Which on-screen Batman and Superman are the best, outfit-wise?
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
Which on-screen Batman and Superman are the best, outfit-wise?
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
DMT Has Friends For Me Shirt $21.68 |
>Batman
Keaton and Batfleck take it. They're the least janky looking and actually feel like comic book characters brought to life. They look the most like "Batman". That said, I do like the tacticool shit on Bale.
>Superman
Christopher Reeve far and away. The best version of the classic suit. As Gunn said, no frills. He wears it with the most confidence too.
Batmin should not look like a pitbull
Everything here is correct except you through in Batfleck for some godforsaken reason.
As much as I don't like the actual take on the character, visually he's straight off the page. Which is what the thread is about.
As far as I'm concerned West, Bale and Keaton are the only live action Batmans who matter. The rest were in shitty movies. Batfleck probably could've worked under better direction and with a better story. His own Batman would've been probably a lot better than the Pattinson shit. I appreciate the 3 for different reasons. My Batman is Bale, but I think Keaton is probably the best. West kind of owns it like Connery owns Bond.
Christopher Reeve as Superman remains untouched. As much as people will always want to dethrone him, they only prove it by returning to him for a point of comparison. He's the definitive Superman.
But also this thread was about the costumes.
>, visually he's straight off the page.
Not really. He's too bloated. Only good thing about him is the costume texture. That's it
>Not really. He's too bloated.
He actually looks sleeker than the comic that it's based off.
That's a grotesque caricature and Affleck looks like an overweight dude inside a muscle suit too small for him. In the overrated warehouse murderspree he looks like a gorilla
It's from one of the most iconic comics ever made.
Yeah, I've read it, like most people. The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy therefore when you compare to a person yo uare actually saying that that person is a bloated mess, not that he's le accurate.
Also please don't compare snydershit to Miller
Pattinson copers are so pathetic. This is not a bloated mess.
Outside he explodes the guys in the cars shooting at him, but inside the warehouse he only kills the Russian.
Not a fan of Patterson, sorry to disappoint
>he only kills half the guys when hes' not killing all the other guys
Ok
You called the warehouse scene, in which he kills one guy, a "murderspree." Besides, it's time to grow out of "Batman NEVER le kills." Snyder was right.
Hey ma look!
Magic abs!
They appear on close ups and disappear in wide shots!
>The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy
As opposed to most comicbook artists.
> not that he's le accurate
The other anon claimed it's ripped straight from comics and they're right. Comichomosexuals like you like to play fast and loose with what counts and doesn't count as comic accuracy to suit your narrative. You should've just said the art in the comic is shit in the first place instead of denying it. Let me jog your memory.
>>, visually he's straight off the page.
>Not really.
>>The artist doesn't even know basic anatomy
>As opposed to most comicbook artists.
Yes. Most of them exaggerate fetures, give character unrealistic heroic features. Their style have structure.
>> not that he's le accurate
>The other a...
>>>, visually he's straight off the page.
>>Not really.
Becasue he's not stright form the comics. You are trying to justify bad live action design comparing it to a badly drawn blob.
Here's a "better" drawn big Batman. Stop coping.
You posted a great Batman image, and he looks nothing like the gorilla in the movie.
Thanks for agreeing at last
>Most of them exaggerate fetures, give character unrealistic heroic features.
That more often than not look ridiculous.
> You are trying to justify bad live action design comparing it to a badly drawn blob.
I gave you multiple panels where TDKR Batman looks less sleek than Batfleck. So it's not just one blob. Just admit it's comic accurate but the comic it's using as a source has bad art. Just say it, we'll end the discussion here.
"Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.
How is he like Clooney at all? Clooney was actually a decent Bruce Wayne, but nowhere near as good as fleck.
>"Murderspree" lol. He lets two guys die by their own grenade and kills just one guy.
And torches the main goon. And nukes everyone outside.
>How is he like Clooney at all?
Becasue he's ridiculous. At least Clooney was in a comedy movie
Yeah, sure. I wouldn't call Batfleck ridiculous when Pattinson is like this.
Damn he looks cool.
>There's only one definition!
Alright bud. Sure.
>It's not even Batman specific-
You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
Or do I think I was referring to "no u" still?
Oh. You did.
Poor reading comprehension friend.
>I totally believe you
Good. See, you know I'm right. Look how much we've agreed on!
>Are they in the room?
No. I don't see their writing style here.
>Alright bud. Sure.
Glad, we agree.
> You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
Hello, ESL pajeet. That's not what that passage means. Read this again, especially the first sentence.
> People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newbie.
> No. I don't see their writing style here.
Thanks for confirming you're a schizo.
>Glad we agree
Me too.
>That's not what the passage was-
I know. I said what it was about.
Now I'm concerned. No more jokes.
Can you actually not read?
>Thanks for confirming you're a schizo-
Concession accepted, again.
Are we done?
>Me too
Good. Take your meds now.
> I know. I said what it was about.
You didn't. I'll give you one more opportunity to read it again and tell me what it means. Hint: It isn't saying there are no Batman specific threads.
> Concession accepted, again.
Are you talk to your imaginary friends again?
>Take your meds
Damn. Talk about cliche.
>You didn't.
I did.
In fact, I REALLY did.
And since you can't find it, I'm now convinced you cannot in fact read.
>Talking to imaginary-
No. I'm talking to you.
moron.
>Damn. Talk about cliche.
But true nonetheless. You need to take your meds.
> I did.
Then why didn't you understand it pajeet? I said (and it's very clear) that anons accuse each other of committing "n-no u" retorts all the time and not just in Batman specific threads. Yet, in your ESL brain it got mangled into "no batman specific threads". HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Literal, pajeet tier reading comprehension. And btw, here's an example anons doing it. Took me less than a minute.
I did.
https://archive.4plebs.org/tv/thread/185291581/#q185303841
> No. I'm talking to you.
Well, I never said anything about conceding. It's fair to assume you probably imagined it.
>But true
Midwits confuse truth with lies.
I'll help you get back on track.
It luckily is not true.
>Then why didn't you-
Look I say
>Did you think I was still referring to "no u"
So, I did in fact know what I was referring to. And that it wasn't about Batman threads.
Your moronation didn't allow you to see this.
>HAHAHAHAHA
Damn. Take some meds.
Anyway, I know this kind of posting.
You're mad. Ooh you're angry.
Perturbed fingers desperate for a "gotcha" typed those words.
I'm in your head now.
There isn't much in here though.
>Well I never said anything about-
Never said you did.
Your arguments give it away.
No one who believes they're winning seethes as much as you.
You're my monkey.
