesful than Nolan's
It's also a better batman movie than nolan's
>ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
No. It will be funnier to watch your meltdown as the movies come out.
I just hope James Gunn is smart enough to see that every character needs to have movies with their own personality, not just DCEU/MCU-style standardization and cohesion across the board. The Batman feels like an actual standalone Batman movie, not a movie about Batman in some bigger universe. Thor movies are no longer Thor movies, they are MCU movies with Thor in it.
>Thor movies are no longer Thor movies, they are MCU movies with Thor in it
That has been Thor comics for decades anon.
Don't recall asking. I don't care about capeshit comics. And what I said applies to any MCU character, FYI
GotG 1/2 were meh, and so was his Suicide Squad. No reason to be hyped for anything they make for at least a few years, until they can prove that they can make a movie actually worth watching.
Disney and the MCU are shit, so don't put that on me.
He's not directing and writing all the movies, dumb dumbs. He's basically just going to be Kevin Fiege with no power.
>NONONONO, ACHSHULLY HE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT DESPITE MY OP POST AND EVERYTHING ELSE SAYING TO THE CONTRARY
kek
good ol DCEU shills.
He's just the lore consistency guy. He's not making the movies. Idk why you're mad at me for correcting you.
>Idk why you're mad at me for correcting you.
I'm not mad at anybody, but I know autists have trouble with that sort of thing; I'm laughing at the shit you're pulling out of your ass to defend this shit-show called the DCEU.
>uhh, Gunn's gonna have nothing to do with it; he'll be a powerless Feige
How do you even know this? Feige was supposedly "powerless," and yet we still ended up with flatties instead of hotties because of him.
James Gunn isn't making the movies. Take your autism elsewhere. I will be getting the last reply. Also I didn't read your post because I think very lowly if you for having autism.
>James Gunn isn't making the movies. Take your autism elsewhere.
...So you have absolutely zero evidence for your "he'll be a powerless Feige" claim? You're conceding that I was right you were just pulling shit out of your ass to defend the DCEU?
That's genuinely fricking pathetic to bootlick for a company.
James Gunn isn't making the movies. Take your autism elsewhere. I will be getting the last reply. Also I didn't read your post because I think very lowly if you for having autism.
>plugs and ears and starts throwing a tantrum because somebody caught him in a really stupid lie
holy kek, what an actual child.
Things that are true:
I haven't read your last 3 posts.
You have autism.
James Gunn isn't making the movies.
I will be getting the last reply.
Your reply to this post won't be read either.
Things that are true:
>You are a tantruming like baby because you got caught in an obvious lie
>You're lying about not reading my posts because you're too much of a child not to sate your curiosity
>This is you: "WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH WAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH"
STFU enraged employee, nobody cares that you feel like your vanity career is being ruined and you want to Lash out. Zaslav is a hero and something like what he did is coming for all bad animation and other bad media
A new level of cringe
No one cares what you typed up, lil bro. Go have a nice day.
Lul that's one for the screenshot collection. Angry about your career being ruined, but you never changed from being a frustrated unlovable kid.
new level of cringe
>He's not making the movies
He's already said that he's still directing.
Of course, but he isn't directing all the movies you moronic ape.
Gunn was in fact the actual Kevin Feige.
Him Favreau and yes fricking Whedon were the real power that made marvel into what it was.
Favreau started it off with Gunn pretty much designing everything up to the infinity stuff, which they #metoo'd him off of because they thought they could mechanically do with his choices what the did with Whedons' directing style.
Make it into a house style.
Problem is that no one has any vision other then the creepy as hell propoganda that Disney wants to put out.
I firmly believe if that surprisingly thick little bulldyke alonzo was kept on a leash and put inher place they could get really good stories out of her.
Some of the ideas she obviously brought to the mcu are really heartfelt but done terribly terribly wrong.
And feige is just a baseball cap wearing suit who takes credit for shit and has proven he doesn't know what the frick he's doing.
