>There are no good third sequels
Prove him wrong.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
>There are no good third sequels
Prove him wrong.
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Thalidomide Vintage Ad Shirt $22.14 |
It's All Fucked Shirt $22.14 |
Nightmare on Elm Street 3
Return of the King
Are the two that pop into my head.
>Return of the King
Decent film on its own. Pretty bad compared to the first two. Same goes with the 2nd.
Contrarian moron.
wtf u mean? the first film is the most acclaimed. don't use words u dont understand
I agree but the quality drop is not too bad. If Fellowship is a 10/10 (it is) Return of the King is like 8/10.
I can’t think of a single redeeming quality of Rotk besides having lotr title slapped on it
>sauronman death scene
>crystal ball moronation
>absolutely terrible Gondor white city battle
>cgi ghost dues ex machina
>”I am no man”
>mouth of Sauron
Just awful compared to the first two
>sauronman death scene
yeah it really was gratuitous. The steward's death is the same where he runs a mile on fire to jump to his death
>crystal ball moronation
What was bad about it? It was how Sauron and Saruman communicated and we see the hobbit and later Aragorn use it to trick Sauron
>absolutely terrible Gondor white city battle
Only bad part is the ghosts and the elephants and the cavalry charge where it's cgi horses running into cgi orcs
>cgi ghost dues ex machina
>”I am no man”
kino line frick you
>mouth of Sauron
great design
I agree that ROTK is the weakest movie of the three but there's definitely good parts. Samwise especially carries the film
Bait, and the flanderisation of the Ringwraiths, frick me. Let’s just glue bits of armour all over the c**ts and that’s what all you get now in the modern games
Frick off
just get the cgi ghost army, wipe out all the orcs and simply walk into mordor
How edgy and contrarian of you
moron
I wouldn't go that far in calling the anon a moron but he's definitely borderline
I don’t think hardcore salty lotr fan boys exist anymore so I’ll just assume you’re baiting
Sorry about your failure of a life hope it improves somewhat
When you're complaining about things that were in the book being the movie you're just complaining because you're a moron
>sauronman dies in the book by falling off a tower onto a wagon wheel
Wow boasting about reading and failing on the first story element brought up
Like I said sorry about your life man, hope you lose that weight and fix your drinking problem
He dies by getting stabbed in the back. Which is what happens. When you're also complaining about the palantir and Eowyn you're just whining to anyone that will listen. It's quite sad.
I agree.
He has an excuse for RotK, he says he views Jackson's trilogy as one sole long ass movie.
LOTR is just one long story that takes 3 movies to finish so it's different.
Bond movies are individual stand alone movies so they dont count. You could argue the Craig movies aren't
Thats like saying LOTR is just 1 big book. Stop being dumb.
Uhhhhhhhhhhh....it is. It's one book.
No it's not. It's six books.
Clown
>LOTR is just one long story that takes 3 movies to finish so it's different
this
it's not a sequel, it's just the end of the story
King Kong vs Godzilla (1962)
Godzilla vs King Ghidorah (1991) (Third Heisei film)
>origin story to crime drama to capeshit
Explains why TDKR is the weakest by a pretty wide margin
Wouldnt a third sequel be the 4th movie?
autism chads, I kneel
Correct. A sequel to a movie is part 2. The second sequel is part 3. The third sequel would be part 4.
Batman Begins is technically not the first Batman film, it's a remake/reimagining
Yeah, but he's talking to a journalist. They're fricking morons.
everybody loves Die Hard 3
Die Hard 3 also switched genres.
that's because everyone wants to pretend die hard 2 never happened
Like Elm Street 2 going into 3.
3rd movies are better when they know they have to step up to save the franchise. Otherwise the quality declines on a steady trend relying on name recognition. Like all current capeshit.
Die Hard 3 feels like the true sequel to the first one. Die Hard 2 is like a DLC.
you right you right
Die Hard 3's only weakness is the ending, otherwise it's 99% kino
>durrrp it should have ended with them playing spin the bottle with a bazooka and no action whatsoever
As much as I liked that alternate ending, I really do prefer the helicopter ending. It fits the tone of Die Hard more.