You do as I say.
Reply to me monkey.
Reply again.
>Midwits confuse truth with lies.
You're a dimwit schizo who's out of touch with reality.
> So, I did in fact know what I was referring to. And that it wasn't about Batman threads.
Is English really that hard pajeet? The point is simple.
1) N-no u has being pointed out in multiple threads. It's common in Cinemaphile. Not just Batman specific threads.
2) You can look into those instances to see its actual definition.
Being the ESL pajeet you're, you failed at this simple task. That I was able to do im under a minute. Sad. All because you couldn't read one(1) sentence properly.
>Damn. Take some meds.
>Anyway, I know this kind of posting.
>You're mad. Ooh you're angry.
>Perturbed fingers desperate for a >"gotcha" typed those words.
>I'm in your head now.
>There isn't much in here though.
>Never said you did.
>Your arguments give it away.
>No one who believes they're winning >seethes as much as you.
>You're my monkey.
>You do as I say.
>Reply to me monkey.
>Reply again.
LMAO, Not only is this great spergout, you're so desperate to get the last word you're trying the "If you respond you lose" tactic that literal grade schoolers use. Holy, kek this is hilarious.
Yes! My monkey obeys!
>you're a dimwit-
A bit dull I'd say.
>No u has been pointed out-
I already acknowledged this. You struggle with reading. We know.
>You can look into those to find a definition-
I come from a place with two. Already acknowledged it. If you can't believe it, tough luck.
>you failed a simple task-
Projecting now?
I'm still waiting on the 10,000 AND for you to find out I already touched on everything you've wasted three replies on.
>if you respond you lose tactic
You don't lose.
Monkeys don't lose.
I want you to finally give me what you said you could deliver. That's why you're my monkey.
Someone as smart as you would know that giving up now without ever showing any proof would be embarrassing.
To waste all that anger.
>Yes! My monkey obeys!
SEETHING
> A bit dull I'd say.
You're a bit more than dull. Everyone can see that, kek.
> I already acknowledged this. You struggle with reading.
You didn't. If you did, you wouldn't have responded with this.
> You're gonna tell me there's no Batman specific threads?
What I said was clear cut to anyone but pajeets.
> I come from a place with two.
Unless, that place is reddit. There's only one definition. I guess this confirms you're from reddit.
> Projecting now?
What's there to project? Checking the archives is an easy task, unlike those non-existent surveys.
>You don't lose.
But you do. That's why you sperg out whenever someone mocks the Batman. You always take Ls and you're desperate for a W. That's why you'll keep responding.
>SEETHING
Oh you have trouble with social cues as well?
You see, I was happy to know that my monkey was obeying. I wasn't furious.
Are things clearer now?
>You're a bit more than dull-
No that was in reference to your insult.
Is that another thing you don't get?
>you wouldn't have responded with this if you did the thing!
And you're critical of the "you reply you lose" trick?
>What I said was clear cut-
I know. I understood it the first time. Even replied in kind about it.
It'll be archived forever. Anyone who wants to read you being blatantly wrong can read it.
>unless it's reddit there's only one which confirms you're from reddit!
Didn't you say you were against third grade argumentative tactics?
>non-existent surveys
You brought up surveys. I never did.
>But you do
Haven't yet.
>You always take L's
If you find truth to be a losing hand, you have no idea what winning is.
>That's why you'll keep responding
Again, weren't you against the "reply and you lose" tactic?
Or is this meant to say, "you lose every time you reply" which leads back into that, or is it "you reply and always lose" which also ties back into that.
I knew you were moronic, but for someone who prides themselves on saying the right thing, I didn't think you'd be so obviously hypocritical.
>you sperg out!
And it procures good results. You're the best lolcow I've had in a while.
He looks like a drug addict cosplayer with bad teeth. I remember when the trailer came out and everyone was clowning on his teeth and stupid "angry" expression. The whole scene is just a shitty copy of the TDK scene.
He has fine teeth.
This movie was so good people literally have to lie to find complaints, kek.
Nah, they are pretty bad. But everyone was making fun of his unintelligible grunting. This movie is an unintentional comedy.
You're not alone. From a review
> Sure, let’s shove a joker in there in a way that basically grinds the ending to a halt and shows us why we typically have this kind of stuff post-credits scenes (even though I basically am exhausted by them). But the second the audience realized who was talking? They snickered. Yup. This Batman loving audience actually snickered. We’ve had so so so much Joker and yet, they couldn’t help but go back to the well again, could they? You could feel the air leave the room
I've seen this before. Where is it from? I've seen multiple people say that the audience laughed at some parts of the movie. Riddler especially was so bad I couldn't believe it.
Riddler was great man.
Over 10,000 people agreed and so did critics.
I like BvS, but even I can admit that Lex was subpar. You're just a shill who pretends this was a perfect movie. Riddler was beyond cringe. The fans of this movie were lulled into believing it is high art because it has some pretty pictures. The writing and acting are fricking terrible. But as long as there's a hecking cool pointless Batmobile chase, it's all good to brainlets.
Filmcrithulk essay.
Thanks.
Audible groans for the Riddler where I'm from.
Almost everyone who watched the film with me thought Dano was terrible. Especially his video messages.
i saw it opening night and some women screamed during riddler's opening scene
women are funny
The opening scene wasn't bad. It's when they allowed Dano to speak it went downhill.
Damn, couldn't even find a review shitting on what he was criticizing, kek.
Nah they're not.
Glad we settled that.
>Everyone was
Nah they weren't. I never saw it.
>unintentional comedy
Nah it has comedy on purpose.
So if you laughed during any scene in the film, you fed into the fact that it had comedic scenes, therefore confirming it set out to complete its mission.
I'm glad we settled this.
Two things can be both ridiculous.
>Besides, it's time to grow out of "Batman NEVER le kills." Snyder was right.
lmao no. Create your Punisher wannabe if you hate Batman
>Batman
Batfleck played a great Bruce Wayne, took the character seriously despite the scripts being no so helpful. His suits were also pretty great and the most varied while still staying true to the comics.
>Superman
Reeves Superman is quite possibly the best portrayal of a comic book her on film. He was a medicore actor but all his talents were perfect for both playing Kent and Superman perfectly. He did minimal steroids and its the only suit thats totally unforgiving but as a viewer you believe he is Superman despite being just a normie linebacker instead of a wacked out bodybuilder. Its just works and still does, Hollywood should take note.
Keaton and Reeve.
