Too much iron in your blood.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Too much iron in your blood.
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tip Your Landlord Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
We're the future, Charles. Not them.
They were really mean to that fat security guard. It's funny how tolerance and acceptance stops if you're overweight and a bit of a slob lmao
Yes. Fat people are an acceptable target because it's something they can control. Just put down the fricking fork and stop chugging soda, fat ass.
This. And if you still live with your parents in your mid 20s you're a loser.
But what if the housing market around is real shit?
Black personbrained take. This is why so many White Westoids are broke AF. I just inherited 2 million dollar home because I stayed home and helped take care of my ageing Father who is 80. Meanwhile you'll be renting from chinks until you die.
okay anon I'll go live with your rich parents for some payola, good plan.
protip: nobody is racist because the actual colour of one's skin, it's a response to the actions of those with that skin colour. Actions are a choice. Just put down the knife and stop raping woman, black ass
Triggered fatty detected.
I'll grind your bones to make my bread, skinny
Easy there, lard ass. Don't get too worked up or your heart might give out.
Racism is just classism in disguise. Nobody just hates black people. They hate Black folk, Is the easiest way to say it. Although I do dislike that word.
>Racism is just classism in disguise. Nobody just hates black people. Rich and middle class people hate poor people
How could you fail at writing out the basic conclusion of your own presupposition.
Imagine being so stupid and hateful. Lol. I'm so based I'm gonna go sit in the sauna and listen to cumtown. Watagay
No it isn't
Literally isn't a choice for Black folk to murder and rape. It's apart of what they are.
>Only fat fricks would be seduced by prime Rebecca Romijn
>something they can control
>what is hypothyroidism
Don't give me that shit, you coping lard ass. The overwhelming majority of fat asses can absolutely control their weight if they weren't so lazy. I'll say it again: PUT DOWN THE FRICKING FORK AND STOP CHUGGING SODA.
Yes, anon, I am coping because I consume <500 calories a day and still never lose weight. Go first frick yourself, then have a nice day, you c**t.
Uh huh. I'm sure you are the special exception.
>hypothyroidism
>the absolute maximum of variation is 5kg
kek
lmao even
>tolerance and acceptance stops if you're overweight and a bit of a man
fix'd
I'm a relatively good looking straight white male except in the last few years I went from a muscular 85kg to a 130kg hambeast. I'm 5'11. I'm losing around 1kg every ten days at the minute and so I will lose all this fat, but one graceful lesson it's taught me is that there is no excuse to be fat at all. Unless you're depressed because your children die in a car wreck or something.
I deserve to be bullied at my weight. It's only right. Just as I will bully others when I lose this fat. Every single day feels disgusting as a fat c**t. To be fully disgusted by obese landwhales I had to become like them, and it was truly eye opening.
Shut up
Based.
I hate ez-fatties even worse than fatties.
if I ever find out someone I know used to be fat, that's the only way I can see them. disgusting.
they are just fat lazy blobs hiding inside of seemingly normal bodies, but that which made them fat in the first place is still in them, their own weak mind.
it's just like a coal burner can never be purged of its vileness, it is forever tainted.
false flag Black person
meds
>it's just like a coal burner can never be purged of its vileness, it is forever tainted
t.
Black personbrained take.
How do you feel about underweight people? It seems easy to not be fat to me. You just don't eat as much.
But gaining weight as an underweight person is hard because there's just no room in the stomach. "Just eat more", they say, but the stomach is full. You have to constantly eat until you're sick.
Just eat homie lmao
You can literally drink calories
But you need protein to gain muscle. Drinking 5 milkshakes per day would just make me fat. Right?
if you're trying to bulk up then you only need to add 500 calories to your maintenance and 1.5 grams of protein for every pound of bodyweight. For some this might just require a protein shake and two large glasses of full fat milk
What if milk gives me horrible IBS diarrhea? I'm talking the explosive kind. The kind where people think an oldtimer car is reversing, the kind that could put a whale's blowhole expunge to shame.
You might as well drink 5 bottles of coke in order to gain weight. Get some starch instead.
When I was a sticc I got to a normal weight after like a year of eating 3 full (european) meals a day, working out 4-5 days a week. I ate like normal things like 4-5 egg-omelette for breakfast and half a kilo of cottage cheese after the gym.
Cottage cheese makes me barf and shit myself.
