What is Cinemaphile's thoughts on the Madagascar films?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
What is Cinemaphile's thoughts on the Madagascar films?
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Nothing Ever Happens Shirt $21.68 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
sexo hippo...
Why don't you start by giving us your own opinion first, you pathetic waste of oxygen? Maybe then threads like these would not constantly mar the image and quality of our catalog and then dissapear in the archives with only a handful of moronic replies a la
only to be repeated again and again and again..
Last but not least,
Thank you for your invaluable insight in matters of modern international culture gentlemen. I salute you.
People are gonna call you a sperg but you're right honestly
Her butt + my face = me in heaven...literally and figuratively.
>I AM NOT A REAL SHARKSLAYER
Furry fandom goes on
Only the first film one was any good.
Everything else related to it is basically vapid emptyness.
First one is the worst one and was a cheap The Wild ripoff. The sequels were actually fun tho.
First one is great
First one was made at the same time and on the same building as Shrek 2. It seems that all the charm that you'd expect Shrek 2 to have (after the charming first Shrek) ended up going to Madagascar instead.
Totally agree with this. First Madagascar is insanely better than Shrek 2. In fact, Shrek 2 is an overrated, boring, unfunny, outdated, visually unnapealing and vapid piece of garbage. Also annoying villains, the only good thing is puss in boots, the rest is trash, one of the worst DreamWorks efforts, vastly inferior to Antz, Shrek or kung fu Panda 2.
You again?
Is it worse than Shark Tale?
Yes
Bump
The second film was my favorite as a child.
I like em big
First one was a blockbuster. 6th highest grossing movie from 2005.
>main series is shit
>spin-offs are gold
Any other examples of this? Madagscar wouldn't stand the test of time without The Penguins and King Julien.
Not Cinemaphile but Pokémon
There was clearly more thought and passion put into the side characters than the main ones.
I can tolerate the mediocrity of the main series because we got two utterly golden shows out of it. Now give me my fricking complete series release of Penguins, Nickelodeon.
They knew. They knew what they were doing
Gloria's bellybutton is very hypnotic
As well as her perfect butt
First one is ok, never saw the second, third one I still remember that damn afro circus commercial.
Penguins were always the highlight
the first two were pretty good, but the main characters literally go and join a circus in the 3rd one?
yeah that one was kinda dumb tbh
the second movie was the only good one
Unironically love the series. I rewatched the films a couple months back and I was still laughing my ass off at them.
Dreamworks needs to kiss Tom McGrath‘s ass for saving this mess of a franchise.
What do you mean?
I'm curious
%2asipstea%2a%E2%98%95%EF%B8%8F
this video made that movie so much better haha
Funny, interesting characters and art style. DIdn't try to be an everything salad like most Pixar movie.
>Shrek : 83 minutes
>Shrek 2 : 82 minutes/50 seconds
>Madagascar : 79 minutes/10 seconds
>Madagascar 2 : 79 minutes/50 seconds
>Kung Fu Panda : 83 minutes/12 seconds
>Kung Fu Panda 2 : 81 minutes/10 seconds
Would it have killed Dreamworks to give a longer runtime to those second installments? I'm obviously excluding the end credits in all of them.
>HTTYD : 89 minutes
>HTTYD 2 : 92 minutes
Now that's more like it. Still an inferior sequel imo.
>Toy Story : between 76 and 77 minutes
>Toy Story 2 : between 85 and 86 minutes
This is one reason why Pixar is taken more seriously.