Why the frick is everybody here so insecure? Everybody is always claiming to be so smart and clever, and always calling everyone else morons, morons, midwits, etc. It's all quite tiring.
>https://www.1337xx.to/torrent/5643867/The-Popes-Exorcist-2023-1080p-WEBRip-x265-R4RBG-TGx/
Why did you download this? The only thing it had going for it was Russell Kincrow and even he failed, unfortunately a sequel has been greenlit.
I didn't watch it so you don't need to worry. I just thought the memes were funny but then I remembered I don't feel like watching anything. I'm quite depressed so I want my days to be as similar as possible because then the days just fly by; That means doing nothing.
>https://www.1337xx.to/torrent/5643867/The-Popes-Exorcist-2023-1080p-WEBRip-x265-R4RBG-TGx/
Why did you download this? The only thing it had going for it was Russell Kincrow and even he failed, unfortunately a sequel has been greenlit.
Whatever you do DO NOT click on these links!!!! Just got a virus!!!
I'm guessing you're trolling because a legitimate answer would be on /wsr/ with people that actually know what they're talking about and not Cinemaphile shitposters looking to fight over anything tv related.
Besides since you're fricking stupid ass didn't define "good quality ones" we can't tell what in the frick quality you're trying to get.
But going off shitty x265 encoding at 1080p, your taste is fricking garbage and if YIFY doesn't have anything you like you're a screeching autist crying for whatever the frick you got addicted to on rarbg because I can tell you right now any 4k Yify release (no need to be a genius and point out that Yify is relatlvely low bitrate shit) is better than whatever 1080p x265 garbage you were watching before.
>x265 1080p kino rips
If you're referring to their -RARBG released rips, they're garbage. They never realized crf encoding is so much better than the ridiculous way they do it giving every single thing the same exact arbitrary bitrate. It's too bad because they were so prolific with 1000's of shitty encodes.
The quality is better. So for those people who a pixel peepers like me or get triggered at over-softened video, x265 sucks because of the way it's designed. It's designed to throw out too much data to make that low bitrate happen and that fricking sucks.
Have you ever compared two rips of the same material, with the same video bit rate? One x264, and one x265? The x265 should look better. The problem with most x265 rips is the guys who make them think the codec is magic and try to use super low bit rates. Of COURSE they don't look so great.
>But it's mainly noticeable at higher resolutions.
That seems odd to me, given that h.265 is the codec 4K BluRays use. Surely, when the bit rates are sufficient, it looks good. I can't imagine they would have settled on that codec otherwise.
The reason they use h.265 for 4k is because it's low bitrate 4k movie. Shit, to put it at x264 it would be much much bigger but look a lot better. But in order to see that quality difference you'd have to like look at it at an EVEN BIGGER screen or blow up the image and shit to start analyzing it.
But at 4k, the resolution is so high that it's good enough no matter what bitrate it uses.
At 1080p the full image is there in your face to analyze easily and it isn't that high anymore.
12 months ago
Anonymous
>The reason they use h.265 for 4k is because it's low bitrate 4k movie.
4K BluRays can have bit rates up to 128Mbps. You consider that "low bit rate"? It's the highest bit rate available with consumer deliverables. Have to get a hold of Digital Cinema Packages to get any better. Those go up to 250Mbps.
12 months ago
Anonymous
Ok, well my point was relatively speaking. I probably will fail at saying what I'm trying to say so I'll give it one more shot and then say frick it.
I'm not "simply" saying 4k blurays are low bitrate and stopping there. I mean, obviously they're high as all frick bitrate compared to Yify or other shit downloaded from the internet, but when if you look at fully uncompressed video, next to a high bitrate 4k bluray, would you still be standing "in awe" at 4k bluray disc quality?
12 months ago
Anonymous
>if you look at fully uncompressed video, next to a high bitrate 4k bluray, would you still be standing "in awe" at 4k bluray disc quality?
Gotcha. Hard to say. Uncompressed video is downright HUGE. Kinda impractical even for use when shooting movies. I know they CAN shoot uncompressed, of course, but I think they often use ARRIRAW codec or some such, because those cards get filled up FAST with uncompressed.
12 months ago
Anonymous
Oops. Nevermind me. ARRIRAW *is* uncompressed. Still, I doubt we ever have a consumer format that offers us uncompressed video. Technology is crazy though, maybe it will happen someday.
New releases you'd probably have to find elsewhere, but rarbg releases are still alive, it's only the tracker that got shot down. You just have find the torrent files or magnet links.
this.
they cant even seem to find the right site that isnt a honeypot like 90% of the time.
like if my moronic ass can do it why are they having so much trouble?
Hey guys OP here, sorry I forgot to ask, is it gay to suck dick? I've sucked over 37 wieners but not in a row so it doesn't count as gay but a friend said I'm a massive homosexual. Am I?
you literally dont need more than 720p
I could tell you but I don't want the sites to be taken down.
As if the copyright buttholes aren't well aware of all the torrent sites.
Why do they have such a hate boner for rarbg reuploads?
I would say "the israelites" but I'm actually creative and interesting so I won't.
you're actually a midwit
You gonna start blaming the israelites now or what?
>he's still virtuesignalling
midwit
>Anyone who doesn't bash on the israelites is a midwit.
>strawmanning
midwit
Are you able to reply with anything else, other than "midwit"?