That's why you get the lactose-free ones anon.
you're a moronic fat homosexual for ever getting fat in the first place, losing it just makes you slightly less pathetic
The component of male lived experience that is wholly unaccessible to women, more than any other, is the colossal and abyssal apathy of the universe towards you. Women cannot relate to this, except perhaps women of exceptional ugliness, childless crones, and FtM transexuals.
The apathy of the universe is bottomless, and to a man, uniquely to a man, he begins to feel this apathy even from a very young age, he becomes the object of a radical indifference.
I enjoy the option to just not engage and blend in, here and there. As an average or less man you really do have the ability to just stand almost anywhere and camouflage yourself in the apathy of the universe. People really won’t see you, or they just assume you’re the man who stands there doing nothing all day and that’s normal, like you would think about a bird or a raccoon
You have to be 6/10 to pull this off. If you are ugly people will try to mess with the autist
In college guys used to mess with me all the time but girls liked me and would do stuff like cook for me and wash my clothes and bring me to parties. Why?
Cause you're a faaaaaaaaaaaag
This fricking guy has to say something about this every fricking thread like this.
This is why we had religion-based societies. You were worth something as a man in those.
Humility also plays a large large part in religion. You were important because you had a job but in most religions the job isn’t about you
I'm sure they'll resurface again. Young men today are kept quiet by drugs / porn / games and in the meanwhile they're promised that they too can become chad and finally begin a successful life (which won't happen)
Enough of this lie and equilibrium will be re-established
how do you measure one's worth, and how are men lacking in that compared to women
The flip side of that coin is that it's a man's responsibility to build and foster a community which loves and supports him. Create healthy, meaningful relationships with your friends, family, and neighbors and suddenly the universe's indifference isn't so shitty.
>colossal and abyssal apathy of the universe towards you
No I think this is just a "you"-problem. Most people have friends, get attention, do something with their lives.
Oh okay sorry I guess the problem with MOST people in general then is none of them have been lonely before lol
Have you met people? Loneliness is an inherent part of the human condition.
You feeling bad about yourself doesn't make you special.
bro you are acting like reddit incarnated. Take away the mask and try to think of what is really going on.
I can only hope you'll never be hit by the realization all at once, that will hurt
>Take away the mask and try to think of what is really going on.
What do you imagine is "really" going on
He thinks he's being deep
Yes I gathered that, but I'd still like him to explain his worldview.
Not that anon, but you're an insufferable normie if you cannot understand what he wrote. As far as I'm concerned, if you've never felt the indifference of the universe, then I can never trust you with any position of responsibility. For it is only the people who fully comprehend the cold indifference of the universe who can be trusted with any measure of power, as they will not be pushed to scramble for more of it in pursuit of extrinsic praise.
A man who has felt the indifference of the universe and overcame it is the only one who can be trusted with power, because their source of motivation is necessarily intrinsic.
I don't particularly understand because you're both (if you indeed are different idiots) writing in extremely unspecific terms and using tautological arguments
Can you define exactly what you mean with "Cold indifference of the universe", explain why experiencing this is a male thing, and why you need to "overcome it" to achieve intrinsic motivation?
Are you just doing a less intelligent and more misogynistic version of existentialism here?
>male thing
Because women are inherently valued in the human species. You are moronic or immature if you cannot see this.
>why this leads to intrinsic motivation
Because someone who has been supported by society does not need to develop intrinsic motivation. This isn't rocket surgery you smoothbrain. People who are primarily social and have been supported by others will continue to expect that as a source of their motivation. Those same people will falter the moment they have no one who can praise them.
This is also why so many of these morons (again, mostly female) start to falter and develop so-called "imposter syndrome" when they get to positions of leadership. It's them not knowing how to fricking motivate themselves outside of praise from others.
Males are also inherently valued, just in different ways.
>Because someone who has been supported by society does not need to develop intrinsic motivation
Uhh yeah they do, have you ever been to, say, a university? Lots of normal people there, supported by society, with lots of different sources of motivation for something quite difficult (inevitably some will be social/"extrinsic" and some will be personal/"intrinsic", no one is "pure").
I think you're being confused by social roles, and confusing "motivation" with "self-esteem" (judging by your nonsensical mention of impostor syndrome).
>I think you're being confused by social roles, and confusing "motivation" with "self-esteem" (judging by your nonsensical mention of impostor syndrome).
>nonsensical
You're an unironic midwit, holy shit. I default to calling everyone moronic, but I guess I need to actually dumb my posts down a bit.