>Say hello to your brother
obviously LOTR
Umm actually that's technically the second sequel sweetie
Legit this one, you'd be hard pressed to say a Fistful of Dollars or A Few Dollars More are better. Kind of funny this is the only one who didn't ape Kurosawa.
I like Fistful more. Less bullshit at the start.
Which Kurosawa did A few Dollars More rip-off?
Absolutely. But it doesn't count. People wouldn't even realize they are a trilogy if they didn't know beforehand.
end duel was kino and made the story worth it but I prefer a few dollars more
Dollars trilogy also follows the same expansion as TDK triology with an origin a crime drama and a historical epic
Rocky 3
Tokyo Drift
>We didn't know what to do so we tried to put Batman into a Tale of Two Cities.
tokyo drift
>historical epic
do they really
Thread.
/thread
all of these only work because the second film was ass, it's impossible to make a good threequel if the sequel was good
your concession is accepted.
Also, Toy Story 3 since 4 never happened.
Moving goalposts. Post breasts.
Star Trek II, III, and IV are a trilogy and all three are outstanding movies
iv was a letdown. i hate time travel and wales
IV is kino, and you should apologize and sit in a corner until you are old enough to post here.
based
Goyslop trash
Excellent call anon.
Temple of Doom was a prequel so this is technically only the first sequel.
KINO! KINO! KINO!
it's a 3/10 movie with 2/10 predecessors
That's the 6th sequel moron
>it literally says 3 on the poster, can you not read roman numerals?
>younglings
fricking prequelgays never give up
I appreciate a lot of what TDKR tries to do on a thematic level even if much of the movie is extremely clunky.
The third James Bond film was Goldfinger, which if not one of the best is at least one of the most influential.
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade, excellent movie.
Final Destination 3, probably my favourite of the series.
The Bourne Ultimatum. Get some rest, Nolan. You look tired.
>There are no good third sequels
>Immediately invalidates that claim by mentioning Rocky 3
Nice to see one of the goats recognized
Exorcist III
/Thread
Doesn't really count. It was originally meant to be called Legion and was going to have little to nothing to do with Exorcist but studio meddling insisted it be called Exorcist III and that it have more direct references for marketing reasons. They even totally reshot the ending so that the movie would have an actual exorcism in it.
Also, Exorcist II is horrible, so it doesn't really count for that reason.
>The second one is a crime drama very much like Heat
I unironically love TDKR. Most of the normie complaints about it are stupid.
Bit like driving around a bomb and sending EVERY cop into the seeers? That kind of stupid?
I wonder how many of the people who criticize the Nolan films for this kind of nitpickery will simultaneously defend the Burton films even though they have penguins shooting rocket launchers
I like both the Nolan and the Burton films, so I couldn't really tell you.
They didn't send every cop into the sewers. The average major metropolitan city has roughly 50,000 police officers. Did that look like 50,000 cops to you? It was like a thousand at best. There were a bunch elsewhere in the city who were hunted down and killed over the several months that the siege went on. There is also a faction that survives both the tunnel cave-in and the culling that happens throughout the rest of the city, including primary characters Gordon and Blake as well as supporting ones like Foley. It's not just those three guys. You can see other officers in those scenes.
As for the bomb thing, I happen to think it's pretty ingenious to keep the thing mobile so that it's harder to target. It's going to completely destroy the city no matter where it is, so it's not like it's any more or less dangerous to do so, and there's no indication that it's the sort of device that could explode if it gets jostled around. It's not like it's filled with nitroglycerin.
>But UUUMMMMM like, how did Bruce Wayne, like, get back inside Gotham city? Plot hole plot hole plot hole!
Thor Ragnarok
no
oh, so you like the first 2 more then?
