What's the ugliest movie ever made?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
What's the ugliest movie ever made?
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Shopping Cart Returner Shirt $21.68 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
Tim Burton Alice in Wonderland
This or the transformers movies.
Transformers is kino
>More greebles is heckin' GOOD!
That's what the cg nerds "designing" this shit thought.
Raging
Source?
Bumblebee 2018, be warned though that the this stuff is a very small part of the film.
I see. Thanx anon
went to see this with my gf and it was kino
>watching BMWF propaganda
have a nice day
if you are watching the bmwf shit and not the big cool robots there is something wrong with you
It didn't have to be in the movie at all homosexual, it adds nothing to the story and is clearly the director/writer's thinly veiled fetish
not him but I don't remember a goddamn thing about this movie. I just remember the robots looking cool.
Literally flawless shockwave design though
Arcee's porcelain doll face is extremely frickable
Thanks for posting these.
This looks like a fricking cartoon
Yeah it's awesome
It's like 99% motion blur.
That's what makes it kino.
God I really need to rewatch the transformers franchise all the way through. I only saw up to dark of the moon.
Need me some comfy late 2000s kino from the first few films and explosionmeme kino from the rest.
transformers sound-design is kino tho
>OH N-
>Optimus Warcrime
I was thinking about what's so awful about these movies and it's the issue of over-emphasizing the character detail.
Like your brain can't process the amount of detail and it's annoying to watch.
It's why high frame rate is a bad meme. Too much detail can be a bad thing unless you're watching sports.
>get shot through the torso in the back while laying prone
>fly vertically into the air in the direction opposite to the force being applied
He flew from the explosion it made you fricking idiot. I love how Bay makes films for intellectuals that filters morons like. The homosexual morons unironically can't comprehend what's going on.
>I love how Bay makes films for intellectuals
boy you sure do read some things on here
>it's good! you just have to fill in the gaps yourself! it's like getting a puzzle in a movie!
cope
No, you just need to have a brain processing speed above moron level.
Take that back about Transformers c**t
Go back to fricking Reddit, I'm actually fricking pissed off Holy shit. Where the frick do you gays come from
Both good answers. The Cat In The Hat is pretty goddamn hideous too.
Frick you
Cat in the Hat is gaudy but it actually commits to an aesthetic.
>entire film is just shit brown
>every shot is an obvious greenscreen
>obnoxious bloom everywhere
What happened to you Burton? His 80s and 90s films were always beautiful
The premise of these ones suck, I'd sooner a live action regular fricking retelling of Alice in wonderland but the "THERES A WAR AND WONDERLAND IS DYING" motif really fricking immediately fricks up the potential for aesthetics. That said he still could have had the colors and imagery and maybe made it a shattered world instead of WonderIraq
me on the left
(and on the far left again)
>make Alice in Wonderland
>make it brown and grey
?????????
I thought the card soldiers fighting chess pieces was pretty cool
Season 3 of The Terror, Tuunbaq returns.
Intentional uncanny valley
this looked really good quite frankly. the only thing i disliked was the shitty mad hatter breakdance scene after the last battle.
>every shot is a greenscreen
>every scene has a brown filter over it
Walt would be mad if he knew they casted this skeleton to play Alicia
The sequel did actually remember to have colors
Alice's actress aged bafflingly badly in only six years though.
Kino dress
Quite possibly this. They raped the source material and it was as terrible as that phrase sounds.
Bingo
Not even close.
Pic
I liked Cats and I will never apologize for it
/thread
>captcha: DSSNY
I liked it as a kid
>as a kid
first reply, best reply.
this is just what happens when you do everything on a green screen and film everyone separately and try to piece it all together in a computer. It ends up looking like a high school project from a kid who just started learning how to use photoshop.
The Harry Potter movies were pretty fricking ugly. The later films are so desaturated they're practically black and white and they have really weird lighting. It doesn't even really make sense thematically. Even light hearted scenes with friends in a cozy library look like a World War 2 documentary. This is from 2007 but it looks like a PS2 game. There's nothing realistic about this lighting.