The self-esteem movement is garbage, all of it. I take it you must be in your mid 30s if you think the idea has any merit to it. Modern psychology has moved away from it as being a dangerous mistake, someone anyone with a lick of common sense could have told you 20 years ago.
https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/psychiatric-disorder/201504/the-horrors-self-esteem
The reason so many women, and yes it is women who principally develop "impostor syndrome", is because they were reared from birth to be achievers. This was done for a variety of reasons, most of which stem from feminism and women empowerment. The problem is, girls and boys are motivated differently. In school, girls generally respond more to praise and boys generally respond more positively to competition. By changing the education system as we have, we've made it more girl-friendly than boy friendly, resulting in a crop of leaders who have been raised in the girl-friendly manner of positive reinforcement and praise than the boy-friendly manner of competition and dominance.
The latter method teaches would-be leaders that they aren't shit compared the world and the universe. When you get your face pushed down into the mud, you realize how insignificant you are. This never happens in a more female-oriented education system. No one gets their shit kicked in, so when they reach positions of leadership, their very fragile egos get shattered and they think they aren't worthy of the position they've attained, regardless of their own ability. Compare this to someone who fought to get this position and faced off a lifetime of competition. They will rest easy knowing they deserve the top spot.
Out of curiosity anon, where do you work? I ask because you seem to think that cooperation and competitiveness are inherently opposed to each other, which is really destructive from a organisational point-of-view.
Hey, everything I wrote in that post is just reformulated from what you wrote.
Senior software engineer.
>cooperation and competitiveness are inherently opposed to each other
They are on opposite poles of social interaction, yes. In a state of nature, cooperation happens in the in-group and competition happens with the out-group. I understand modern globohomosexual society has placed the individual at the center of everything, ergo it has attempted to blend competition with cooperation, but it doesn't work. Literally any management 101 class will tell you this.
The team is the in-group. The success and cooperation of the in-group is essential to its long-term success. Competition must not happen within the group, but with other groups. You must see your team as your tribe, so to speak.
This is also why it's generally a good idea to either isolate high performing antisocial morons or cut them from your team, if they are dragging morale down. High performers need to be alone or surrounded by other high performers (the Space-X model)
>reformulated
Yeah, reworded through your own garbage filter with your own biases. I (rightfully) ignored it.
>software engineer is autistic
Big shock
>I (rightfully) ignored it.
Why? Was there a part of it that you felt was an inaccurate characterization of you, or that you didn't write that?
>cooperation happens in the in-group and competition happens with the out-group
How can you argue that males are wired for dominance or whatever, and then argue that "in the state of nature" groups are inherently cooperative (feminine, if we connect it to your original argument)? While it might be useful to differentiate between cooperation and competition in a theoretical sense, in practice the links between them are likely more ambiguous, especially if we're talking about high-performing individuals.
But even if we're talking about like, a football team, or children (speaking of a state of nature), it's pretty obvious that you can work towards a common goal and still have some healthy competition.
I mean yeah probably but we're on Cinemaphile so can you blame me?
Because I'm being realistic. Also, the education system was explicitly tooled for women. Everything I wrote is backed by research.
>mysoggyknees
Frick off you leftist moron. One of the smartest people I know is my sister who now works as an EE professor. Do you know what she did as a child?
>spelling competitions
>mock trial
>model un
>music competitions
>chemistry internships
Et cetera. Her ability to hold up as a leader of her lab was forged in the competitions she did as a child. Do you know how many other girls were like her? Practically none.
Competition breeds leaders and nothing else. That is its role in modern society. That propensity to lead obviously must be tempered with social skills obtained from various soft skill activities, for the same reason a completely hardened blade is brittle while a hard edge with a soft spine is strong.
This is all far from the original topic. The point is, unless you're some ordinary guy or an exceptionally ugly woman, you will, generally speaking, not know how indifferent the world actually is. Compare this to the life of an attractive woman, who gets hundreds of DMs from random strangers every day.
You have to be on the bottom of society at some point to understand intrinsic worth.
Autismo, I'll be clear: I'm writing in direct response to what you are arguing and I find it nonsensical. I'm pointing out the flaws in your reasoning, you're not internally coherent apart from "beautiful women more likely to be dumb" (which I will grant you is pretty common, but that's not the argument here).
You are not being convincing by ignoring your problems and talking about your sister, ugly/beautiful women or blades or spines or whatever.
It really just drives the point home that you don't know what you're talking about.