Just have feige as the suit. Get some big dick chad with good ideas to dick alonzo till she turns into a good little office b***h who knows her place and they can get some good shit going.
>feige is just a baseball cap wearing suit who takes credit for shit and has proven he doesn't know what the frick he's doing.
I've been calling MCU movies shit since pre-Avengers 1, but he consistently made Disney multi-billions for a decade. You don't repeatedly trip into that kind of success.
It doesn't matter how little I think those movies are good, because they're objectively successful.
>he consistently made Disney multi-billions for a decade
What did he do other then be in position to soak up credit?
If he can't keep the gravy train going and is proving that he litterally doesnt know what sells or what he's doing then he had basically nothing at all to do with Marvels succcess.
No really.
What did Feige personally have a hand in when it came to the success of the MCU IP.
I'll wait.
>He's not directing and writing all the movies
Are you suggesting that we can't look to his previous moves for information about his future style? What he likes and dislikes?
>He's basically just going to be Kevin Fiege with no power
Simping for a guy with no power.
I hope he does just to make your autistic ass seethe into oblivion.
Does what? I'm not going to be watching and MCU/DCU movies. Unlike the rest of you losers, I don't use tv and movies as the basis for my personality. Whether some shitter on Cinemaphile does something or a director/producer does something, changes nothing in my life.
I did not read a single word of your post. That's how little I think of you and your Asperger's syndrome. Thoughts?
>gaming
Is this why the CEOs of Rocksteady left?
I can’t bring myself to dickride Gunn.
GOTG 1 was great, GOTG2 was kinda mid and TSS was terrible, it felt like a South Park episode and not in a good way. Not entirely sure if he can carry an entire cinematic universe
>was kinda mid
I like James Gunn, but he cannot do serious. Not everything has to be funny.
He's not directing and writing every new DC movie, dumbass.
>Superman is into poop porn
>funny
If Superman has a fetish then it most likely is femdom. Lois must own a collection of Kryptonite strap-ones.
Superman's only fetishes are truth, justice, and the American way.
Do not sexualize awesome Clark.
how long are snydertards gonna be triggered about this joke?
the point is that Superman doesn't actually have a poop fetish, it's that Peacemaker is an unhinged idiot who would spread a rumor like that
Snydertards SEETHE at a harmless poop joke but are fine with Snyder inserting his NTR fetish and having Supes rise his wife’s son with Batman
The "jokes" turns out to be true according to the ending of Peacemaker when Wally confirms that they're true.
>Wally
I see what you did there
Anon, Snydertards have no brain please understand.
The joke is that Peacemaker is a crude butthole who doesn't even respect arguably the closest thing to a perfect man.
I thought it was a Chris Chan edit.
The only bad thing about this is that they are making their bible now instead of 8 years ago.
>ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
Because Gunn is just Nu-Whedon; he's just a gayer Whedon, too.
The Suicide Squad was great
>but the box off-
Don't care. I decide if something is good or not
James Gunn's ex wife fled Hollywood forever when she found out the truth about her husband
Don't care didn't ask.
These posts weren't meant for you.
So the DCEU is going to be run by a pedo and pajeets are celebrating.
Their other idol is "clearly-obsessed-with-homo-latex-SM" Matt Reeves
go figure
James Gunn did nothing wrong. He's a great guy!
Why are Cinemaphile incels so triggered by tepid edgy jokes you'd see on /b/?
why are groomers so eager to normalize pedo jokes?
Why are Gunn fans ok with Gunn's friendship with convicted child pornographer Hudson Huddleston? The hundreds of pedo joke tweets combined with his friendship with a convicted child pornographer, plus the fact that Gunn goes to "To Catch a Predator" themed parties in his free time dressed as a Catholic priest all seem a little sus. This is the guy DC Studios made the new head of their studio though, maybe they know something I don't.
