>This is problematic
Okay, I'll bite. How exactly is a pic Spidey chillin' with his family "problematic," OP? To me, this pic looks more wholesome than anything.
>Is J. Scott Campbell the most based Cinemaphile artist of the century?
Yes, he is.
I have a vague memory of this. Some nobody said some stupid shit about one of his covers being unrealistic and attempted a redraw(?) which Campbell then spun into a protracted "controversy" and "draw this in your style" art challenge. Honestly it felt kind of forced like he was intentionally trying to keep the flames going to promote himself and get some free art out of people. It was like he saw the shitflinging over that Manara spiderwoman cover and thought "I can milk some outrage too." At least it resulted in some decent cheesecake I guess.
The cover in OP is an homage to ASM 601, about which there was a bit of minor internet drama, including some Tumblr artists trying to redraw it with distant body proportions.
I have a vague memory of this. Some nobody said some stupid shit about one of his covers being unrealistic and attempted a redraw(?) which Campbell then spun into a protracted "controversy" and "draw this in your style" art challenge. Honestly it felt kind of forced like he was intentionally trying to keep the flames going to promote himself and get some free art out of people. It was like he saw the shitflinging over that Manara spiderwoman cover and thought "I can milk some outrage too." At least it resulted in some decent cheesecake I guess.
Your memory of it is completely wrong, first Campbell didn't flame anything, some moron on twitter tried to "fix" his art because it was too problematic, then people outside the ecochamber started ripping on the person who was "fixing" the art, eventually several other artists came racing to draw their own takes to either ride that small controversy or just take the piss.
That's when Campbell just calmly redrew his own art, and even tried to agree on some points that pest made on being anatomically inaccurate, but they were a disingenuous little b***h who got on the defensive after Campbell himself appeared, not taking his word as a form or support, but as an attack instead, the other pests that agreed with the "fixer" cried in the same tune, thinking the man himself shouldn't ever dare to peacefully offer his own piece of mind, and even redraw the cover for fun, actually agreeing on some points the "fixer" made.
>who got on the defensive after Campbell himself appeared, not taking his word as a form or support, but as an attack instead, the other pests that agreed with the "fixer" cried in the same tune, thinking the man himself shouldn't ever dare to peacefully offer his own piece of mind, and even redraw the cover for fun, actually agreeing on some points the "fixer" made.
What fricking crabs
>but they were a disingenuous little b***h who got on the defensive after Campbell himself appeared, not taking his word as a form or support, but as an attack instead, the other pests that agreed with the "fixer" cried in the same tune, thinking the man himself shouldn't ever dare to peacefully offer his own piece of mind, and even redraw the cover for fun
Why are they always like this?
Would they even allow something like that.
Your pic us allowed cause it's two guys and therefore okay to be shown. But two girls and one guy, no frickin way.
>beefy werewolf MJ and her beefy werewolf daughter
Frick that. I remember when beefy meant a masculine man with impressively masculine muscles. If it's not gay to like masculinely built women, then by George, it should be straight to like femininely built men!
>THAT...THAT is PETER PARKER'S SPIDERMAN BEING....IN AN HAPPY MARRIAGGE WITH HIS 10/10 REDHEAD WIFE AND THEIR KIDS!!! >I'M GOING INSAAAAAANEEEEEE >SAVE ME, MEPHISTOMAN
Not really.
>nerd attempts to "correct" his art
>absolutely rekts them in front of everyone
Is J. Scott Campbell the most based Cinemaphile artist of the century?
>This is problematic
Okay, I'll bite. How exactly is a pic Spidey chillin' with his family "problematic," OP? To me, this pic looks more wholesome than anything.
>Is J. Scott Campbell the most based Cinemaphile artist of the century?
Yes, he is.
What are you talking about about
I have a vague memory of this. Some nobody said some stupid shit about one of his covers being unrealistic and attempted a redraw(?) which Campbell then spun into a protracted "controversy" and "draw this in your style" art challenge. Honestly it felt kind of forced like he was intentionally trying to keep the flames going to promote himself and get some free art out of people. It was like he saw the shitflinging over that Manara spiderwoman cover and thought "I can milk some outrage too." At least it resulted in some decent cheesecake I guess.
The cover in OP is an homage to ASM 601, about which there was a bit of minor internet drama, including some Tumblr artists trying to redraw it with distant body proportions.
Why is this cover $100+ on ebay? Just because of the drama around it?
it's one of the more iconic covers in the medium
Anon is a schizo. Ignore him
nope, he's right and you're a gay
Your memory of it is completely wrong, first Campbell didn't flame anything, some moron on twitter tried to "fix" his art because it was too problematic, then people outside the ecochamber started ripping on the person who was "fixing" the art, eventually several other artists came racing to draw their own takes to either ride that small controversy or just take the piss.
That's when Campbell just calmly redrew his own art, and even tried to agree on some points that pest made on being anatomically inaccurate, but they were a disingenuous little b***h who got on the defensive after Campbell himself appeared, not taking his word as a form or support, but as an attack instead, the other pests that agreed with the "fixer" cried in the same tune, thinking the man himself shouldn't ever dare to peacefully offer his own piece of mind, and even redraw the cover for fun, actually agreeing on some points the "fixer" made.