I don't know how I can make the thesis any clearer to you moron.
>How can you argue that males are wired for dominance or whatever, and then argue that "in the state of nature" groups are inherently cooperative
What part of in-group and out-group do you not understand? If you want to dig deep into human nature, men will generally fall into a hierarchy when among other men and will compete when it comes to women. At large, one group will compete with other groups for survival. The sliding relationship between cooperation and competition depends upon context. This, however, does not translate well to the individual, no matter how much neoliberal society wants to make it so.
Competition is also a bad word to use here since there are at least two different types of competition, fair competition and backstabbing competition. Men compete in fair competition to sort themselves into a hierarchy. That is the kind of competition you want, generally speaking as a society. The other type of competition, which is the backstabbing kind, you generally want to discourage. This is the kind of competition that modern society encourages more than the former, and as far as I can see, it is not limited to one gender.
nta but your argumentation amounts to throwing out aphorisms that fit your worldview and trying to sound profound. it's ok if you have an opinion but don't pretend it's worth presenting as more than that
>aphorisms
Where? I'm literally describing the evolutionary mechanisms that got us here. This isn't some Tao te Ching shit. You're unironically too stupid to understand what I wrote and you're also too stupid to see how dumb you are.
>What aphorisms
>This isn't some Tao te Ching shit
>>The propensity to lead obviously must be tempered with social skills obtained from various soft skill activities; a completely hardened blade is brittle while a hard edge with a soft spine is strong ching chong ping pong
Original anon, but you could have fooled me
My honest opinion is that I think that workplaces (at least in my experience) are cooperative on the surface while concealing underlying intra-group competitive behaviours, but maybe that's just my competitiveness/insecurity talking.
i don't think you are mentally equipped to speculate over the evolutionary processes that brought us here. your arguments have about as much merit as me claiming that you, specifically, were evolved to suck my dick because of your big dumb mouth that never shuts up
I've enjoyed reading your argument with the other guy. It's ironic he said autismo when he keeps viewing working together and competition as black and white as possible. It's almost as if the enemy of my enemy is my friend would set him off because it doesn't match how he views things
Thanks, it feels infuriating because it seems so goddamned obvious but people are treating it like some holy aphorism delivered from up on high.
Healthy competition is natural to well-socialized men. It was crucial for our ancestors to know which men could lead the hunt and which ones were meant to follow. It is not as much to women, who evolved with different considerations in mind. Granted, individual variation is paramount and I welcome any woman who will step up to the challenge of competition. But it is no surprise that women, at large, prefer social games where there are no winners or losers over competitive games where there is an obvious winner and a bunch of losers.
That said, it has its limits and competition should not be a continuous mode of being. Though I am loathe to use the word, the most "toxic" people I've worked with treat everything in life as a competition. They do not see their teams as a tribe and thus will step on them any chance they get.
This is a failure of societal organization, as far as I'm concerned. The people in charge of our country know that competition = innovation, but treat it as some kind of manna from heaven, like the cargo cults worshiping the airplanes. In reality, all it does it sort out and instill leadership tendencies in the best among us. Once it has done its job, the chosen leader MUST learn cooperation and soft skills if they wish to succeed.
Agreed, but I would also like to expand on the competition parts. As we all know, man-on-man dicksucking was crucial to our ancestors. Back in the hunter-gatherer times, our dicks evolved with bright-red bulbous heads because we would be trained to find them exceedingly suckable, as the strawberries and other treats of the time were also red and round. The best gatherers would also be the best dicksuckers, creating a powerful axiom that lasts to this day. Alan Turing was a big dicksucking gay, and he created the first computer. If we are to survive the next century, we need to return to our roots and dramatically increase our male on male fellatio action.
Again anon: this is just your opinion (and not a particularly interesting one), not a description of how "our ancestors" lived or how people in general objectively work.
You are being very pretentious.
>says I'm wrong
>doesn't explain why
>BECAUSE YOU JUST ARE, OKAY???
This is the most soi filled post I've read all day.
your posts aren't based on anything except a bunch of "i feel" sentiments
And how!!!
I actually just pointed out that it's your opinion, not that it's necessarily wrong. The only thing I've done is try to point out the flaws in your reasoning, since that's the only thing on display here, not facts.
That this is just your opinion is obvious to everyone.
Observing human behavior is based on just that. Observations. What is a "fact"? You don't even realize how stupid you sound. But, such is the curse of the white man.