I miss that nigha Reeves like you wouldn't believe. No other Superman has even come close, Tom welling was alright but there's something lacking I can't describe
I just realized George Reeves was in Gone with the Wind
>Bale wearing Keaton style costume
>Cavill wearing a Reeves style costume
>both team up in one movie to fight a supervillain, perhaps Brainiac
Would be high kino
Hell yeah dude
I think Cavil could have come close to rivaling Reeves if he had better writing. Man Of Steel definitely had some great moments.
look at those DSL's, Kilmer is GOATed with the sauce
zoomer homosexual go back to tiktok
go drink some prune juice old man
kreaton get two Bartmand?.
Uh why is Superman white in all these? Fricking chuds. Why cant there be a black woman?
Adam West
Brandon Routh
Come at me
I'm with you on Routh. The ending of Returns with him getting stabbed genuinely shook me when I saw it originally.
Returns is underrated and Routh was good.
>I'M STILL SUPERMAN!
Routh was good and the movie had its moment (particularly the airplane scen which is the best Superman moment to ever leave the pages) but the movie was shit.
Granted, I'd rewatch it on repeat over whatever followed, but....
Nice spoiler gay
I like Keaton's and Pattinson's.
Rest are goofy muscle suits and Affleck's is duct tape.
Why does it need breasts? Is a female costume?
At least it's armor and not actual breasts.
That's fake muscle. Pattinson suit actually have torpedo breasts.
I don't think so man, you might just need to rub one out.
Seems like armor meant to fit a muscular male chest.
No. It look like two pointed breasts.
If you see breasts there anon you've got some sexual issues you need to work out.
The problem with the fake pectorals Pattison's wearing is that it is too angular. It reminds me of those bras Madonna would wear.
Male pectorals should look more like two squares.
Except a male chest rounds at the bottom and is majority flat at the middle, like the pieces of armor, which slope a small amount at the bottom and take up most of the space as a muscled flat surface.
For Pattinson's armor to look like actual breasts, the woman's nipple would be the tip of a triangle with a large slope up and a tiny slope inward.
Pattison's armor genuinely look like what a female hero would wear. The fake pectorais have the shape of triangles. That's not how male pectorials are meant to look.
Except the placement of the points, i.e. the nipples, are where male nipples are. Closer to the side at the bottom than the middle in the center for breasts.
So your drawing is incorrect to how his suit is shaped, which more closely resembles the male pectorals with an angular design to accentuate the masculine form.
Dude, his armor is very feminine looking. It feels like i am constantly seeing the underside of his female breasts. It should look blocky, but instead it looks like some torpedo breasts.
And yet
has the same angular slope where the nipple is, just like Pattinson's, as well as the broad chest.
If you genuinely believe male nipples are directly in the center of the chest, like your drawing, you are five years old.
It isn't feminine looking.
It's how the male chest is.
>underside of breasts
breasts have long rectangular slopes that stretch across the chest?
Disagree, the fake pectorals from the Affleck's suit actually look like big squares, very akin to Roman suits.
The problem with Pattison's suit is that it is too pointy. You've an angular shape, with the center pointing outwards. That's why it looks like torpedo breasts.
I guess we'll just have to disagree then.
Torpedo breasts have nipples right in the center.
Both Pattinson and Affleck have angular slopes downward and upward with square blocks to represent the chest, and points at the bottom right to represent the nipples.
If the nips aren't in the center, and the slopes aren't equal in size, it's not a torpedo tit.
>Torpedo breasts have nipples right in the center.
That's the impression Pattison's suit give because right at the center you've this pointy mass. That's why it looks like torpedo breasts. I don't know why they decided to make the fake pectorals look like pyramids. Pyramids reminds me of giant breasts.
Except it isn't at the center. It's bottom right. Where male nipples are. breasts have nips dead center. Pecs don't. Basic biology.
>pyramids
Except they're not. You can see in the images I posted.
The expansive chest part, the two square shaped plates, don't angle forward, but are flat.
So it's flat plates that angle downward. Not two plates that angle upward like a pyramid.
The point the two make on the side, with the slope plate being smaller, is the male nipple, whereas torpedo breasts would meet directly in the center head on.
The red dots circles look like female nipples on top of big torpedo breasts. You can say that they're sagging a bit, but that's it.
Well if they're sagging then they're not torpedo breasts because torpedo breasts stick straight out and don't fricking sag.
You're just describing male pecs.
Look, I know you want to win this.
But biology and logic aren't on your side.
>You're just describing male pecs.
Too pointy to be male pecs. Men don't have pointy as frick nipples. That's the issue. The pecs are too angular. It ends up looking very feminine because of it.
And yet Afflecks suit has lines which make the points at the nipples.
So we've got two near-squares on each, angles on each, proper nipple placement on each, and points where the nipples protrude on each.
>B-b-but one looks like a torpedo tit!
Sagging torpedo breasts? Yeah.
If it was shaped like in my pic, it would have looked better and more manlier.
The problem is that the elevation is almost in the middle of the chest, way too high, and too pointy, and that's why it looks like female breasts.
You sound angry. Chill out.
Why would I be angry?
Torpedo breasts have an equal angle that leads to a nip directly in the center.
Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
It isn't sagging, because torpedo breasts don't sag.
It's just the male chest.
Call it a male torpedo tit if you want, but it logically cannot be female.
>Pattinson's nip is at the bottom, not the center.
The problem is that the "bottom" isn't low enough, it is almost close to the center and thus looks very feminine. Check my pic. The nip line should be at the showed with the blue color, but Pattison's nip line is way up high. It is also too angular where the nip line is very pointy. Like he has a permanent hard nipple.
Same for this.
breasts don't become angular triangles at the bottom, and female superhero costumes have rounded bottom for the breasts because breasts aren't geometric like pectorals.
Both look manly. Neither look feminine.
See this pic. This is why it looks like breasts. Why the bottom is so prominent? It end up looking like the underside of boobs.
Boobs don't have flat slabs under them.
And yet pyramids and cones don't have sharp edges.
Pattinson's nips are at the right level.
The nipples there are way down, not in the middle of the chest like in Pattinson's suit.
Give up, dude. Pattison's suit have breasts.
Sorry, they're not. And if he does have breasts, so does Affleck's.
Where do we go from here?
Post a pic of the two. I dare you.
I already did. I made two markups.
Y'know Affleck's tactical suit is shaped exactly the same right? On the chest. Same exact sloping and pointage.
Frick I meant cones don't have sharp edges.
Pyramids do. But there aren't pyramid bras.
Plus, Pattinson's pyramid is only on the nipple, like Affleck's.
Pattinson's nipples are way too high.
Sorry dude.
They're on the right level, kek.
The nipples in your picture are placed lower than the pointy area of the suit. Nice try.