Yes there's a greentext part in most of my posts too
Why the frick is everybody here so insecure? Everybody is always claiming to be so smart and clever, and always calling everyone else morons, morons, midwits, etc. It's all quite tiring.
woah calm down midwit, why so sensitive
>1337x doesn't have good quality
What the HECK are you talking about? I downloaded from there recently and the file was 1080p x265.
https://www.1337xx.to/torrent/5643867/The-Popes-Exorcist-2023-1080p-WEBRip-x265-R4RBG-TGx/
>https://www.1337xx.to/torrent/5643867/The-Popes-Exorcist-2023-1080p-WEBRip-x265-R4RBG-TGx/
Why did you download this? The only thing it had going for it was Russell Kincrow and even he failed, unfortunately a sequel has been greenlit.
I didn't watch it so you don't need to worry. I just thought the memes were funny but then I remembered I don't feel like watching anything. I'm quite depressed so I want my days to be as similar as possible because then the days just fly by; That means doing nothing.
fed link. it has xx instead of x
Whatever you do DO NOT click on these links!!!! Just got a virus!!!
>x265
>1080p
I'm guessing you're trolling because a legitimate answer would be on /wsr/ with people that actually know what they're talking about and not Cinemaphile shitposters looking to fight over anything tv related.
Besides since you're fricking stupid ass didn't define "good quality ones" we can't tell what in the frick quality you're trying to get.
But going off shitty x265 encoding at 1080p, your taste is fricking garbage and if YIFY doesn't have anything you like you're a screeching autist crying for whatever the frick you got addicted to on rarbg because I can tell you right now any 4k Yify release (no need to be a genius and point out that Yify is relatlvely low bitrate shit) is better than whatever 1080p x265 garbage you were watching before.
>x265 1080p kino rips
If you're referring to their -RARBG released rips, they're garbage. They never realized crf encoding is so much better than the ridiculous way they do it giving every single thing the same exact arbitrary bitrate. It's too bad because they were so prolific with 1000's of shitty encodes.
Why did you write all this shit and not even answer OP's question? Is that how they do shit on Reddit? Tell me after I filter the thread.
why do people even share things that are x264? it's just a waste of data
SERIOUS ANSWER:
The quality is better. So for those people who a pixel peepers like me or get triggered at over-softened video, x265 sucks because of the way it's designed. It's designed to throw out too much data to make that low bitrate happen and that fricking sucks.
Have you ever compared two rips of the same material, with the same video bit rate? One x264, and one x265? The x265 should look better. The problem with most x265 rips is the guys who make them think the codec is magic and try to use super low bit rates. Of COURSE they don't look so great.
Pretty sure I have. Also this would get complicated because resolution and screen size and all other things play a factor.
But it's mainly noticeable at higher resolutions.
>But it's mainly noticeable at higher resolutions.
That seems odd to me, given that h.265 is the codec 4K BluRays use. Surely, when the bit rates are sufficient, it looks good. I can't imagine they would have settled on that codec otherwise.
The reason they use h.265 for 4k is because it's low bitrate 4k movie. Shit, to put it at x264 it would be much much bigger but look a lot better. But in order to see that quality difference you'd have to like look at it at an EVEN BIGGER screen or blow up the image and shit to start analyzing it.
But at 4k, the resolution is so high that it's good enough no matter what bitrate it uses.
At 1080p the full image is there in your face to analyze easily and it isn't that high anymore.
>The reason they use h.265 for 4k is because it's low bitrate 4k movie.
4K BluRays can have bit rates up to 128Mbps. You consider that "low bit rate"? It's the highest bit rate available with consumer deliverables. Have to get a hold of Digital Cinema Packages to get any better. Those go up to 250Mbps.
Ok, well my point was relatively speaking. I probably will fail at saying what I'm trying to say so I'll give it one more shot and then say frick it.
I'm not "simply" saying 4k blurays are low bitrate and stopping there. I mean, obviously they're high as all frick bitrate compared to Yify or other shit downloaded from the internet, but when if you look at fully uncompressed video, next to a high bitrate 4k bluray, would you still be standing "in awe" at 4k bluray disc quality?
>if you look at fully uncompressed video, next to a high bitrate 4k bluray, would you still be standing "in awe" at 4k bluray disc quality?
Gotcha. Hard to say. Uncompressed video is downright HUGE. Kinda impractical even for use when shooting movies. I know they CAN shoot uncompressed, of course, but I think they often use ARRIRAW codec or some such, because those cards get filled up FAST with uncompressed.
Oops. Nevermind me. ARRIRAW *is* uncompressed. Still, I doubt we ever have a consumer format that offers us uncompressed video. Technology is crazy though, maybe it will happen someday.
Why is the audio on torrented movies always so bad?
The dialogue is always too quiet.
Modern movies.
New releases you'd probably have to find elsewhere, but rarbg releases are still alive, it's only the tracker that got shot down. You just have find the torrent files or magnet links.
Tigole.
Don't forget to hide all threads by losers who used some one crappy torrents website and can't find what they want in the current fricking year.
this.
they cant even seem to find the right site that isnt a honeypot like 90% of the time.
like if my moronic ass can do it why are they having so much trouble?
Hey guys OP here, sorry I forgot to ask, is it gay to suck dick? I've sucked over 37 wieners but not in a row so it doesn't count as gay but a friend said I'm a massive homosexual. Am I?
1337 definitely has some good quality.
ncore.cc
For old movies I just ctrl+f through the 200MB .txt file of almost every magnet link from RARBG.