I am neither of the people in this argument. But this anon is wrong and stupid.
I don't get it, do you think it's a good thing or a bad thing that men get treated like shit?
(Cont from
)
Note that you'd be less stupid if you stopped expressing yourself in general terms, as though you're really talking about Society in general, and just admitted that this is how you view people:
"I (a man) do not feel like I am supported by society, and I think that women are. I feel like I have to motivate myself to do things, because people do not encourage me and I see women being encouraged."
"I feel slighted/inferior to them, but I also view this self-encouragement as a source of strength, so I ("people like me") should be in charge."
>Note that you'd be less stupid if you stopped expressing yourself in general terms
Arguing for specifics and qualifications when none are needed is the hallmark of a midwit, midwit. Go back to your shitty poli sci class or whatever fricking midwit hole you crawled out of.
I was joking, I think you’re a little quick to assume you’re the smartest one here
>t. moron lacking any self-awareness of his condition
I think one part of it all that you miss is that men mostly are the ones doing this to themselves and the others. You don't have to fear that some woman will go full moron and stab you in the kidney dozen of times like you can with a man. Women don't start wars and don't send males to die pointlessly for someone else's selfish goals.
>introduced cracking an old man across the face with a nightstick
Yeah it was totally that he was fat that was the issue.
>introduced cracking a mass murdering terrorist across the face
Seems based to me.
>abusing a helpless elderly prisoner is based
But I thought mutants were supposed to be superior?
>nooooooo you can't uses plastic for everything aaaaaah help me Mystique.
Pretty sure a cop did the same thing to whitey Bulger and got his whole life/career ruined as a result
In his first scene he's shown abusing Magneto as a prisoner.
>In his first scene he's shown abusing Magneto as a prisoner.
Wait, he role played as a prisoner while abusing Magneto? What a sick frick
>Orange is not your colour, Mr. Laurio
>fat butthole dies
>incels start whining about "muh fat acceptance" "mean misandrists"
Like clockwork, but seriously, grow up.
shut up fatty
Bald men are more unfairly bullied. Being fat is fully something you do to yourself. Bald just happens and you cant stop it other than taking troony pills. I'm 5'10 and 170 pounds and bald
>this is what baldies actually believe
Never trust a beautiful woman anon esp one interested in you
Yep biggest red flag around. The globalists tried a couple times with women and I always call them out on it and it's so funny to watch them seethe and try to gaslight me
>I-I'm not a globalist anon what's wrong with you
>Y-you sound like such a schizo right now
>Why are you being like this?
Why are you being like this is the best one, like you're trying to get me to join one of the most ancient and evil death cults in the history of the world and literally worship a demon but I'm the fricking unreasonable one?
I swear to God dating apps make me doubt the existence of any female that's not a divorced landwhale.
They're supposed to be evil, remember?
He was a dumb brute. Literally his first appearance is smacking Magneto in the face with his baton.
>overweight
spoken as if he was only a few pounds over the norm
>a bit of a slob
>a bit
one of the best (you) farmer posts I've ever seen
Howdy, newbie! Enjoy your first week on Cinemaphile?
He was literally an antisemite
haha this very much.
He was white... imagine this happening to a brave, fat-positive, lesbian BIPOC hippo, would never. If that character existed xhe'd probably have some smart quip to BTFO magneto then some other BIPOC troony comes to save magneto and magneto doesn't escape on his own
Frick israelites btw
lose some weight you fat frick
this
t. fattie ( ._.)
That old homosexual is too good for capeshit.
Foxmen were capekino.
Such a great movie.
I was 10 when this came out and I thought this scene was the most kino fricking thing ever
lol what a baby, i was 11 at the time
I was 65, son.
Haha baby Black folk I was 12 and did and still thought this was one of the most epic comic book scenes ever
lmao homosexual I was 13 and thought it was one of the kinos of all time
>let me take your steel balls
OK, nobody cares if you're gay, just shut up
how do non-alchies even get fat
like, I only got fat twice because I was drinking like mad for months
how are people able to eat 4k calories per day without alcohol?
this
i was thin/muscular before alcohol and the first few years after
now not only does the alcohol fatten me, but i always eat to make sure i'm not drinking on an empty stomach, i read somewhere that true lost alkies lose their appetite and they wither and die with drinking on an empty stomach too
I drink everyday and even I'm not fat. I have a hard time even consuming enough food to make gains.