Nice try, but they're more aligned with the red than the blue.
Just admit it. He doesn't have breasts.
The pointy areas of the suit are way too fricking high. Don't even try to pretend.
>N-n-now I'm gonna make the new spots blue so I win!
Nice try.
If we're judging by closer, and if they're not perfectly aligned then we are, I obviously win.
Anyway, here's one clean of marking.
Even the bodies match, kek.
You're redoing the image and placing the guys nipples way too high just so it will fit the suit. KEK. What a dishonest frick.
Dude, Pattison's suit have breasts. Just accept it and move on with your life.
>Placing the nipples way too high
If they're way too high then why do the bodies match? Why does the arm fit perfectly to Pattinson? If the nipples were off, wouldn't the arm be off too?
Keep the cope comin'.
Pattinson doesn't have breasts and I proved it.
Move on with your life man. This lolcow posting is getting sad.
It look like breasts. You know this deep down. That's why you wasted all this effort to argue instead of just dismissing outright. You know there's merit to it.
I dismissed it outright a while ago.
I'll dismiss it again. They aren't.
But you must know I'm right deep down.
Or you wouldn't have kept replying.
looks like the nips match man
he's right about the arm i think
Batfleck is cooler tho
>breasts
what boobs look like this?
hunter Schafer breasts maybe
Frick the arm does match well.
bro added a line right in the midle to make it look like boobs, lol
Squares are geometric, but so are pyramids and cones and bras have been made in that shape.
Batfleck's pecs aren't shaped like pyramids. They're shaped like human pecs, fake as they are, and they're shaped as squares most importantly.
Pattison's pecs are shaped like pyramids. The center points outwards. Everything is too clean cut and angular for comfort. It ends up looking very "V" like and thus feminine.
Except they are. Cope all you want, but they both share the same shape, only Pattinson's is more geometric.
You find breasts geometric?
The center points outward on Affleck's too.
>V
Well, since they're both pyramids, they'd look V outward.
But shape wise? Pattinson's chest isn't a V.
they both have pyramids solely to the nipples, like ladies do, but it's the placement that defines men to women chests.
one has more space on top while the other is equal top and bottom like perky boobs.
>gen x’ers leaked their cream into their club spandex for this hag
He looks like he's in a Halloween costume.
Big cope. Pattinson's was almost Gotham level bad. Affleck is by far the most comic accurate and best.
I watched the dark knight part two on HBO last night and thought it was pretty cool how the lifted the exact suit from here to BvS final fight
It's close. Heavily inspired from the comic/flick. Dare I say it Snyder is based. I really enjoyed his BvS and justice league cut after hating the frick out of the theatrical version that meme quip homosexual joss whedon desecrated
>meme quip homosexual joss whedon desecrated
99% of Whedon version was Snydershit's material including the cringe jokes, so cope about it homosexual.
>995
BWA-HA-HA, You failed in math didn't you?
-- more than 3 minutes total if awful mystache CGI scenes (kids phone, do yiu bleed, and smallville farm scenes.
-- about 1 minute of unnecessary movie intro store, cops, homeless guy.
-- 15 minutes of Batman roiftop scene,
-- 7 minutes of re-shot Bruce Wayne/Alfred airplane scene
-- 2 minutes + of re-shot Amazon fight scenes
-- more than 5 minutes of unecessary russian family acenes.
-- more than 1 minue of re-shot Aquaman scenes being an ahole to Bruce, then, Victor and also Barry ... plus a douche line for Diana.
--almist 10 minutes of re-shot final fight
-- and more scenes re-shot just for quips, bat jokes, and or boob jokes.
all in 2-hour Whedon theatrical cut.
And you calculte that as 99%.?
See, how we jnow you're a moron who doesn't oay attentio and likes to pull ideas out if his ass?
Why in the frick was the BvS snyder cut I just watched completely different than the slop whedon cut? You don't even make sense. Whedon cut out CHUNKS of the story and exposition and added in meme quips left and right. The tone of synder is atleast hallway serious, the theatrical version that whedon contaminated is a dead pool marvel flick. The doomsday sub plot just kind of happens in the whedon cut with no lead up or reason
>snydroids still under massive delusions
I am so glad his shitty project is dead.
Batfleck was really close to the Frank Miller/Jim Lee suit.
I appreciated the older and more seasoned Batman well beyond the point of giving a shit about murdering or whatever homosexual younger Batman always copes with. Fricking Batman beyond WHEN
That's the Frank Miller version. A lot of people cope about it but Batman kills in Dark Knight Returns. Snyder based his Batman on that.
No he doesn't. I know what panel of the panel you are talking about and that has been debunked by Miller.
Yes, he does. He also kills in the prequel.
Isn't it stated that those are rubber bullets and concussion grenades? Also, if he does indeed kill, that automatically makes it the worst batman comic. Batman not killing is the one rule. If you want a batman that kills, go read Punisher.
He shoots rubber bullets in subsequent pages. No mention of concussion grenades. Realistically those dudes are dead. Even the animated movie has him shooting missiles that blow up thugs.
The cowl looks moronic. His cranium is swollen, like a waterhead indeed.
>head looks swollen
Nah it doesn't.
>cowl is moron
Nah it's cool.
>water head indeed
Are you a Brit?
If that's the case it really deflates the death of the joker.
i like Patterson's too
reminds me of wolverine
(guess he's a torpedo titter now)
I like both Keaton suits a lot. They're my favorite.
Best Joker
The two Keaton suits are the best, followed by Val Kilmer's "Panther suit" which is basically an updating of the Keaton suit. The Kilmer "Sonar suit" and both Clooney suits are trash, Bale's Batman Begins suit is serviceable, the Dark Knight & Dark Knight Rises suits are shit, all the Affleck suits are shit.The Pattinson cowl and cape are good but the body is bland tacticool shit that feels like the Nolan movies.
You, sir, are the only correct person itt.
The Panther suit is fricking great. Yes, nipples, but ignore that and it's a perfect organic looking costume that makes him look like a creature of the night.
great suit
>Bats
Keaton Batsuits are still my favorite because of the almost all-black color save for the utility belt and emblem, fitting for the "Dark Knight". My preference goes to 89 because of the natural looking pecs compared to returns flat ones, but returns also has the correct emblem, so the perfect one would be 89 suit with Returns emblem.
As and
said, Kilmer's panther suit is fricking great, a kind of upgrade of the Burton suits, though I'd have kept the belt yellow.
I thought I'd hate Affleck suit, but I ended up really liking it, despite the way too big bat imo and the tiny ears, it's a nice balance of grey and black.