Yates has the most dull fricking vision of these films, I can't believe he wound up doing like seven films in that franchise
>The later films are so desaturated they're practically black and white
And you don’t think that’s an intentional reflection of the plot development?
CGI killed Burton. If his modern films stuck with a majority of stop-motion effects it'd feel right at home
Monster house is pretty offensive
A shame as it's actually a good film
It's ugly, dark, and gives you anxiety. The exact opposite of what a Christmas movie is supposed to be... and it doesn't even get the excuse of being a "parody" or quirky film.
>Im one of the morons that actually like this uncanny cg movies. They just tickle me the right way.
>t. hates humanity, probably wishes he were israeli
>What happened to you Burton?
He became rich and started getting laid. Literally never have sex if you don't want Helena Bonham Carter to steal your soul.
Monster House isn't a Christmas movie it's a spooky kids movie.
meant for OP but you probably figured that out
No, not really, since you replied to someone talking about Monster House.
I get that you're a zoomer and you think this is what trolling is, but it's not. It's just you being moronic on purpose and me feeding you (You)s because you thrive on negative attention.
Anon, you replied to a post about Monster House with chatter about Christmas movies. You made the error so I don't know why you're acting like others are in the wrong.
Yeah, no. I get it. You think if you're super subtle and coy and you can get this troll past my defenses. The thing is, you can't. And the reason you can't is because you're a zoomer and it's not a good troll. It's just you pretending to be moronic on purpose. So, take these (You)s and the advice and ponder what kind of anon you want to be going forward.
You're moronic.
Monster House isn't a Christmas movie...
I don't agree, the movie has a lot of Christian parallels in its examination of belief. To me, it is definitely one of the most Christian Christmas films of the modern era.
>I don't agree, the movie has a lot of Christian parallels in its examination of belief.
Because you're a cuck. If you have to think about it, you missed the point. Critiquing a Christmas movie and doing the whole "ackshully when you think about it" is pointless when the visuals are the problem. Film is a visual medium. The movie is visually ugly and uncomfy in its aesthetic. The exact opposite of what you want in a Christmas movie.
> it is definitely one of the most Christian Christmas films of the modern era.
Holidays are celebrated on a cultural level, not a universal one. Christianity is a universal religion. So, Christianity can (and should) inform a Christian film but that film should still represent a culture. What culture does this represent? Ugly israeli trans-humanist golem-puppet robots wearing human skin? It's vile and it most certainly isn't Christian.
Everyone with any honesty looks at that film and rightly concludes "oh, they replaced the white girl in this situation with a white-acting black girl" because a black Christmas film would not be Polar Express. Black people have their own things, and that's perfectly ok. They don't even sing the same song for childrens birthdays. It's fine. But the number of white-acting black people who practice white culture and identify with it are so tiny that it makes this sort of "race blind" casting more a performative stunt than a virtue. It was probably done to satisfy diversity mandates and not spite but that doesn't change the fact that no one with a soul and a functioning immune system really wants to celebrate multicultural holidays.
based
The cucked mind at work
Checked and based
>They don't even sing the same song for childrens birthdays
qrd please. my sides are prepared.
Black folks think "Happy Birthday to You" is too corny and uptight. Can't dance and whoop to it. They sing the chorus to the Stevie Wonder song "Happy Birthday to Ya". Not even making that up.
Nah I've jerk offd way too much to that girl
Nice
He's talking about the house
>the upskirt scene
kino
post it
I vividly remember a dream I had when I was like 14, we were in a different monster house and spent half the dream making out and talking and the other half fighting little house goblins. No idea why I remember that, I didn't get obsessed with her character or the movie or anything. Never dreamed her again. I don't even remember the details of the dream. I just have this incredibly powerful gist that will never go away.
Tl;Dr Jenny a cute
It's fine for its era. There's far worse. And yeah, Jenny a cute!
The art direction is great, the CG has just aged like milk. Even the first Incredibles looks stone age by today's standards.
Bobs Burgers
Im one of the morons that actually like this uncanny cg movies. They just tickle me the right way.