Edwards vs Usman 3 was good
saw 3
Army of the Dead
rocky 3 was better than 2 or 4 and 5
that isn't true. they may not but as good as their predecessors but that doesn't mean they're bad, in some cases they're better like Revenge of the Sith.
But anon, that movie is terrible
Rocky III is the best Rocky and Return of the Jedi is the best Star Wars.
key note
Also Spiderman:NWH is the best MCU spiderman. Infinity War is also the best Avengers movie. Also Fury Road is best Mad Max.
>Cinemaphile worships this movie unironically
that's better actually
>so you came back to die for your city
>n-no uuuh... I came back for you
what the frick do you respond to that? it's worse than the ornella incident.
I don't think anyone genuinely likes The Dark Knight Rises, we've always just laughed at how bad it is. It's poorly made and ridiculous even by Nolan standards
Could have been improved so much by just editing out like 40 mins. That motherfricker drags so fricking hard. It was always going to be the worst of the trilogy, but it didn't have to be unenjoyable.
Speak for yourself, I think it's great. I don't see how it's any more flawed than the other two.
I unironically like it more than TDK
I genuinely like The Dark Knight Rises. The Dark Knight, OTOH, sucks major ass.
newbies missed the initial irony
Jesus Christ those fake punches to the left of Bane are awful
That's because that's not where your attention is supposed to be. Watch any film with that many stuntmen in the background and you're going to see some immersion breaking shit if you focus on them. It's not like they can choreograph every single skirmish in a setpiece of that size and magnitude. They're stuntmen at best, unpaid extras at worst, and they were asked to improvise so that's what you get. There really isn't any other way to do it.
Why would you even bother scanning the corners of the screen looking for out of focus extras doing silly things unless you either have some kind of vendetta or you're really, really bored? I don't get it.
>why would you even...
Because he's an autist in Cinemaphile
>Why would you even bother scanning the corners of the screen looking for out of focus extras doing silly things
I'm autistic
It sucked, I only watch it for Bane, plane scene, and that kick ass camera work at the end
Whistling in Brooklyn (1943). Not as good as the second film, but it's still very entertaining.
Well he already said Rocky 3 but
>Army of Darkness
>Last Crusade
>Beyond Thunderdome
I liked Beyond Thunderdome but it was cheesy as hell and does not stand up to Road Warrior
Planet of the apes trilogy
Back to the future trilogy
>There are no good third sequels
>Prove him wrong
Army of darkness
that battle sequence
>cops running
could've made more sense if they made it explicit it was a selfless sacrifice
>win by numbers because you had not enough guns, just bum rushing mercs shooting at you with machineguns
would be in tone with the movie, Bane's antithesis, just like Batman, showing Gotham is not rotten
Army of Darkness is the best one
Home Alone 3 is good though.
Army of Darkness, the third Evil Dead movie.
Pretty much a perfect example of Nolan being right, tho. That movie blows.
SCARY MOVIE 3
Death Wish 3
Goldfinger was the third Bond movie and one of the best movies ever made
Also:
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home (the third sequel to TWOK and part of a trilogy)
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Back to the Future Part 3
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
King Kong vs. Godzilla (1962)
Return of the Jedi
Revenge of the Sith
The Dark Knight Rises
Batman Forever
The Return of the Pink Panther
Several other examples
You put a few bad movies in there, but I'll stand with you on Back to the Future 3. People are way too hard on that one.
It’s dog shit and the worst of the series mate.
The least good doesn't mean it's dogshit
Much less bloated and convoluted than 2. It could do without the love story and stupid time travelling train at the end, but as a kid friendly tribute to Westerns, with the time traveling shenanigans thrown in, it worked well.
>Pusher 3
>Elm Street 3
>Halloween 3
>Basket Case 3
>Playtime (3rd Mr. Hulot film)
I also personally feel Return of the Living Dead Part 3, Beyond ReAnimator and Friday the 13th Part 3 earn a passing grade.
Oh, and how could I forget Army of Darkness and The Good, the Bad and the Ugly?