I'm not a huge fan of Bale Batsuits, they're too tactical, save for the Begins one, which is the one from the movie where Nolan's "muh realism" autism wasn't too cringeworthy, except for the awful look of the Scarecrow, since at least Gotham looks like Gotham and not NYC/Chicago.
TAS/JL cartoon suits also make Batman look good with a black/dark blue cape and cowl.
>Supes
Nostalgia says Reeve for purely classic, but the fact is that Routh's suit could have been the best save for those awful dark red/maroon parts.
Cavill suit is good despite the darker colors, but it definitely needed to have a red belt like in the New 52 comics to "separate" the suit, like with Batman's yellow belt.
Keaton and Reeve. Affleck could have been good but he was never given the right movie.
it proves batman will always look stupid in live action regardless of how they try to make it look or with whom
Not true though.
Look at how they lit Keaton in 89 versus the ones that came after. They did it right there. German expressionist is the style that works for him the most.
This
Routh and Bale, no doubt.
I never understood comparing these suits in isolation. Keaton's suit as good as they're would look shit in Nolan's films and the overall aesthetic they go far. The suits are designed with the films overall aesthetic in mind. Batfleck looks great in BvS but looks dogshit in any promo pic to give another example.
BvS Batman mogs all
What a fricking beast.
How sad people have to cope by calling this fat.
Shit car, funny head. Looks like a hamster, not a bat.
No batman looks like a bat
Except for stan lee's
>Funny head
Ohnononono
Remember when that guy posted that image in a thread and said Batfleck never looked goofy, and he got BTFO'd?
I hope you're that guy.
That's right, Affleck never looked that goofy. You can dig up some obscure image of Batfleck in a compromised position, but Pattinson looks like a waterhead in every shot.
>You're right
So...Affleck did look goofy?
Glad we agree.
>H-h-h-he looked like a water head while Affleck would only look bad in a compromised position!
Kek you lolcows are rich.
Suit looks like plastic incapable of being bullet proof and his bat ears are way too short
We're back to Michael Keaton though.
>Best Batman
Affleck and Cavill
Lol at autist arguing whether Pattinson's suit has breasts. It was shit either way like the rest of the movie.
Because the Batman is quintessential slop. There's nothing worthwhile in discussing it. Matt Reeves is JJ Abrams with a darker aesthetic.
The Batman Returns batsuit is the best in my opinion. It's similar to the first movie's batsuit, but with some good improvements.
C.Reeves and Keaton
Good god why do Batman threads always devolve into the most autistic arguments?
homies ITT arguing about Batman's breasts
It's pattinson fans. They are super defensive and insecure for some reason. They have to call Affleck fat or duct taped to prop up Pattinson, and have a meltdown when he is criticized.
Because that what nerds do and should be doing instead of being demoralised with D.I.E. horseshit.
Not fair, christian bale had 3 different suits. He was bulky as frick looking and then they really slimmed it down. Did not care for the neck area around the cowl after begins
I honestly think The dark knight batsuits are some of the worst. I hated how the movies were so obsessed with realism. It was comical how serious and up its own as it was. Also, Heath Ledger's Joker is overrated.
>I hated how the movies were so obsessed with realism
They weren't
> It was comical how serious and up its own as it was.
I assume you hate BvS and The Batman as well based on this.
You are not gonna try and say a movie with a performance like Colin Farrell's Penguin is taking itself seriously.
>Colin Farrell's Penguin
> The Batman was good.
Of course, it's The Batman shills trying to disparage the trilogy. Jej, Your terrible attempts at aping Se7en and Zodiac made the film so uber serious that TDK feels light hearted in comparison.
I dislike every live action joker performance.
>Waaah I think it must be good if it's old and nostalgic!!
kek. seethers are great.
Remember, The Batman is considered an overly serious and comically bad attempt at aping Fincher. This is either considered mid or terrible with the exception of a handful of Gen Z morons who pretend they know comics.
>considered
Meaning Cinemaphile hates it and everyone else loves it.
>everyone else loves it.
Everyone else forgot about it.
>Aesthetics
> Burton
As I said. You're a zoomie who doesn't know anything. Burton's aesthetic wasn't comic accurate. He was just doing what he does in every other film i.e ape German expressionism and give it a more gothic aesthetic. It was such a success that it future comics and cartoons like BTAS copied them. Comics became Burton accurate not the other way around.
I can guarantee Gothic wasn't in the vocabulary of the average Batman nerd before Burton.
Still looks more like a lemur than a bat, kek.
What Burton did was an Improvement. I guess you want gotham to look like Chicago.
A film can look like Chicago, LA, New York and still be great. Heat, Se7en, Chinatown, and so many other crime flicks take place in regular cities and still give a distinct atmosphere. It's all in the hands of the director. There's a reason anyone who has seen Heat can feel it in TDK and it's not due to the plot.
The dogmatic expectation that every filmmaker to stick to Burton aesthetics which while great is silly.
>minimum of 10,000 people forgot about this movie I'm talking about because...I don't like it!
It is the most comic accurate interpretation. Accept in one department- aesthetics. Batman Returns feels like the comics.
Nope. The Batman was good. Batman v. Superman was a cgi shit show. Batman is a detective above all else.
But The Batman had Batman being a moron that can't solve any clue or save anyone.
Still more detective than any other batman movie.
> Still more detective.
Neither is Lemurman. A local beat cop could've solved the case in 2 days.
>Lemurman
Already disproven. Many bats have wings which connect at the feet.
And, Batman knew Spanish.
What do you have against this movie? Are you upset Ben Affleck got canned?
He is Affleck.
I'm not Snyder fan and while I don't care if you nerds shill your mediocre Batshit, I just want to remind you that you should keep Nolan and Burton's films out of your mouths.
Keep your console wars to Snydershit.
Nolan had one good movie.
Burton had one good movie.
Reeves will have three.
Oh shit, I forgot to keep it out of my mouth.
What was I supposed to not say?
Burton and Nolan?
Or Nolan and Burton?
Just Burton?
Or just Nolan?
The only way Reeves will have 2 more good batman movies is if he stears clear of the Joker. Joker fatigue has set in. Even in the comics. It's cringey how everytime the joker appear in the comics, the writer feels the need to one-up the violence of his previous appearance.
He won't have Joker in the sequel.
But he might be in the third.
No he has one.
You just miscounted. Easy mistake.
>No he has one.
>You just miscounted
He has Zero(0). You have terrible taste. Not easy to recognize for midwits.
>terrible taste
Subjective
>0
Subjective
>Not easy to recognize for midwits
I know. You think you have good taste.