I enjoy it also. They have a sort of surreal feeling to them
Seeing Red
Some of the Narnia movies and the golden compass movie have some gnar shots in otherwise decent looking movies
toy story 1 had better cgi than crystal skull
Seeing a Spielberg film go all Prequels greenscreen shit like Lucas's dreck was painful, if there was one thing to say about Spielberg's films it was that they were always technically superior compared to the average Hollywood film
I just want to know why. He's one of the biggest names in the entire industry, he can budget whatever he wants, he has countless connections and worked with so many amazing set and effects artists. He could have made a real movie. So why did he blow out this travesty?
Given he's made great looking films since then, I just have to assume Lucas got in his ear about doing more computer shit like he did with the PT. There's still plenty of practical stuff in the film, but mostly in the first act, as soon as they go to the jungle it turns to absolute shit visually and never recovers.
The over the topness of Crystal Skull in the second half feels more Pirates of the Caribbean than Indiana Jones. Indy was fanciful but not THAT cartoony.
Because the visual effects industry has become 99% digital and most digital shit gets outsourced to pajeets in Bangalore
Next time you see a Marvel or big budget special effects heavy movie, look at how many Bishnu Shamalamams are there in the credits under VFX artists
>tfw you will never spend hours rehearsing swordfight moves with Cate Blanchett while she gets all hot and exhausted
indiana jones and the crystal skull was the first movie i ever saw on bluray. i remember thinking it was so crazy that bluray videos had such high video quality that you could actual make out the special effects. big lol
How is that gun supposed to be operated?
yes
Turning Red
It triggers a whole new cringe reflex
fyi the reason they all so ugly is because they did use motion capture to get the actors movements but they couldn't replicate the eyes so all the eyes were done from scratch which is why they look "off"
The Hobbit 3
What the hell happened? The first two parts had lots of bad effects and overdone lighting, but this third film had this smeared grey bloom filter over every scene and 90% of any shot seemed to be crappy CG
>Lotr
>So they probably have to repeat the same guy 1000 times on screen but it still looks like a real army of guys, so crazy!
>Hobbit
>You literally spammed the same one guy 1000 times, so lazy!
I have no idea if you're attempting to complain or not
I'm saying LOTR uses tricks that even when looked for can't be easily figured out, the Hobbit uses the same tricks so poorly that it looks cheap
Actually, LotR looks way better because they usually had real scenery shots superimposed with subtle CGI, or even used "bigatures" which were real sets scaled down.
It was at a time where CGI was still in its infancy so they knew they had to resort to more practical solutions, otherwise it would look like garbage like the SW prequels.
Nowadays, producers just goes full CGI for some moronic reason, probably to reduce budget and effort
>reduce budget
CG is expensive
then why the frick do they do that when it's inferior?
Because it allows them to change details later on. I suspect that an efficient director that can work around studio meddling, like David Lean, would make cheaper movies without CGI than with.
It's much cheaper than practical, are you insane?
No it isn't
Oh okay. So it takes more money to render a CGI image of a castle than hire skilled artists to spend weeks or months creating a matte paintin? Damn I didn't know that I guess that fantasy movie me and my friends made for $200 with custom CGI effects would have been even cheaper if we had spent more time and money testing and making practical effects. Mind = blown
Professional CGI is different from you using a couple of Movie Maker effects in your hobby project.
Not after you have a library of assets you can recycle ad infinitum.
Holy frick, I wish I didn't zoom in on the faces. How did this get approved?
Because they were pressed for time. The film was due in December and they had another 1000 VFX shots still needing to be done
ARR ROOK SAME
And the copypasted troops are not the most offensive thing to me here, it's that ugly grey bloom over everything, like they doused the lens in vaseline
Like look at this shit, why is it so blown out?
Cause I started fricking it
really pathetic how Peter Jackson, Burton and Spielberg just stopped caring about art direction over the years.
I cut jackson a bit of a break because he never even wanted to make the hobbit films to begin with and when he did agree to it it was meant to only be two movies. So by the end he was probably being rushed and just couldn't be fricked anymore. Its sad though I would have liked to seen what guillermo del toro's Hobbit would have been like.