>who got on the defensive after Campbell himself appeared, not taking his word as a form or support, but as an attack instead, the other pests that agreed with the "fixer" cried in the same tune, thinking the man himself shouldn't ever dare to peacefully offer his own piece of mind, and even redraw the cover for fun, actually agreeing on some points the "fixer" made.
What fricking crabs
>but they were a disingenuous little b***h who got on the defensive after Campbell himself appeared, not taking his word as a form or support, but as an attack instead, the other pests that agreed with the "fixer" cried in the same tune, thinking the man himself shouldn't ever dare to peacefully offer his own piece of mind, and even redraw the cover for fun
Why are they always like this?
you mean improve, she is even hotter now
He did it again, what a chad
>Is J. Scott Campbell the most based Cinemaphile artist of the century?
He is
>Is J. Scott Campbell the most based Cinemaphile artist of the century?
Yes
What do they mean by this
HE BOOPIN DA SNOOT!
He is finger the pussy
>a happily married Peter, with two kids, still has eyes for the black cat
Guess MJ is simply not good enough...
I think you're forgetting this is Jonathan Hickman we're talking about. Peter and MJ are going to meet Felicia at a swingers club and frick her.
Would they even allow something like that.
Your pic us allowed cause it's two guys and therefore okay to be shown. But two girls and one guy, no frickin way.
>Would they even allow something like that
If they were based, or a manga instead of a comic.
>a manga
>only two girls
Well this is a comic
Two is enough
And that they are of legal age is something out of the ordinary for the manga.
He's playing with his Black and whiteCat
Stick to your 616 Spider-man starring Paul.
Oh coo-
>ultimate spiderman
:/
PETER
PETER, STOP EJACULATING INSIDE YOUR HOT GINGER WIFE
THAT WASN'T YOUR DESTINY, PETER
YOUR DESTINY WAS TO FIGHT FOR YOUR LIFE AND BE HATED BY EVERYONE
PULL OUT OF YOUR WIFE AND TAKE ZE SPIDER BITE NOW PETER
I want to see middle aged daddy Peter seduced by hot teen Black Cat
>Middle Aged Peter and Jailbait Felicia
>original Ultimate Spider-Man
>older Black cat goes for jailbait Peter
>nu Ultimate Spider-Man
>older Peter goes for jailbait Black Cat
BRAVO HICKMAN
his butt is better than hers goddamn
>older Black Cat goes for jailbait Peter
She puked on his dick when she found out how young he was. I was so disappointed in her.
They did Maximoff twincest but couldn't commit to milf Felicia hooking up with young Peter. Aaaahhhhhh I never win.
>Aaaahhhhhh I never win
Just like mainline Peter nowdays, kek.
>Cat ears, but only in one panel
I mean, what if it's a boy?
A friend his son for example
Felicia is the family cat according to campbell
Now I want to see a version of that cover but with beefy werewolf MJ and her beefy werewolf daughter
>beefy werewolf MJ and her beefy werewolf daughter
Frick that. I remember when beefy meant a masculine man with impressively masculine muscles. If it's not gay to like masculinely built women, then by George, it should be straight to like femininely built men!
>it should be straight to like femininely built men!
Good news
>If it's not gay to like women, it shouldn't be gay to like men!
e-girlta...
Cute
why is everything covered in jizz
does pete get a check for people putting his designs and likeness on shit?
no, but kingpin does, he owns the rights of spider-man
I simply dont like Campbells art. Not because it’s sexy (I love Bruce timms art) but the faces in general look weird
>THAT...THAT is PETER PARKER'S SPIDERMAN BEING....IN AN HAPPY MARRIAGGE WITH HIS 10/10 REDHEAD WIFE AND THEIR KIDS!!!
>I'M GOING INSAAAAAANEEEEEE
>SAVE ME, MEPHISTOMAN
>filthy ginger children
Yes it is
omg that is not how someone sits on a couch
Yeah that cup is gonna fall
this is unreadable
WHERE ARE THE CHARTS HACKMAN
He's saving them for when Maker comes out of the city as some ultra gigamaxxed one hundred million IQ temporal monstrosity final boss.
Didn't ultimate spiderman die years ago? When did he come back?
This is an all new, all different ultimate universe.
>make a universe unburdened by a century of canon
>brick it with convoluted continuity
>repeat
For you. Not for me.
Is this a real cover? Or is it a reprint cover or something?
It's a limited edition variant cover that you can get for an as yet unspecified but certainly extortionate price.
Yeah, the main problem is that May is not naked.
wtf!
Why is MJ such a feet bawd?
Well, according to several authors, her best attributes are always from the waist down.
Which I fully support.
so is this series good? it really would be nice to have a new spider-man comic i consistently read and enjoy. haven’t had one of those in years.
It's decent enough. Kind of slow though.
Red hair is a recessive gene. Those aren't Peter's kids
May is Peter's real mom and had red hair :^)
Yeah!
The American Dream is dead!
Long live the status quo!