See? I'm being subjective.
>Subjective
>Subjective
Congratulations on figuring out a basic element of cinema. Film is subjective which is why most people yawn or laugh at your mediocre flick, why Cinemaphile shits on it 24/7 while a handful of you desperately try to defend it.
Find me 10,000 people who hate it.
Go on, kek.
If it's so widespread, pull it up.
>that's why Cinemaphile hates it because Cinemaphile is the whole population
Massive seething.
>Find me 10,000 people who hate it.
Do they make surveys for this kind of thing?
>>that's why Cinemaphile hates it because Cinemaphile is the whole population.
Are you a pajeet? Seems like you can't comprehend basic English.
You said everyone forgot about it.
So if 10,000 people, minimum, loved it, and yet everyone forgot about it, then the only people left would be the people who remember it to hate it.
i.e. the rest of the population alongside folks who never saw it.
Are you a pajeet?
>Do they make surveys?
Who knows. But 10,000 people loved it. Go find your own numbers. Ya gotta beat 10,000.
>You said everyone forgot about it.
I don't have to provide stats because they don't make stats for this. But I can look at the general discourse(which all but disappeared 1 month after release)and boxoffice performance to make a good guess 🙂
>General discourse
My friends still talk about it.
Guess people didn't forget.
>Box office
It made more for WB than BvS.
Did people forget about BvS?
>My friends still talk about it.
>Guess people didn't forget.
Are these friends in the room with us right now?
> It made more for WB than BvS.
It made more profits* but that's due to budget. It had a less overall gross and much lower ticket sales. It's telling that BvS is considered a near universally reviled movie with terrible audience reception and yet was seen by more people.
>In the room with us
No they're at their respective homes/apartments.
>BvS is hated but more people saw it!
So now we're arguing amount of people who saw it?
We were talking about the amount who hated The Batman. Now you're saying everyone hated BvS and The Batman?
>No they're at their respective homes/apartments.
Decent world building you got there in your mind.
> We were talking about the amount who hated The Batman.
Read jeet, Read.
> Film is subjective which is why most people yawn or laugh at your mediocre flick.
It means people either hated it or were bored by it. Your film is a non-factor.
>Decent world building in your head
Midwits often confuse reality for fantasy. You're not alone, many have the condition.
>film is subjective which is why most yawn or laugh
But you're assigning an opinion you can't prove, which is subjective.
I've got proof 10,000 people loved it. You've got words insisting they yawned, and ya back it up by insisting anonymous Cinemaphile posts are enough proof.
See the difference? I wrote it so even midwits could get it.
>Midwits often confuse reality for fantasy.
You're so close to self-awareness, yet still coming up short. So sad.
> But you're assigning an opinion you can't prove.
I did. You just don't want to accept the evidence I'm showing you. The fact all you can do it bring up "me and muh friends discuss it" as a counter argument to its near disappearance from pop culture discourse is hilarious to say the least.
So what is your favorite batman movie? If you say batman v superman, I am going to laugh at you
Tie Between TDK and Mask of The Phantasm.
My brotha. Mask of Phantasm is pure kino.
The only Batman film to have a great romance.
That's true. At this point I wonder why they keep trying to shoehorn in a romance. It never works, it is usually dropped in the next movie and it takes away from batman doing batman stuff.
>You're so close
And yet you grow further still
>I've provided proof
No, you haven't. Just words. I've got 10,000 people backing me.
>Your friends
And 10,000 people.
Did you forget about them?
The 10,000 people?
Unless you're going to argue they all forgot about it?
Kek. Good luck.
>And yet you grow further still
"N-no u" is that the best you could come up with? Looks like you're already at your wits end, kek.
> I've got 10,000 people backing me.
Oh wow, the world building becomes even more elaborate.
>Kek. Good luck.
Did you have an aneurysm there? Or maybe it was just your sperg nature resurfacing. Sad little creature, at least shills get paid. You do this for free 24/7.
>No u is weak
Like saying my friends don't exist when I say they do?
Midwits don't know when they're being hypocritical, I don't blame you.
>World building is more elaborate
See
>Did you have a seizure? An-
Blah, blah not an argument.
We done?
>Like saying my friends don't exist when I say they do?
You don't even understand what "n-no u" means do you? Pffft...HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
> Blah, blah not an argument.
Yes, it's an insult. Meant to mock you.
>You don't know what no u is!
I do actually.
It's when someone says something, and the response is merely an insult or a repeat of what they've said directed at them.
I say
>I have friends
And you say
>No you're delusional
Pretty weak.
>Yeah it's an insult.
Good. Not an argument. Glad we agree.
Why add it then?
No one seems to be laughing at your mocking.
>It's when someone says something, and the response is merely an insult or a repeat of what they've said directed at them.
No you don't. It's when you repeat the exact same insult. I call you dumb, and then you say I'm the dumb. That's what it means. When you say I you have friends but I argue they're imaginary, what exactly am I repeating here?
It's hilarious that something that simple needs to explain. You're a genuine cretin, kek.
> Why add it then?
Because you deserve to be mocked. Hope that's clear.
>It's hilarious that something that simple-
Except I already said that.
I gave both definitions.
The simple repeat, and when insults include "no u" as a lead in.
You can't read?
>Because you deserve to be-
Insults fly when proof runs dry.
It was inevitable. You were just against too much.
Don't worry man. I'll put in a good word for you during your next argument.
I accept your concession.
>Except I already said that.
>I gave both definitions.
There's no "two definitions". There's only one. Why do you think "N-no u" is the phrase being used?
In fact, Since you like proofs. Check the Cinemaphile archives and give me 1 example of it being used to denote that.
> Insults fly when proof runs dry.
That's a nice nursery rhyme, kek. You're being mocked as a cretin because your arguments are cretinous. You're called a homosexual because you're one.
There's no definitions where I come from.
>Why do you think-
I explained why. You really can't read?
>Check the archives!
Quid pro quo anon. I'm still waiting for your 10,000.
Anyway, I trust my past more than anonymous posts.
>You're being mocked-
Another angry rant. Oo wee you're a funny sap.
I forgot how fun it was to milk replies from lolcows.
*two
Not no.
I'm no deconstructionist. There are definitions, kek.
>There's no definitions where I come from.
The mental asylum?
> Quid pro quo anon. I'm still waiting for your 10,000.
No surveys exist but you can check the archives. Unless, of course you're too dumb for that as well.
> I forgot how fun it was to milk replies from lolcows.
Oh definitively, you're totally enjoying this argument. Just like you enjoy arguing 24/7 trying to convince people here that the Batman isn't absolute utter crap in every thread to no avail, kek.