Yeah return of the living dead 3 is ten times better than part 2.
The first three friday and nightmare films are golden, i love them.
Surely he means second sequel?
>We didn’t have a choice. The stakes always have to be bigger than the last movie in sequels.
No they don’t l, especially not for a Batman movie you stupid hack. A low scale hush story could’ve been kino rather then the tripe you delivered Nolan
Yeah that blaming the audience shit is moronic. I could even forgive him for thinking the 3rd movie simply needs to be "biggerer and betterer" but the film's worst crime was that it undoes positive ending of TDK retroactively allowing the joker to win.
What difference does it make if Batman stops the big boom from going off if Gotham has already destroyed itself from the inside like Joker said they would?
>What difference does it make if Batman stops the big boom from going off if Gotham has already destroyed itself from the inside like Joker said they would?
because like batman they can also rise up and pbbbbbbbbbbbt
Kek but they didn't. Joker said they'd turn on each other if you destroyed their spirit by taking down Dent. Batman framed himself for multiple murders to avoid that happening.
Then TDKR undoes all that, reveals the truth (which nobody would believe but ignore that) and Gotham eats itself alive just like Joker said it would
I always thought that after the impact of Joker on Bruce, a movie with Riddler+Strange fricking up his mind would have been perfect as a Nolan movie.
Why did he knowingly made a bad movie, then? Is he some kind of piece of shit?
Barnies Adventure in Make-Believe Land 3
Back to the Future 3
Kung Fu Panda 3
How to Train Your Dragon: The Hidden World
Toy Story 3
Ice Age: Dawn of the Dinosaurs
Cars 3
Back to the Future Part III
The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King
Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi
Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith
Indiana Jones and the Last Crusade
Spider-Man 3
Spider-Man: No Way Home
A Nightmare on Elm Street 3: Dream Warriors
Die Hard with a Vengeance
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
War for the Planet of the Apes
Army of Darkness
The Bourne Ultimatum
Star Trek IV: The Voyage Home
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End
Star Trek Beyond
Austin Powers in Goldmember
The Dark Knight Rises
Rocky III
Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome
Gamera 3: Revenge of Iris
Jurassic Park ///
The Godfather Coda: The Death of Michael Corleone
National Lampoon's Christmas Vacation
Halloweentown High
Men in Black 3
Day of the Dead (1985)
Rises was terrible
Spider-Man 3 was horrendous.
No Way Home was garbage
Dream Warriors was schlock.
Good, Bad & Ugly wasn't a sequel, they were different characters in each movie.
Star Trek Beyond was shit, like all Abrams Trek.
Jurassic Park 3... really homie?
Rush Hour 3
This.
He proved himself wrong with TDKR
NOLAN IS A HACK AND A FRAUD
Easily the weakest of the three.
I don't think Zack Snyder's Justice League is as good as Man of Steel of Batman v Superman. But as a third in the trilogy it's absolutely amazing.
>in b4 good morning sirs
army of darkness
Rises sucked.
Return of the King was perfect.
Back to the Future 3 was great, some would argue better than 2.
Return of the Living Dead 3 is my favorite in the series.
Return of the Jedi is perfectly fine.
Army of Darkness is fantastic.
Captain America: Civil War didn't suck.
The third Pirates of the Cerribbean was fine.
>Back to the Future 3 was great, some would argue better than 2
No one ever argues that.
I have heard several people argue that the western setting was a nice change of pace and nearly tied the trilogy together as well as giving Doc a nice ending.
He wasn't big enough
Frick you. I liked it.
I liked this movie too. I just thought Split was okay. Unbreakable is fricking great.
I liked it but I also wish some of the fake leaks like Kevin being able to transfer The Beast into other people had actually happened
John wick parabellum
Halo 3
Harry Potter and the prisoner of Azkaban
Transformers dark of the moon
Species 3
Wallace and Gromit: a close shave
The Matrix Revolutions
>Transformers dark of the moon
>The Matrix Revolutions
get a load of this idiot