James Gunn-the Woody Allen of capeshit movies
https://forums.mixedmartialarts.com/t/james-gunn-outed-as-a-pedophile/2730689/280?page=16
James Gunn is a pedophile? Based. So am I.
Pedophilia is good and based.
Things that are true:
I haven't read any of your posts.
You have autism.
James Gunn isn't making the movies.
I will be getting the last reply.
Your reply to this post won't be read either.
lefties are pedos
>Woody Allen of capeshit movies
So innocent?
Brother you're on a website where half the posters are some flavour of pedophile.
Its definitely creepy but I don’t think is something worth causing controversy, in the end there wasn’t any grooming or child harassment involved.
his personal life is none of my bussines if he makes good movies thats all i care about but this is capeshit so he probably doesn't
Cinemaphile autists have this weird compulsion to place everyone under standards they themselves could possibly ever meet.
Like imagine seriously crying about James Gunn making edgy jokes, while you're on Cinemaphile. You have to be so autistic that you just don't have any self awareness at all.
It's probably just reddit tourist or anons falseflagging. Don't pay to much attention to it and laugh at them.
>ok you miserable pieces of shit tell us all why this is a bad thing
WBD is already going down and they are fixing shit a few years too late.
They're picking up the pieces of an already shitty universe without a plan. Why would I be excited?
I don't think the DCEU is a thing anymore dude. Idk why people even pretend like it's been a thing after Snyder left.
Because it's still literally the same universe. Black Adam just came out & Aquaman 2 is next.
The Batman isn't, and neither will new DC movies. Those movies were already in preproduction before this entire shitshow.
The Batman isn't getting a sequel till at least 2025. Joker is also an outlier but the main focus is still the snyderverse.
>still
Again, you're talking about movies that have been in production for years now. You're delusional if you think James Gunn will be using the DCEU as the backbone of DC movies that will be coming out in 2025 onwards, like The Batman.
No evidence to the contrary & productions can be cancelled. Yet Blue Beetle is still in production right now along with other projects planned for the snyderverse movies.
Proof Blue Beetle is a snyderverse movie?
For the fans watching at home, his reply to this post won't have proof.
>like The Batman.
Which won't be connected to a greater DC universe and can't be a backbone.
There's a difference between "Gunn will stick to the general DCEU even if there'll be retcons/loose continuity", and "The Snyderverse and the original plans will be restored"
The way I see it, the DCEU died with Snyder. Not even WB uses that term anymore. Why does everything have to be restarted? What do you even mean by that? Do you mean recast? Because that's the only thing that gets carried between DC movies.
I didn't say anything about restarting.
My point is I don't even know what the DCEU even is in this context. Is the DCEU just when Henry Cavill is dressed as Superman? So now any DC movie where Henry Cavill is Superman is now a DCEU movie? These are just DC movies. The distinction makes no sense anymore.
They're all movies in the same vague canon, connected universe, simple as that.
What canon? The only thing that gets carried between DC movies is casting choices. Idk how that makes a universe. So if someone else plays Superman and Wonder Woman it's a new universe now?
Again,you're thinking too hard. These movies are seemingly something like James Bond in 1962-2004 going forward. Don't sweat the little things.
There's no reason to believe all these movies are a completely new universe unless otherwise said they're separate, like Joker or The BAtman.
>You're thinking too hard
You are by having this autistic distinction between DC and DCEU movies. There is none. They're all DC.
Anon, you're the one trying to get this "gotcha" moment in about them all being DC movies. Whether its DCEU, the DC movie universe, the Gunnverse, whatever they call it, the point is they're keeping that line of movies all more-or-less together in one continuity.
Keep saying DCEU as if typing out "EU" means literally anything, homosexual moron. They're DC movies. Get over yourself.
Yes they're DC movies, the connected ones for the time being.
None of them are connected anymore. They just have actors playing specific characters. That's not a universe. That's just called casting. There are no meaningful story elements that carry over between movies. I'm sorry you're just now learning the DCEU has been dead for years now.
are you psycho losers capable of having any real conversations about comics & movies?