>The mental-
Already fixed the mistake. Invalid response.
>Check the archives
I've been on many threads like this. It's always the same folks shitting on The Batman.
Their writing styles are unique.
>You're totally enjoying this
I know man. I said I was.
>To no avail
Believe me, I've convinced a few.
If I had no influence, you wouldn't be oh so mad.
>Already fixed the mistake. Invalid response.
Don't care. Unless, the place you come from is reddit there's only one definition.
> I've been on many threads like this.
Tsk, Tsk, Lazy, Lazy. People criticize anons copying insults all the time saying "You're just going n-no u". It's not even Batman specific threads newbie.
> I know man. I said I was.
Oh I totally believe you, kek
> Believe me, I've convinced a few.
Are they in the room with us right now?
Personally I hope the reeves sequels stick to the idea of exploring Gothams dark and corrupt history. I think the court of owls would be the perfect way to end the trilogy.
>court of owls
The more I hear about this the more moronic it sounds
I hate the retcon shit they do to add bullshit to already established origins. Like that Gotham show to make everyone know each other since the beginning even though a lot of villains traditionally have origins after Bruce Wayne becomes batman.
Yeah the Gotham show was bad. I do think the Court of Owls could be done well with some creative liberties. I like the idea of them having "nests" on the blocked off 13th floor of old skyscrapers. Also, I would ditch the character of Lane March and make the Talon more grounded so that they aren't ninja sleeper agents.
Ending the sequel with the Court's reveal and the third dealing with it would be cool.
They don't even need to reveal it in the sequel. I would prefer they hint at its existence through owl imagery in Gothams older buildings and even Wayne manor.
>Reeves will have three
Is he going to make 4 films then? Because he doesn't even have 1 so far.
Peoople laughed at your Batman in theaters.
Zach Snyder's daughter wasn't laughing lmao
Frick.
I wouldn't go that far.
It's just a movie.
Bale only had two suits; the two you posted.
>we will never get a good Hal Jordan movie
It hurts so much bros.
I like it because how Warhammer 40K-esq it looks.
Reminder that if you say that:
>TDK is bad
>The Burton movies are bad
>Batman Forever is bad
Then you are either a troll, an idiot, or just have bad taste. With the exception of thinking Batman Forever is bad, it's a pretty decisive movie and I understand why people don't like it.
Keaton, hands down. Look at the fricking ears, homosexuals, LOOK AT THEM.
Fricking tiny Batfleck head nipples, frick off with that shit.
outfit-wise? ben affleck. don't care about superman though he looks goofy in any outfit
you motherfrickers, now I can't unsee armored breasts on pattison
It's just a lazy and unimaginative design altogether.
the mask is kino thoughever
The mask isn't bad but I think they alter the nose.
I don't get this
they genuinely don't look like breasts
It's not even a contest for Superman. Christopher Reeves.
Batman is either Bale or West.
Keaton and Reeve. It's the popular opinion but it's popular for a good reason.
The rest of the Batmans all sucked for one reason or another but Welling, Routh, and Cavill were decent Supermans even if the writing for the latter 2 was dogshit.
this one could've been kino but these weird hand pieces ruin the whole look
also the wingsuit, wtf were they thinking?
Yeah the wing suit was dumb. I would have preferred that he used his cape to glide like the Arkham games. Would have looked less awkward.
This entire thread needs to touch grass and have sex
I WILL NEVER TOUCH GRASS I WILL NEVER HAVE SEX. NOTHING, NOT EVEN YOUR DISPARAGING POST CAN MAKE ME. HOW DOES THAT MAKE YOU FEEL, TOUGH GUY????
holy shit why does Zack Snyder make bitter autists go off the rails, seethe and stamp around like a woman throwing a tantrum and shit their diapers?
Unironically take your meds
Kevin Porter is the best looking Batman and the only one who doesn't look like an autist
Cool cosplay but every live action batman looks better
Except patterson
Nah Pattinson is about as good as Porter.
>every live action batman looks better
No live action batman looks better
I'm not watching your shitty fanfilm
It looks like a slightly high budget cosplay. Why do comicbook gays have such shitty aesthetic sense?
Chadfleck mogs.
>Clooney 2.0 mogs
OK
Keaton followed by Bale
Reeves followed by Routh
Bale and Reeve
Bale > Affleck > West
All the Supemans are pretty gay.
For me it's Tom Welling's. Smallville holds up amazingly good to be honest. I watched the first 2 seasons recently and they were absolute units. Made me feel like I was 14 again and Lana Lang was such a fricking hottie. So much fan service of her too, no wonder I had a crush on her,
Keaton and Reeve
Honorable mention to the Nolan 'fit.
HOLY SHIT FRICK OFF CARD NO ONE LOVES YOU. STOP SHILLING YOUR homosexualY CHANNEL. YOU'RE A PSEUD homosexual WHO WEARS DRESSES TO BE HIP WITH LGBT FREAKS AND PRETENDS TO BELIEVE IN GOD SO YOUR MORMON CHURCH WONT DISOWN YOU. EVERYTHING YOU DO IS FAKE AND GAY AND FOR ATTENTION AND YOU EVEN ADMIT TO THIS YOURSELF. YOUR BANAL RAMBLINGS IN FRONT OF A CHALKBOARD DON'T MAKE YOU ANYMORE AN INTELLECTUAL THAN WRITING IN METRE MAKES YOU A POET OR DESCRIBING A LITTLE GIRL PISSING HERSELF MAKES YOU AVANT GARDE. YOUR LITERARY PERSONA WAS SO MUCH OF AN ACT THAT YOU'RE TRYING TO GET VIEWERS FROM THE Cinemaphile BOARD NOW. BUT IT'S NOT LIKE YOU HAVE ANY VIEWERS, YOU LITERALLY PAYED FOR ALL YOUR SUBSCRIBERS YET YOU STILL TRY TO BOAST ABOUT BEING A 'SOMEONE'.
what da when was ben affleck batman?
grow up
Batfleck wins everything every bat suit he had was the best Batman suit had the best Batmobile too Keaton suit and Batmobile are overrated. Favorite Superman suit? I guess I like the black suit from the Snyder cut even if it’s unconventional idk kind of neat to see something different
>Batman
Michael Keaton.
>Superman
Brandon Routh.
Is it weird that I legit think both suits look better from right to left?
You all get so mad.
Cinemaphile has the best lolcows.
Anyway, you got proof that everyone feels this way?
If you do, I'll never reply here again.