Spielberg got his shit back together eventually after that 2000s period, at least. Jackson has pretty much retired from feature films, only doing documentaries, and Burton seems on autopilot.
Spielberg's problem is that he started working with Janusz "Soft Focus + More Mood Lighting = Gooder" Kaminski.
This is probably the winner. The third Hobbit movie feels like the first movie completely generated by a computer. Nothing looks real, nothing is composited well, none of the action makes sense, and every line of dialogue seems designed by a committee of robots. I saw it in the theater and it was an assault on the senses.
/thread
nearly impossible to beat this one, it takes every CGI stereotype and abuses it to absurd lenghts
Wheres the black elves?
I'd be worried about finding a second elf among that lot.
>What the hell happened?
zero preparation
Your sex tape
hobbit movies are ugly as frick. Also, Last Jedi is very ugly and tasteless. Which is kinda funny considering how good Knives Out looks.
>how good Knives Out looks
Wut. It looks like every other movie.
That's not even a shot from the film
It's clearly from a deleted scene then because it looks exactly the same.
Spawn
90's kino
shitkino
DIPPÉ RULES
Some bad cgi doesnt make the whole movie ugly, the practical stuff was decent atleast.
>Polar Express, Shrek 2, Incredibles, Shark Tale
none of the 2004 CG films were very visually appealing
Shark Tale wasn't made by the folks behind Antz, Shrek and Madagascar tho. It was a different branch at another city
i love Shark Tale so much
better than the puerile, cynical, art destroying, postmodern crap that was Shrek 2 earlier that year
Son of the Mask
>being filtered this hard
Yes, that is a black and white filter
which one has the most Black folk in it
>shitting on Zulu
Look at this pleb trying to fit in
Foodfight!
This one.
you're fricking gay if you wouldn't
A Bug's Life
That scene is moronic but it's just going for the unnecessary dutch angle shaky cam MTV "aesthetic". The CGI cats just doing normal cat stuff or the scenes where Catwoman herself is CGI are much worse. The dialogue scenes are set like a bad soap opera.
And the worst thing is it's way less ugly than Vidocq, the director's previous movie, which should be a strong contender if it wasn't so irrelevant imo. Funnily enough it's the 1st movie shot entirely on digital.
Forgot pic
Cool FMV game bro
Hey, OP said ugliest movie not scene. The whole film looks like trash.
I'm just saying this scene gets all the hate and it's not very fair. And again not even the ugliest movie from that director.
Sweet Christmas
It's like Zack Snyder trying to do Sam Raimi
Cats
what the frick was Zach thinking with the shallow depth of field in this movie? is it really just to hide bad effects?
Turns out he can't DP for shit
Without Larry there, the moron was unleashed
Justice League 2017.
Made me laugh out loud
There's a good pick. Not one frame of that film looked real.
the frick is he doing? was this filmed in reverse?
>We were forced to become what you drove through today, a burnt-out coal field, and the biggest icebox graveyard east of the Ohio foundry belt.
And that's why I NEVER let a Banker go!
How about a financial publisher?
When you're reeve you can run things the way you like.
The version of A Christmas Carol with Jim Carrey is exceptionally heinous.
Latest spiderman.
Sky Captain
Tekkonkinkreet is really ugly in an endearing way.
In the same vein Triplets of Belleville.
Martyrs
Any overly green-screened movie like Bohemian Rhapsody. Always looks cheap and plastic.
When did it all go wrong for Disney
i can't fricking stand florence pugh. her head and torso are so stocky, it makes her face look too small. shockingly bad proportions for any woman who isn't from a pacific island.
That CGI abomination movie Delgeo (sp?) or whatever and Foodfight were pretty bad. It's hilarious that picrel was made by Disney and had a budget too. Oh no wait OP is Polar Express? I thought it was Mars Needs Moms
>Danny, we need to do the CGI for our movie!
>You have a copy of The Sims 3, Right?
Who is this semensaurus?