I want to frick Mystique
me too specially is she morphs into cyclops
This.
Yes.
how do go from that to a israelite cum bucket?
Jennifer Lawrence would never.
I think she looks better without the makeup
what happens if she has to take a giant shit?
>that perfect tummy
That dyke at the bottom must be in agony
>believes Rebecca Romijn was sexually interested in him
He deserved it.
>the actor was so tired of filming this scene that he sat down one day and cried, saying it wasn't why he started acting
Wrong movie
X2 was a colossal improvement over the first film.
your body has millions of holes
This scene was absolute kino
>Never trust a beautiful woman, especially one that's interested in you.
>xenophobic israelite main character
How did they get away with it?
Do not engage the schizo.
Didn't they put iron in his food? Cause even if he had too much iron in his blood magnetman couldn't get it out because it's chemically bonded to an organic molecule and thus not magnetic.
Mystique drugged him and injected him with iron.
Yes, it's a fricking dumb scene. They had to do something to spring Magneto. Just having Mystique frick half the prison and opening his cell wouldn't have been empowering enough.
Mystique seduced the guard, then knocked him out and injected metals directly into his body.
Granted that probably would be fatally toxic too but hey, Magneto was gonna kill him with it anyway
>saves your capeshit
>Are we ever going to start a game, Charles?
I was referencing this scene constantly when all the vax magnet videos were happening kek
>Ah there it is
>Too much cholesterol
>Guard has a fatal heart attack
>Too little sugar in your blood
>Guard feels lightheaded and woozy, goes to lunch
>scene about a guy with metal controlling powers escaping from a plastic prison
>thread full of faux-philosophical drivel about MEN and MEN'S PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE
>be me
>oh cool an x2 thread!
>click on thread
>conversation devolved into incel Cinemaphile shit
>realize this shitty website is literally all I have in my shitty pathetic loser life
>contemplate suicide for the 11th time today
nah everythings gonna be alright
there could have been relevant conversations...
Too much lyin' in your blood
>beep beep
>whoah dude you have some metal in you
>phew thank god we have metal detectors that was scary
>maybe that was that chick last night that knocked you out with a roofie lets tell the police
JAKE GYLLANHAAL FOR WOLVERINE
X2 > Raimi Spider-Man 2
fact: white people evolved from cum
proof: just look at what color the yare
Weird thread.
MR. LAAAAURIO
For me its a lack of zinc.
Come back, zinc...come back
Kino.
>Too much Byron in your club
Magneto departs the Poets Society
ha haaaaa!
Metal
X2 is definitely the best X-Men film
I can still remember how mind blowing the opening sequence was. Bryan Singer may be a creepy gay, but he’s got some moves when it comes to making movies.
That scene still holds up
I know X-Men was the first in its series and the first attempt at a more "realistic" superhero take rather than stylized or cartoony, and also that it got its budget slashed before production with pretty rushed filming. But god damn does X2 blow it out of the water hilariously in terms of action and spectacle. Wolverine in the mansion, Nightcrawler in the White House, Magneto's escape, Wolverine fighting Deathstrike, etc versus the slow plodding obvious wirework from the first film.
Yeah a definite upgrade from 2 to 1 but I have a soft spot for elements of the first. Days of Future Past and Wolverine are also very good.
X-Men 1 does have one or two brief kino moments action wise, but yeah definitely obvious it's the director's first outing on a more blockbuster scale.
Why can't we get similar scenes in the mcu
this was a good one
X2 > Days of Future Past > Logan > X-Men > First Class > The Wolverine >> Apocalypse >> The Last Stand >>> Phoenix >>>> New Mutants
magneto is so OP
My blood is cold.
that guard wouldn't able to show up that day due to heavy metal poisoning
Has he lost his mind?
Can he see or is he blind?
Can he walk at all?
Or if he moves, will he fall?
too much kino in your capeshit
When I was a kid I tried to design my own super heroes/villains. One of them had the power to control the shit inside anyone's bodies. I put people from my class in my comics and in one panel I had my super villain, The Shitter, force the hottest girl in my class to have the wettest sloppiest diarrhea of all time. She just happened to be a cheerleader and was at the top of a cheer pyramid at the time.
Terrific, another shit, off-topic thread on glorious /teevee/.
This is not the thread I thought it would be when I opened it.
The scene really did do a great job of driving home what a disgusting person he was.
I just remember him being fat, sweaty, and drinking loudly.
I just understood he was not sympathetic.