Not him, but I hate shameless shills and deeply insecure people who act grandiose to compensate.
Both of these apply to you.
If you hate me, you hate who I'm arguing with too.
I don't think he's a shill though, I'll give him that.
But I'll shill for The Batman any day of the week.
Yep, he seems like a homosexual too.
Batfleck board
I'm well aware.
Cinemaphile has poor taste.
Lmao. no. There are maybe 3 butthurt snydertards.
And one delusional patterson shill.
Board belongs to people who dislike both becasue they are both shit. And it reflects the general opinion
> Cinemaphile has the best lolcows.
It must take a lot of copium to think you aren't the laughing stock here.
If you wanna go that direction, I'd be one of two.
It would take a shitload of copium to think I was the only one.
> Oh you have trouble with social cues as well?
Oh you're absolutely seething. Your responses getting angrier by the minute. Kek
> No that was in reference to your insult.
And mine was a reference to your intellect. Hope that's clear.
> And you're critical of the "you reply you lose" trick?
Well at least, you're admitting you did in fact try that trick. Let's be honest. You desperately want the last word and you were hoping that the third grade tactic would relieve you of that misery.
> I know. I understood it the first time.
You still don't seem to be understanding it, kek. No anon is on your side and everyone sees you for the dumb sperg thar you
> Didn't you say you were against third grade argumentative tactics?
It's not an argument. It's a statement of fact redditor. Instead of admitting you got the definition wrong you just keep digging yourself further
> You brought up surveys. I never did.
So they don't exist, good on you for admitting that.
> Haven't yet.
Check the thread.
> If you find truth to be a losing hand
What truth? The only truth you need to accept is that The Batman is mediocre and people here will laugh at it.
>Again, weren't you against the "reply and you lose" tactic?
Yes and calling you out for your desperation isn't it. Because that's the underlying reason for your ape out.
> You're the best lolcow I've had in a while.
You can keep telling yourself that you aren't the subject of mockery but it won't change ground realities.
I was gonna go play by play again to prove you wrong more, but you've lost here.
You specifically erased my number to get out of "replying to me".
That has to be the saddest thing I've ever seen.
You're in the thread moron. You can see the response. The number erasure is obviosly accidental. I'm sure you'll run away regardless even if I post it again with your number, kek.
Yes, the only way to signify you're speaking to me being erased after I called you out for the "reply and lose" trick is ACCIDENTAL.
I'm not running away.
If this thread decides we're spergs, then I will sperg out until the last star explodes.
Give me every intentional misinterpretation, exaggeration, and ad hominem you can.
I will always reply.
Because you're wrong. And I can prove it.
>Yes, the only way to signify you're speaking to me being erased after I called you out for the "reply and lose" trick is ACCIDENTAL.
Here. Let me post this to you directly then. Kek
> Oh you have trouble with social cues as well?
Oh you're absolutely seething. Your responses getting angrier by the minute. Kek
> No that was in reference to your insult.
And mine was a reference to your intellect. Hope that's clear.
> And you're critical of the "you reply you lose" trick?
Well at least, you're admitting you did in fact try that trick. Let's be honest. You desperately want the last word and you were hoping that the third grade tactic would relieve you of that misery.
> I know. I understood it the first time.
You still don't seem to be understanding it, kek. No anon is on your side and everyone sees you for the dumb sperg thar you
#
> Didn't you say you were against third grade argumentative tactics?
It's not an argument. It's a statement of fact redditor. Instead of admitting you got the definition wrong you just keep digging yourself further
> You brought up surveys. I never did.
So they don't exist, good on you for admitting that.
> Haven't yet.
Check the thread.
> If you find truth to be a losing hand
What truth? The only truth you need to accept is that The Batman is mediocre and people here will laugh at it.
>Again, weren't you against the "reply and you lose" tactic?
Yes and calling you out for your desperation isn't it. Because that's the underlying reason for your ape out.
> You're the best lolcow I've had in a while.
You can keep telling yourself that you aren't the subject of mockery but it won't change ground realities.
>getting angrier
I'm quite content.
>hope it's clear
Never said it wasn't.
>at least you're admitting you tried it
No, I replied to your use of the term, not in a way which stated I was "admitting" anything.
But this is common. You intentionally misrepresent shit.
>you want the last word
It has nothing to do with the last word. It has everything to do with proving you wrong.
If you said I was right in the next reply, I wouldn't reply.
You'd have the last word. Your perception of me is infantile.
>would relieve you
Again, the misery comes from you thinking you're right.
I'm not going anywhere.
>no one is on your side
Plenty of people in this thread like The Batman.
Plus, that guy called you a homosexual,
>admitting you got the definition wrong
My hometown isn't wrong.
>surveys don't exist
I never said they did. You brought them up as the means of getting your proof. I never did.
You shot yourself in the foot and are happy when I said it was stupid.
>The Batman is mediocre
Everyone not on here disagrees.
>People here will laugh at it
People here laugh at dead people. Laughing doesn't bother me. Being factually incorrect does.
>for you to ape out
I'm still here.
>you can keep telling yourself you aren't the subject of mockery
We both are.
There aren't two posts so I have no way of knowing who the frick you are. There's no (you) to compare it alongside.
I can take a screenshot and say
>look it isn't me!
and claim it's a gotcha.
> number to get out of "replying to me".
There aren't any rules preventing you from responding to posts that aren't quoting you. I'm with that anon on this. It looks like you want to give yourself an out using a non-existent technicality.
If this isn't a samegay I don't know what is.
This is the exact same kind of intentional misunderstanding of one of my posts only he could accomplish.
Only he would be so literal as to think I was saying it was a rule and that it had nothing to do with our conversation.
That's not me schizo. Proof. Just goes to show, others can see your cowardice.
Different anon here. Imo yiu lost this argument several responses ago and I now think less of The Batman than I did previously. Hope you're happy shill 🙂
Opinions aren't factually incorrect.
I can't do shit about whether or not you like it.
But me losing is factually incorrect.
Smallville guy actually wore the suit?
In the finale I think.
I like that everyone in this thread is talking about Batman because the Superman suits are all the same boring shit
We all agree on which is the best
I like the Batmobile from the Batman I never liked the super long Keaton car or the armored vehicle bale car I prefer more of a turbo charged modified regular car
>I watch Batman to se a regular car
Pic not related, obviously
I'm trans btw
Very funny.
I think I've been psyopped by the arkham games but the Arkham Knight inspired suit by Pattinson looked the best in my opinion.
Aesthetically Burton is the coolest. Realistically the Pattinson suit is the most viable. The Affleck suit is a decent middle ground on the spectrum.