>pedospammer mogged hard and ran from the thread
Kek
Gunn is a pedo
I'm a pedo too.
I wonder if Gunn and Ezra have molested some little boys together yet
I support pedophilia therefore I support James Gunn.
that would be so hot, they could dress as cowboys :3
>DC is finally building a bible
>except for their comics
Were DC fans the Mongol Horde in their past lives? What in the actual frick did you guys do to deserve this shit?
It's a bad thing because they didn't ask me, specifically to fix their company. Only I can save DC.
I'm not really a fan of Gunn's interpretation, or even the way he really does things. Suicide Squad wasn't a bad movie but really just wasteful in the beginning. I don't know who Safran is.
I hate movies
Movies are better than homosexual cape comics and cartoons.
More superhero movies is always bad. Also Gunn sucks ass.
Superhero movies are better than superhero comics.
Yes you hate everything, why would you like this?
How are 100+ posts in and homies still think James Gunn will be making these movies?
there is no way they can turn DC movies fate anymore
they have a lot of active movies and sequels, bunch of unconnected movies
what are you going to do at this point?
you cant kill everything because then nobody will work with you and rest of actors already mcu actors so
The Batman made $800m and it's unconnected.
Why do you autists think everyone demands MUH SHARED UNIVERSE shit like you do? Most people just want a solid ass movie first and foremost.
I think that's his point, you can't easily just cancel shit like that on a whim easily since it'd piss off a lot of people you're working with. DC is still trying to play like they can be the MCU when they can't even decide what they want to commit to. Do they want to make stand alones? Do they want to fix the DCEU they already have? What will be connected to what? They don't know the answer to any of this shit.
>dickriding that shitty movie this hard
I feel pretty bad for people who unironically believe there's going to be a sequel for The Batman or that Pattinson's going to reprise his role.
This board is infested with trannies and roasties, of course they would overhype that shit homosexual twink Battinson.
Considering Batman is their most popular character and it outgrossed by Doctor Strange, barely outgrossed Thor and will be outgrossed Black Panther. That’s not great.
Considering it's their most successful DC movie since Joker, yes it's great. Why do you think they immediately kneeled to Matt Reeves and gave him a movie deal? He fricking won.
Superheroes and their adaptations have been a disaster for popular culture.
Having a sense of direction should have been the first thing done long ago. Doing so now is the next best time.
im so goddamn tired of snyderbots
It's not, but they need to execute individual movies well and understand that the Trinity is the key
DC has been gifted with a set of main characters that everyone will immediately accept. The 8-10 story should center around them and branch off into other aspects of the universe when possible
>why this is a bad thing
Everything will become homogenous and lose all creative liberties and soul to ensure it all fits the branding of a collective DCEU
A bible is fine for a single project but having all works be forced to reference (cartoons, movies, games etc) is just a fricking terrible idea.
Marvel's MCU synergy killed my interest in the animation and games mostly. It'll suck if DC is going that route because the variety of animated shows and video games is what made them stand out. And the shitty synergy was already creeping in when they forced Rocksteady to make a Suicide Squad game instead of Superman one and based the team off of the DCEU versions.
>giving gunn more power
wow sure can't wait for this to backfire
it's not a bad thing to have a plan, it will all depend if the plan is shit or not lmao
wait for details to come out, then we'll see if it's shit
i just thought that WB's ongoing support of animated projects was interesting and Discovery's exec declaring that they brought in the Good MCU Guy so they can Become Marvel isn't really compelling to me.
I felt pretty done with marvel. I watched a few of their mcu shows halfway through and ultimately just lost interest. The support of unconventional things like primal felt novel.
I mean, why be excited? Zaslav's mission statement is "no more frivolous creative ventures, all franchises." he named Friends of all things as one of the juggernaut franchises he acquired. Gunn will probably make some funny, charming things, but the executive direction is just "produce slop."
Should be James Wan in charge