Yeah this fricking thing. Who the frick thought this would make a great movie for kids other than lizard frickers obviously
Budget: $40 million
Box office: $694,782
All CGI films will age badly going by this thread. Even Toy Story, Cars and Monster Inc look like shit
Where the dead go to die:
It's the most disturbing and ugliest piece of cinema i've ever witnessed
It's still oddly better than Foodfight even if it's literally Mr. Pickles made by a psycho (on purpose not for comedy)
Wow you made me remember that movie. I forgot all about it for a long time.
the dog-mom scene is forever burned into my mind
The eye scene messed me up the most.
Movies with all black casts
Everyone in this thread citing Tim Burton's films is moronic. They're that way on purpose so shouldn't count. With the exception of maybe Batman '89, they're basically horror films with a light or comedic tone. OP should have specified UNIRONICALLY ugliest movies, but still.
Well that's a pile of utter horseshit, because Burton's films in the 80s and 90s were beautiful. Gothic and grim and all that, but beautiful.
Alice in Wonderland is just hideous, a brown filter slapped over everything and ugly greenscreening in every scene, nothing looks convincing.
Never said they weren't beautiful so not sure who you're arguing with.
Well his many very beautiful films haven't been called ugly here so I can't say I know who you're arguing with either. No one said Ed Wood, or Sleepy Hollow or Batman Returns are ugly.
Again, you're mad at Tim Burton for doing bad Tim Burton. You don't actually think Alice is "ugly" because you love his brand of ugly. You just weren't visually entertained by that one.
the only Burton film being cited is the Alice film from 2010, are you claiming that's a horror film or that being a horror film gives you license to make a shitty looking film?
I'm claiming you're mad at Tim Burton for doing Tim Burton badly and trying to slip that seethe into a thread about ugly films. Tim Burton is being moronic on purpose, good or bad. It doesn't count.
This film looks like absolutely dogshit. I don't care who made it, or when. The end result is horrible, and not in some ironic artistic way, it's just crap. Even the composition sucks in the film, usually a strong suit of his, never mind the greenscreen everything and brown filter.
I don't know why you think I'm "seething" at Tim Burton. I like Tim Burton, or at least his output up to the 2000s where it became hit or miss with more misses.
>I don't know why you think I'm "seething" at Tim Burton.
Because you clearly are. You went back to the holodeck but this time Minuette didn't quite have the charm and attraction. Something had changed. But instead of accepting that the Binars were shit to begin with and Minuette was always fake you go into holodeck simulation threads and seethe.
If Tim Burton wasn't a hack weirdo to begin with then he'd still be making beautiful films because beauty is timeless. But he was a a product of his time who got old, got rich, had sex, and that's what you're mad about. You don't want to believe that your le quirky dark gothic aesthetic is more than just gay homosexualry. You want to believe it was real, damnit! It's not.
So repent of your sodomy and learn to into actual beauty and stop shitting up threads about beauty with getting mad at ugly-merchants who stop selling your preferred brand of ugly.
Holy shit what the actual frick is this schizo going on about?
looks like a shcizo /trek/ poster that got out of his containment thread. Apparently he's having difficulty reconciling Burton's steady decline starting with the Apes remake.
No one cares about your seething over a general
frick them honestly kek, some of the worst posters on this board. especially the lower decks schizo
Jesus fricking Christ you can't just keep using "unironically" for everything, get a damn vocabulary.
>Jesus fricking Christ
>get a damn vocabulary.
check out this wordsmith.
Mirrormask is up there. Which is a shame because it's inventive and I feel like if it had 50% more budget it might have been kino. As it stands it comprises of some terrible early 90s looking greenscreen/cgi despite being made in 2005.
sounds kino
that reminds me of the Casshern and Sky Captain and the World of Tomorrow. Those early "all green screen" movies when the technology just wasn't there.
This is at least as "real" as a marvel movie, but it looks better.
I would love to know what makes some movies just look like shit. I rewatched the 2000s scooby doo ones recently, and despite the terrible CGI and generally cheap look of a lot of stuff both of them pop out visually and are really appealing to look at
Alien vs Predator: Requiem
Almost the entire film has this extremely dark look to it too, only the daytime scenes avoid it, and even those have a tendency to look too dark to feel like daytime, it isn't a problem with the rip or whatever it really is just this ugly.
It's too bad it's so ugly, because Polar Express is otherwise top Christmas kino.
Final Fantasy Spirits Within is the ugliest thing I've ever seen
Pretty ugly, right up there with galarians tbh but not the ugliest.
the deathrace sequel. not the jason statham one
.
what's this from?
CGI remake of Yellow Submarine that was canned, in pre-production by robert zemeckis who made Polar Express, canned around 2010
>canned
Thank heavens
man zemeckis really shit the bed after who framed roger rabbit
>pre-production
So, basically nothing but some ideas and maybe concept art.
The Hobbit: The Battle of the Five Armies
The Garbage Pail Kids Movie. And I don't care if it's meant to be ugly, because it's physically painful to watch and it doesn't help that it's one of the worst movies ever made.
AOTC is up there
This looks utterly impeccable though
No, it looks like Christopher Lee on a crappy greenscreen
Literally every modern American movie is unwatchable because of the ugly obese mystery meat cast. Entire Hollywood is the extended Gummo cinematic universe nowadays
I think D&D is gay, but I remember reading about the mongrelfolk and slowly realizing that this is the perfect representation of modern Americans. I bet they've had to be retconned and memoryholed.
Also,
Seethe.
>Literally every modern American movie is unwatchable because of the ugly obese mystery meat cast.
Imagine coming to Cinemaphile to be mad at Americans on a daily basis
Literally came here for the first time in several months. This place gets dumber every time. Probably won't come back for another half a year.
Whatever you say, seething globopleb.
I remember when AotC came out I was like 21 and everybody I know goofed on it. All I remember about that movie is the jokes because it sucked. And this was before being angry at movies was a popular thing. We thought The Matrix was going to be our generation's Star Wars so we were pretty smug about it. In retrospect, I wish I'd have been more humble and kinder to George instead of putting my faith in literal trannies. But, it was the early 00's and I was young.
The film sucks dick
Yeah I suppose it does but if you put a gun to my head and said watch AotC until you die or Rise of Skywalker I'd probably go witn the prequels. Star wars is dead regardless
Wow, two crap films. What a choice.
Digital killed movies
Lawnmower man
dude, brown and grey, lol
Arcane
That's not a movie, champ.
Disney Pixar movies recently
Stars Wars Prequels, TCW movie.
It suffers from a limited color palate and some bland designs, but it's definitely not "ugly".
this. it's one of the most beautifully shot sci fi movies. the aesthetics are on point, and the closest you'll ever get to a decent DUNE adaptation.
It is. It's an "epic" movie with NOTHING to look at.
Overhyped but not ugly
the comedian. tim heidecker. he obviously made this movie intentionally bad because he's 2deep4me. but i can't believe i watched this. it was as bad as a student film project. everything about it was just a bore and bland to look at. maybe it's not the ugliest. but i really felt disgusted after watching this.
Lol comedians are frauds and fricking losers
That's kind of the point, isn't it.
The banality of millennial nihilists.
There is a very small gap, like a mini-generation, between the last of the Gen-Xers with their cool, detached, underachiever slacker ethos and the dawning of the SJW terminally-online bugperson that was ushered in by Obama. Probably less than a decade but it is definitely a distinct cohort of individuals completely caught between pre- and post- social media.
Any kubrick movie
You guys ever get car sick? That cold sweat, nausea, throbbing headache car sick? This is what this movie made me feel like.
Gummo
>using the term "pic related" in an infographic
Slapstick of Another Kind
What the frick happened with Straczynski after Babylon 5 ended? Did he remove his brain? Crusade fricking suuuuuuuucked.
The network pulled the plug before the first episode even aired. It never had a chance.
>Actually sweaty, the Son of God was ugly!!!
Kill them all
god only loves superficially beautiful things? i guess you're going to hell then lmao
that's racist
Traffic
I bet realistic fake live action could be pulled off better with deepfakes
Lightyear.
The eyes on brown characters in nu-Pixar flicks look too revolting.
i love polar express so much
Alien 3